It's just our reality within
a broken hiring system.
A broken hiring system is a shitty enough reality to deal with on its own; what's even more odious about the whole affair are the «thought leaders» out there who arrogantly defend the hiring process status quo.
Not exact matches
Hacker
hires can be roughly
broken into two categories:
hiring the person who hacked your
system, and
hiring the person who hacked some other company's
system.
But, for instance, let's say you have some Catholic classes you need a teacher for... would you really
hire someone you know to be
breaking your moral code to teach your belief
system?
Legislative Democrats say
hiring a procurement compliance director doesn't reform of a «flawed and
broken»
system.
They mouth a popular education reform sentiment, (recently saying that the «
system of teacher recruitment, training and
hiring is
broken and needs an overhaul») but in reality put their money where their unions» best interests lie.
A more effective option could be
hiring a home security company to monitor your home, with an alarm
system that can protect you from burglars by alerting police to any
break - in at your home.
When family units
break apart, it is important to
hire an experienced family law attorney who understands the importance of preserving family relationships and knows how to navigate the family court
system.
Way to go CREA / ORE for continuing to support the
broken model and hoping for the best from a few here and there, all the while knowing full well that you are exposing the general public to the vagaries of the hit - and - miss
system of
hiring and recruiting as many (if not more) as those who are routinely, predictably, falling by the wayside.
In any event, the writer has said that the entire
system was exposed and that
broken pipes were discovered, so why wouldn't they just repair the damaged septic
system pipes (which isn't very expensive) and close the field etc., back up, and
hire someone to clean the well!