Sentences with phrase «brought against a buyer»

Two courts have considered whether a lawsuit can be brought against a buyer's representative who is compensated by a seller's broker alleging violations of the federal Residential Lead - Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 («Act»).

Not exact matches

Exxon this week hit back against the California lawsuits in a filing with a Texas state court pointing out none of the cities disclosed such risks to bond buyers and arguing the lawsuits were politically motivated and linked to cases brought by the states of New York and Massachusetts.

Competing against the Ford Explorer, Honda Pilot, Nissan Pathfinder and Toyota Highlander, Subaru brings space and convenience to the Ascent to woo buyers.

(2) Any buyer injured by a violation of this part may bring an action against the surety bond or trust account of the credit service organization.

Submitting an offer above the purchase price may be necessary in a market where you are competing against multiple offers but runs the risk of the property not appraising and the buyer needing to bring additional money to closing if they are applying for financing.

Represents Malagasy groups (commodities traders) in their disputes against buyers, brought before French and international arbitration courts

In similar work, the team defended ThyssenKrupp GfT Gleistechnik against damage claims brought by Deutsche Bahn together with regional transport companies and superstructure material buyers.

When the Buyer was unable to secure financing to complete the purchase and thus terminating the contract between the parties, the Sellers brought a lawsuit against the Buyer, the Buyer's representative, and the representative's brokerage, arguing that the Buyer had not acted in good faith in her efforts to secure financing and the Buyer's representative had not forwarded the Amendment to the Lender.

In my opinion, an unsuccessful buyer in a bidding war could bring a lawsuit against a seller or brokerage who comply with an escalation clause, stating that they only put in their bid on the understanding that their bid price would remain confidential.

Five buyers brought a class - action suit against a lender and affiliated entities for allegedly overcharging and marking up fees assessed for loan services such as document preparation and flood certification.

I was stunned to hear that 67 percent of the lawsuits against real estate practitioners were brought by buyers, many against their own representatives.

The nine buyers brought a lawsuit against the Beemans, the Company, the Lender, and the Appraiser for engaging in a conspiracy to defraud, fraud, violations of the state's consumer protection act («Act»), and negligent misrepresentation.

They then brought a lawsuit against the Buyer's Representative and the Brokerage, alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud.

The Buyer brought a lawsuit against the Developer, claiming that the Developer misrepresented the Neighbor's disruptive behavior and alleged negligent misrepresentation, consumer fraud allegations, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.

The Buyers brought a lawsuit against the listing broker («Listing Broker»), alleging that they had a duty to disclose that the property had not been cleaned up.

The Buyers refused this offer, and so the Seller brought a third - party action against the Brokerage.

A buyer brought a claim for negligence against the appraiser and the court dismissed because buyer had accurate information prior to closing.

The Buyers brought a lawsuit against the Seller alleging failure to disclose, misrepresentation, breach of contract, and negligence.

The buyer brought suit against the seller, claiming fraud and failure to comply with the state's disclosure statute.

An Illinois court has considered whether a brokerage could bring a lawsuit for fraud and conspiracy against lender and buyers for failed transactions.

Therefore, the court ruled that the only commission claim that the Buyer's Representative could bring would be a claim against the listing broker, not the Seller, and so dismissed the lawsuit against the Seller.

The Buyer brought a lawsuit against the Sellers, the Brokerage, the Salesperson, and an inspection company, alleging fraudulent and innocent misrepresentation against both parties for failure to disclose the property's alleged flooding problems and failure to accurately disclose the property's boundaries.

The Brokerage brought a cross-claim against the Buyer's Representative.

A South Carolina court has considered whether a buyer could bring allegations against a seller for alleged misrepresentations made by a real estate professional retained by the seller.

The warranties associated with a deed, can form the basis of a later lawsuit brought by the buyer against the seller if there is a problem with the title to the property.

The Buyer brought a lawsuit against the Sellers, and the trial court ruled that the Sellers were guilty of negligent misrepresentation and also ruled that the Buyer had suffered $ 25,000 in damages.

The Buyer brought a lawsuit, alleging that the Broker was liable for fraudulent concealment, negligent misrepresentations, and violations of the state's Consumer Protection Act («Act»), a statute which protects consumers against fraud.

The Buyers brought a lawsuit against the Salesperson and the Brokerage, alleging negligence, breach of the state's consumer protection act, and breach of contract.