Not exact matches
New
Scientist echoed the point in an editorial: «If the purpose of the Microbiological Research Establishment is to learn to make vaccines and devise other measures to protect the country
against man - made epidemics — just as we try to protect ourselves
against influenza or measles — then there is every reason to
bring the establishment under the Ministry of Health» («Porton — the infection spreads», 30 May 1968).
Microbes vs. Disease, Round III By modifying a few genes in adenoviruses (which
bring us the common cold),
scientists at Introgen Therapeutics are engineering weapons
against cancer.
In 1971, while serving as Minister of Education and Science,
against opposition from many
scientists, she helped
bring about, «a messy process of reform of government - funded science in which customer — contractor relationships figured strongly,» Agar writes.
In a case
brought by environmentalists
against Tehri Dam, the Supreme Court of India sided with government
scientists to dismiss safety concerns.
This new - found knowledge is
bringing scientists closer to finding new weapons to add to their arsenal
against malaria, and will hopefully give them the upper hand to defeat this deadly disease in the future.
Aiming to push back
against the narrative that progressive politics don't have a place in gaming, the three day event at Parsons School of Design from July 31st to August 2nd,
brought together educators, developers, social
scientists, neuroscientists, business people, and fans to think through what videogames can do to enhance the world.
-LSB-...] everyone that the best - selling author who has become a hero to Deniers — even
bringing his trash talk
against U.S. climate
scientists to a Senate hearing — doesn't seem to know the first thing about global warming -LSB-...]
The only specific policies that I have advocated are (1) that
scientists be required to archive their data and methods; (2) that proxies used in multiproxy studies be
brought up to date to permit validation
against the warm 1990s; (3) that disclosure and due diligence practices in climate science be improved.
Affidavits filed in the British Columbia Supreme Court libel litigation
brought by climate
scientist Michael Mann
against climate science denier Timothy Ball reveal that Ball's collaborator and self - styled «legal advisor» has misrepresented his credentials and endured some significant legal embarrassments of his own.
And they have influenced a much larger body of climate
scientists (and other
scientists) into going along with them, because they are
brought into this by working to fight the good fight
against the war on science by the dark forces.
WUWT featured guest commentary by Tim Ball, who said that the recent dismissal of a lawsuit
brought against him by climate
scientist Andrew Weaver was «a victory for free speech and a blow
against the use of the law to silence people.»
Similar to Hollywood, it is the tenured and established
scientists who do speak out
against the groupthink and in doing so,
bring down the wrath of the climate establishment upon themselves.
«Following the storms, a coalition of environmental NGO's
brings a class - action sit
against the U.S. government and fossil - fuel companies on the grounds of neglecting what
scientists (including their own) have been saying for years: that something must be done,» the scenario states.
Last month, a man by the name of Jagadish Shukla (along with several other
scientists) sent a letter to the President and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, demanding that RICO charges — that is, «racketeering, influenced and corrupt organization» charges — be
brought against so - called «climate deniers,» as though those who disagree with the theory that global climate change is inherently man made and undeniably catastrophic, were joined together in a conspiracy that amounts to organized crime.
Several environmental
scientists brought a total of three complaints
against Lomborg to the Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty (DCSD), a body under Denmark's Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation.
In a series of blog posts published over ten days, McIntyre attacked climate
scientist Professor Michael Mann in relation to a defamation suit the
scientist brought against Canadian conservative commentator Mark Steyn and others.