Sentences with phrase «bucket adjustment pre-1941»

In the future, rather than perpetuating the use of the clumsy phrase «bucket adjustment» to cover a what is really a set of stepwise adjustment procedures, we could describe the present activity as the search for Windowed Marine De-trending procedures.

I noticed the post http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=2525 by googling «sst bucket adjustment».

Therefore the bucket adjustment methodology and the bucket adjustments themselves need to be prominently illustrated and adjusted in any SST estimate that purports to be scientific.

I would have thought that modelers would want to clearly understand the merits of HadCRU bucket adjustment procedures before spending a lot of time and energy on modeling HadCRU temperatures in complicated models.

It starts the process of unwinding Folland's erroneous Pearl Harbour bucket adjustment, an adjustment that has been embedded in HadSST for nearly 20 years.

To make an accurate estimate of the impact, it was necessary to include the effect of the new insulated bucket adjustment — a point discussed at Climate Audit and which I would have included in any Climate Audit estimate.

Oceans also seem to have warmed, but there you get into the bucket adjustment debate.

Declaring the meta data unreliable implies an added * uncertainty * of the size of the ERI - bucket adjustment in the data.

So why does the NMAT adjustment get dropped in 1920 and switched in to a bucket adjustment.

When we're discussing Parker's «demonstration» on UHI, remember that Parker's previous claim to fame was his co-authorship of the Folland and Parker bucket adjustment see CA discussion and references here.

I'm not discussing the merits of the Folland canvas - wooden bucket adjustment pre-1941, but the schedule of the implementation of the engine inlet adjustment.

It's pretty amazing that they think that the uncertainty for bucket adjustment is less in 1865 than in 1938.

I don't think this issue is like a «SST bucket adjustment» or a TOBS adjustment or an adjustment for lapse rate due to altitude change.

# 33, Thomas L — It seems to me that Gavin was highlighting the wild - eyed speculation about «bucket adjustments» in the blogosphere.

data has no bucket adjustments, no «guessed» TOBS adjustments, no creating data from thin air, no dogmatic, policy - driven bias and it agrees with the independent sonde data.

Steve McIntyre also posts on this, entitled «Bucket adjustments: more bilge from RealClimate http://climateaudit.org/2011/07/11/more-misrepresentations-from-realclimate/

CA readers are aware that I discussed bucket adjustments on a number of occasions long before Thompson et al 2008, in particular, questioning the absurd IPCC assumption that all SST measurements switched from buckets to engine inlet on the -LSB-...]

By the way, do the data used for the temp anomaly in that video have any bucket adjustments for the ocean and any location adjustments for the land?

The coordinating lead authors of the section discussing Folland's bucket adjustments are Trenberth and Jones.

The MOHSST5 (Atlas 7) data, in which the Folland and Parker bucket adjustments are already embedded, was used in the Kaplan's «optimal estimation», which says:

To stay relevant — I am supremely indifferent to bucket adjustments in the lack of instrumental data on the oceans.

IPCC AR4 does not contain any mention of uncertainty attached to bucket adjustments, although that was an easily identified uncertainty that had been discussed here on several occasions.

Despite Schmidt's sniggering, it seems to me that I was entirely correct to raise the issue of bucket adjustments and correctly foresaw the direction of required adjustments long before the publication of Thompson et al..

Well, here we all are once again, discussing bucket adjustments.

CA readers are aware that I discussed bucket adjustments on a number of occasions long before Thompson et al 2008, in particular, questioning the absurd IPCC assumption that all SST measurements switched from buckets to engine inlet on the day after Pearl Harbour.

Steve: Geoff, the bucket adjustments have been an integral aspect to the global temperature history.

Climate Audit on Bucket Adjustments I've done a number of posts on bucket adjustments — which, as I've observed on a number of occasions — is a much under - discussed topic.

I've urged attention to bucket adjustments for many years and am glad that Hadley Center have re-visited this — it's now six years since the problems of the WW2 adjustments were first discussed at CA.

Steve, I think the first time i heard about problems with the bucket adjustments and dip in SST mid century was in 2005, I think Mike McCracken told me about this.

NASA blogger Gavin Schmidt has once again fabricated claims against Climate Audit's posts on bucket adjustments.

-LSB-...] and Engines, The Team and Pearl Harbor, Bucket Adjustments: More Bilge from RealClimate, Rasmus, the Chevalier and Bucket Adjustments, Did Canada switch from Engine Inlets in 1926 Back to -LSB-...]

My original issue with bucket adjustments was that they are quantitatively as large as the trend being measured and rest on a rather frail historic foundation.

As I observed in 2005, the bucket adjustments are as large as the trend being measured.

This episode definitely confirms my very first point on these bucket adjustments: whenever the adjustments are as as large the effect being measured, then there needs to be a replicable description and careful aassessment of all aspects of the adjustment process.]

re bucket adjustments I just can not believe that data from such an uncontrolled method could possibly be taken too seriously, at least to establish SST on a global basis.

The absurdity of Team bucket adjustments had been discussed in two early CA posts (here, here, here).

Bucket adjustments pretty much drop from sight in AR4.

Webster, for same time, has been very interested in the post-1950 blip and the potential impact of bucket adjustments.

This episode definitely confirms my very first point on these bucket adjustments: whenever the adjustments are as as large the effect being measured, then there needs to be a replicable description and careful assessment of all aspects of the adjustment process.

And far from the initial effort to show the potential effect being risible as Schmidt says, it showed that bucket adjustments might very well «matter» and my most recent thoughts seem rather prescient in retrospect.

As I had surmised in 2007, eliminating the erroneous handling of World War II bucket adjustments has a large impact on the previously - believed in decline in temperatures in the 1950s and 1960s.

Very early in CA history (for example here), I had pointed out the critical dependence of SST trends on «bucket adjustments».

The bucket adjustments were developed by Folland.

In December 2007, still long before Thompson et al, I discussed bucket adjustments again, noting the impact of the Folland adjustments on earlier work (referring to Paltridge and Woodruff 1981).

Here is what Lamb said about bucket adjustments in «Climate: Present, Past, and Future Vol.II» page 506 footnote 1:

Not exact matches

Imagine that this game is Bitcoin mining, and the change of size of the bucket is the difficultly level adjustment.

BUT if you happen to have bucket seats or don't have this adjustments, you can attempt to use a pillow placed under your sit bones and your low back to try to improve your hip angle.

The bucket seats have multiple adjustments for proper fit Read full review

Getting in is a challenge not only because of the concealed door handles but also due to the narrow door aperture and the restricted adjustment of the space - age bucket seat.

Variable Heated Reclining Front Bucket Seats - inc: adjustable front and rear headrests, whiplash - reducing active front headrests and 6 - way power driver's seat w / manual lumbar adjustment