The scientists» central projection is for a 0.2 % rise, but uncertainties inherent in these kind of carbon
budget calculations means fossil fuel emissions could fall by as much as 1 %, or rise by up to 1.8 %.
Not exact matches
Rules like the so - called comparability loophole — which allows districts to use average instead of actual teacher salaries for
budget calculations —
mean federal dollars are not getting to the schools and students who need them the most.
The whole idea of dealing with global
mean temperatures and averaged - out energy
budgets is by itself crude, and one commenter at least has noted that when an observed global warming of the order of 1C is small compared to the coarseness and sensitivity of such back of an envelope
calculations, we need to look elsewhere to resolve disputes.
Markitos, one thing is an energy
budget, which
meaning you can not understand, and another thing is a
calculation of the energy exchange between the surface and the atmosphere.
«The Planck feedback parameter [equivalent to κ — 1] is negative (an increase in temperature enhances the long - wave emission to space and thus reduces R [the Earth's radiation
budget]-RRB-, and its typical value for the earth's atmosphere, estimated from GCM
calculations (Colman 2003; Soden and Held 2006), is ~ 3.2 W m2ºK — 1 (a value of ~ 3.8 W m2ºK — 1 is obtained by defining [κ — 1] simply as 4σT3, by equating the global
mean outgoing long - wave radiation to σT4 and by assuming an emission temperature of 255 ºK).»