Sentences with phrase «build a new plant there»

Hyundai Motor group, which includes Kia, last week said it planned to lift U.S. investment by 50 % to $ 3.1 billion over five years and could build a new plant there.

Not exact matches

This solution is not completely new to the systems supplier, however; the Rockwell system has been used in servodrive technology on KHS filling systems since 2008 — firstly, because most of the plant engineering for the American market is built at the KHS production site in Waukesha in Wisconsin, USA, and secondly, because there was a market demand for it very early on.

On Tuesday I was in Geneva launching the new Nissan Compact which is to be built in Sunderland, one of the world's most productive car plants, creating 2000 new jobs, there and in the supply chain.

Senior officials at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) say there will be no «perverse incentives» to build new refrigerant plants simply to get credits linked to HFC 23s.

President - elect Donald Trump has vowed to revive the flagging U.S. coal industry, but a new analysis suggests cheap natural gas and falling prices for wind and solar power mean there are few places where it makes sense to build a new coal - fired power plant.

«If there is substantial natural gas leakage, then building new natural gas plants would lead to more near term climate damage than using the old dirty coal plants,» explained Caldeira.

«There were no new plants being constructed for decades, and now there is a new wave of building going on.&rThere were no new plants being constructed for decades, and now there is a new wave of building going on.&rthere is a new wave of building going on.»

British coal argued this week that there are no compelling reasons for the government to support the building of new nuclear plants.

By the time Yucca would be filled to capacity in 2036, there will still be at least the same amount of spent fuel still stored at the reaction sites, even if no new plants are built.

Ford pretty much confirmed this last April when it announced a $ 1.6 - billion investment in a new assembly plant south of the border, although it didn't say at the time which cars would be built there.

A new paint shop and a new assembly plant will be built ovet the next few years, while the existing body shop there is being enlarged.

Volvo's new plant in Charleston, South Carolina, isn't quite up and humming yet, but the company's next - generation S60 sedan, which is scheduled to be built there, will go without a diesel engine option.

The new Raptor will be built at Ford's Dearborn, Mich., truck plant and goes on sale fall 2016, so there's still plenty of time to beat on the current version.

And yes central power will be another piece (nuclear is great for baseload power... it operates at 90 % capacity factors even if the price of building a new plant has risen by 130 % since 2000) Centralized wind and solar will mature but then there's the transmission issue...

There's a clearly understood problem — China figured out they could claim carbon credits by building large new HCFC plants and destroying one of the byproducts, and selling the HCFCs for cheap third world air conditioners, and got away with that for some years.

When asked about the decision to build two new models at a plant about to close, a spokesperson for the company responded thusly: «Why not build them there, if we've got these large vehicles and they're going to get better fuel economy by adding a hybrid?»

If the USA had taken Hansen's advice back in the late 1980's and gone on a crash program of building next generation nukes there was probably a chance we could be exporting that technology now to China and India and it might have prevented the commissioning of many of the new coal power plants they are building.

I read one statistic that between China and India alone there will be 775 new coal burning power plants built in the next eight years.

Chris V. attempted to refute it @ 22:40, but his answer was much too provincial, limiting the discussion to only the U.S.. It's a big world out there, and he may be unaware that China is currently building an average of two new coal fired power plants every week, and plans to continue building at this pace until at least 2024 [source: the Economist].

There is a confusing picture in the energy debate about which technologies are the cheapest option, yet the world is clearly at a point where more renewables are getting built and there is uncertainty about new coal and gas plThere is a confusing picture in the energy debate about which technologies are the cheapest option, yet the world is clearly at a point where more renewables are getting built and there is uncertainty about new coal and gas plthere is uncertainty about new coal and gas plants.

Yang explained that, in fact, there has been a significant decline in the number of new coal plants being built.

There is no doubt that the global coal fleet is changing as older inefficient subcritical stations built decades ago in Europe and the US are being replaced by new, highly efficient plants in emerging economies like China, South and South - east Asia.

As a rule of thumb, a typical new - build reactor will generate about 1 gigawatt a year, so it appears there are quite a few new Chinese nuclear power plants on the drawing board.

CINS also questions aspects of the contract between China and Serbia, which it says gives courts in China full power of arbitration in the event of any dispute; there are added concerns about the many hundreds of workers from China building the new plant, with few companies from Serbia itself involved in construction at Kostolac.

Building on this critique, Speth goes on to conclude in his book that: (1) «today's system of political economy, referred to here as modern capitalism, is destructive of the environment, and not in a minor way but in a way that profoundly threatens the planet» (2) «the affluent societies have reached or soon will reach the point where, as Keynes put it, the economic problem has been solved... there is enough to go around» (3) «in the more affluent societies, modern capitalism is no longer enhancing human well - being» (4) «the international social movement for change — which refers to itself as «the irresistible rise of global anti-capitalism» — is stronger than many imagine and will grow stronger; there is a coalescing of forces: peace, social justice, community, ecology, feminism — a movement of movements» (5) «people and groups are busily planting the seeds of change through a host of alternative arrangements, and still other attractive directions for upgrading to a new operating system have been identified» (6) «the end of the Cold War... opens the door... for the questioning of today's capitalism.»

On Wednesday, a coalition of European energy companies announced that there would be no new coal plants built throughout the European Union after 2020, in an effort to meet goals set forth by the Paris climate agreement.

So it's no big shock that there's only one new nuclear power plant still being built in the United States — or that even existing power plants are struggling to stay competitive.

New nuclear generation has not been an option in many areas, as there have been prohibitive technical, environmental and political challenges associated with building and operating new nuclear planNew nuclear generation has not been an option in many areas, as there have been prohibitive technical, environmental and political challenges associated with building and operating new nuclear plannew nuclear plants.

Although there is much talk of building new nuclear plants in the United States, there are none under construction.

You may wonder whether there is already enough generating capacity without building new plants to replace coal with natural gas.

There is also no distinction made in the article between coal plants by unit age, LCOE or between new builds and existing infrastructure.

New coal plants are being built there, so if gas truly is better than coal despite fugitive emissions, then new gas has additional valNew coal plants are being built there, so if gas truly is better than coal despite fugitive emissions, then new gas has additional valnew gas has additional value.

The full panoply of what is already being done is hard to comprehend: there are coal - fired plants that are being supplemented with solar collectors to help boil the water during daylight hours; that extends the life of the plant, and reduces coal consumption, and does so at a lower cost than shutting down the plant and building something new in its place.

In case you don't know TED 2009 is going on in California: TreeHugger's own Graham Hill is in attendance, but one thing which caught my eye from the other side of the country was a slideshow on how to grow you own fresh air, using only three indoor plants: the Areca Palm, Mother - in - Law's Tongue (an unfortunately named plant if there every was one), and the Money Plant: After studying the effects these plants had on air quality for the past 15 years in a building in New Delhi, India it was found that there was a 42 % probability of increasing blood oxygen by 1 % simply by being in the building for one plant if there every was one), and the Money Plant: After studying the effects these plants had on air quality for the past 15 years in a building in New Delhi, India it was found that there was a 42 % probability of increasing blood oxygen by 1 % simply by being in the building for one Plant: After studying the effects these plants had on air quality for the past 15 years in a building in New Delhi, India it was found that there was a 42 % probability of increasing blood oxygen by 1 % simply by being in the building for one hour.

One medium - sized power plant could provide that, and if it's during the night, you won't even have to build a new power plant since there's more than enough extra capacity off peak.

There's a slim chance that if our nation pulled in one direction that we could get a decent portion of our electric generation out of new nuke plants 6 - 10 years from now if we start building like crazy now.

Where there is demand for new capacity, renewable plants = are = being built.

Nick Akins, president and CEO of the coal - heavy utility American Electric Power, has said flat out that «there will not be any new coal plants built, with the current price of gas and the forecast for the future for gas.»

Uncertainty over the pace at which new large dams or nuclear plants can be built means there is a strong reliance on solar and wind power.

So there will be no Conservation Corps planting trees and building new parks if he gets his way; no fixing of arts centers and museums.

There is no question that they are doing some pretty amazing things with waste to energy in Scandinavia, including having Bjark Ingells build new power plants that you can ski on.

In the shadow of the former General Motors plant in Shreveport, test drivers got a chance to try out a new vehicle that scheduled be built there in 2014.