As with fights under way over the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada, and plans to
build coal export terminals on U.S. coastlines, the new fossil fuel abundance is touching off a backlash among those alarmed by the consequences for climate change.
They are currently trying to
build coal export terminals along the Washington coast for coal bound for Asia.
For example, companies have been seeking permission to
build coal export terminals on the Pacific coast for several years.
The Yakama Nation and CRITFC also submitted comments to the State of Oregon's Department of State Lands on a state permit application to
build a coal export dock.
Communities in Oregon, Washington, and Northern California have risen up to resist proposals to
build coal export terminals in their midst.
We have successfully blocked every proposal to
build coal export infrastructure in the Pacific Northwest, save for one: a proposed terminal in Longview, Washington, that is on its last legs after it was denied certification by the state's Department of Ecology.
Not exact matches
Cloud Peak Energy also owns rights to substantial undeveloped
coal and complementary surface assets in the Northern PRB, further
building the Company's long - term position to serve Asian
export and domestic customers.
Native Americans have played the crucial role in this campaign to «keep it in the ground,» just as they were leaders in the successful struggle to block the Keystone XL Pipeline, the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline that would have carried dirty crude across Canada to the Pacific, and the
building of a massive
coal export port on Canada's Pacific coast.
I am impressed with Mr. Obama's statement; I will also create a Technology Transfer Program dedicated to
exporting climate - friendly technologies, including green
buildings, clean
coal and advanced automobiles, to developing countries to help them combat climate change.
If the USA had taken Hansen's advice back in the late 1980's and gone on a crash program of
building next generation nukes there was probably a chance we could be
exporting that technology now to China and India and it might have prevented the commissioning of many of the new
coal power plants they are
building.
If they're all
built, U.S.
coal exports would more than double from today's levels, according to developers» projections and federal data.
Companies are angling to
build two
export facilities in Washington State from which 100 million tons of
coal would be shipped to China, Japan and South Korea a year — about the same as what the United States
exports now from East Coast and Gulf ports.
It is also looking at
building a large
coal export facility in Oregon.
The second passed which called for a programmatic environmental impact statement to be conducted to study the potential impacts of
building coal -
exporting terminals throughout the Pacific Northwest, rather than one project - specific study looking at the Gateway Pacific Terminal project.
NCIG, which includes Peabody Energy, won a 2005 tender to
build a third terminal at the world's biggest
export harbor for power - station
coal, beating a bid by Port Waratah Coal Services Ltd., owner of the existing two termin
coal, beating a bid by Port Waratah
Coal Services Ltd., owner of the existing two termin
Coal Services Ltd., owner of the existing two terminals.
Greenpeace calls the technology a «false hope,» while the Natural Resources Defense Council cautions that CCS must be quickly developed in order to
export it to developing countries like China, which has been rapidly
building new
coal plants with few, if any, pollution controls.
«That U.S.
exports of LNG to China could end up being worse from a greenhouse gas perspective than if China simply
built a new power plant and burned its own
coal supplies.»
Located just two hours north of Portland, Oregon, along the Columbia River, the proposed terminal would ship a maximum of 44 million metric tons of
coal from the Western United States each year to markets overseas, making it, if
built, the largest
coal export terminal in the country.
At present, Queensland is
building Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) and thermal
coal export facilities along its ecologically valuable coastline.
In recent years,
coal companies have sought to quickly obtain permits to
build export terminals.
Fred is deeply concerned about proposals to
build the largest
coal export terminal in North America near Bellingham, Washington, and the herring spawning grounds of the Cherry Point Aquatic Reserve.
And when Obama is ousted new
coal exporting facilities will be
built and old ones expanded so hold on to your
coal stocks.
(3) Other cases are described on my Columbia University web site, e.g., Switzerland finances construction of
coal plants, Sweden
builds them, and Australia
exports coal and sets atmospheric carbon dioxide goals so large as to guarantee destruction of much of the life on the planet.
The project would be the first LNG
export facility ever
built so close to so many homes, the first
built in close proximity to Marcellus Shale fracking operations, and a potential trigger of more global warming pollution than all seven of Maryland's existing
coal - fired power plants combined.
I don't really want to rehash our last round, but it probably is worth pointing out for readers that even the
coal companies themselves say that the
coal isn't going anywhere — and hence won't get burned — if the WA
export terminals aren't
built.
Proponents also include Peabody Energy, which would mine the
coal for
export; Warren Buffett, who owns the railway that would carry the
coal; and SSA Marine, which runs ports around the world and wants to
build this one.
Fossil fuel giant PetroVietnam is in the process of
building the Long Phu 1
coal power plant in southern Vietnam and asked for international financial support from the U.S.
Export - Import Bank (Ex-Im).
Another massive
coal project proposed to be
built near the Sundarbans, the Rampal
coal plant, just secured financing from India's
Export - Import Bank.
Though
coal burning plants can not be
built in the province, because of climate change regulations, this does not prevent the province from
exporting coal.
SOCAR had informed its financiers, seven
export credit agencies, that the company had shelved its plan to
build a
coal power plant of 672 MW in Aliaga.