Sentences with phrase «build nuclear power plants so»

Not exact matches

So that leaves the question of proliferation, particularly as many countries in Asia begin to build new nuclear power plants, ranging from the United Arab Emirates to Vietnam.

So, the nuclear solution is two decades away, and then they will risk being more expensive than alternative which will reduce costs in the four decades between now and when new nuclear power plants will still have two decades of debt service on labor costs for building nuclear two to three decades earlier.

As a rule of thumb, a typical new - build reactor will generate about 1 gigawatt a year, so it appears there are quite a few new Chinese nuclear power plants on the drawing board.

So it's no big shock that there's only one new nuclear power plant still being built in the United States — or that even existing power plants are struggling to stay competitive.

So premise of such study would be the fact that that government would waving these environmental laws and also be looking a way to streamline governmental approval, so that it's the actual construction time which is the limiting factor and not the court cases, approval process which adding all the time to building nuclear power plantSo premise of such study would be the fact that that government would waving these environmental laws and also be looking a way to streamline governmental approval, so that it's the actual construction time which is the limiting factor and not the court cases, approval process which adding all the time to building nuclear power plantso that it's the actual construction time which is the limiting factor and not the court cases, approval process which adding all the time to building nuclear power plants.

The first generation of nuclear power plants proved so costly to build that half of them were abandoned during construction.

The high cost of nuclear power also explains why so few plants are being built compared with a generation ago.

They clearly can not replace the electricity from their nuclear reactors with electricity from wind and solar, so they are building new coal - fired power plants and importing coal from the US: that's the «smutzig» part.

Renewable energy advocates responded that the Breakthrough findings had to be wrong because it takes so much longer to build a nuclear power plant — with much of the protracted timeframes owing to construction delays — than, say, a solar or wind farm.

Given the entrenched political power of the nuclear industry — as reflected in the Obama administration's continued support for huge subsidies for new nuclear, Fukushima be damned — it is possible that one or two new nuclear power plants may be built in the USA in the next decade or so.

-- actually lint might be a benificial addition to soil...), crop residues, spoiled and damaged crops and food, used paper pr - odu - cts, sewage, landfills and manure — it's probably impractable to hook up a pipeline directly to a cow but maybe we can feed it B - e-a-n-o or something:)-RRB- come down so much that they cut the nuclear renaissance short, perhaps before it ever takes off (given the time it takes to plan and build a nuclear power plant, unless that changes too).

It might have been better to keep Germany's existing nuclear power plants operational and do a thorough safety review so that they can be used until a transition to renewables can be done directly (without having to build a large amount of new fossil fuel plants).

So Australia is not going to build nuclear power plants for $ 1,000 a kilowatt.