Sentences with phrase «build oil pipelines»

Industry groups say the president's plan, which he's set to expand Tuesday, would raise prices on construction materials, making it more expensive to build oil pipelines, bridges, highways, homes, and schools.

The company building an oil pipeline that has been subject to sustained public protests said on Thursday it has resumed drilling beneath a North Dakota lake despite a last - ditch legal challenge from a Native American tribe leading the opposition.

Most recently he's has spoken against a now - delayed plan to build an oil pipeline from Canada to refineries along the Gulf of Mexico..

In 1998, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan signed an agreement to build an oil pipeline from the Caspian Sea across Georgia and Turkey to western markets; this pipeline would go from Baku (in Azerbaijan) via Tbilisi (in Georgia) to Ceyhan (in Turkey).

Not exact matches

For decades, Enbridge built the world's largest network of oil and liquids pipelines without the public even noticing.

«We don't want these new projects to have to bear the burden of some of these (oil price) differentials,» he said, reiterating Suncor's commitment to build no new major oilsands projects without new pipelines.

Native Americans march to a burial ground sacred site that was disturbed by bulldozers building the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL), near the encampment where hundreds of people have gathered to join the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe's protest of the oil pipeline that is slated to cross the Missouri River nearby, Sept. 4, 2016 near Cannon Ball, North Dakota.

There has been a lot of money and effort put into building pipelines to transport oil from Alberta to the Pacific coast.

Take, for example, a Chinese company that wants to build a pipeline to the B.C. coast to export oil to China.

Victoria businessman David Black has thrown yet another log on the fiery debate over Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline with his proposal to build a $ 13 - billion oil refinery on the province's northern coast.

That's despite the fact premiers Christy Clark and Alison Redford, in a backgrounder to their recent agreement on the ground rules for building pipelines, warned that oil may end up crossing B.C. by train en route to Asia regardless of whether the Northern Gateway or Trans - Mountain Expansion projects go ahead.

TransCanada Corp. has enough customer interest to go forward with the Keystone XL oil pipeline, if the company decides to build it.

America might be on its way to become a net oil exporter, but there's no reason why this should get in the way of building pipelines that connect different types of oil plays to the refiners best equipped to turn their crude into the petroleum products that feed North America's economy and the world's.

So the pipeline is being built by an American company to help small - to - medium sized American oil companies transport American oil to American refineries in the Midwest for American drivers.

The accident, though, will likely shift the U.S. debate over Keystone away from whether or not building the pipeline would have any significant impact on greenhouse gases (the U.S. State Department says it won't, environmentalists disagree), to whether or not Western Canada's oil is a particularly hazardous fuel.

CNBC's Jackie DeAngelis reports on pipeline companies working to build out infrastructure within our borders that could move more oil than Keystone.

Hence the drive to build pipelines and export terminals to the Pacific Ocean is becoming for Canada's oil and gas industry an existential quest.

American pipeline company Kinder Morgan's announcement that it will expand its Trans - Mountain oil pipeline to 850,000 barrels a day confirms something pipeline watchers have been quietly saying for a while: it will likely beat Enbridge in the race to build a big oilsands export pipeline to the Pacific.

This year has seen a spate of homegrown proposals, including Eagle Spirit Energy, a partnership between First Nations and Vancouver's Aquilini family which would build a crude oil (as opposed to bitumen) pipeline to Prince Rupert from Alberta, and Vancouver - based Steelhead LNG.

Not only are oil producers trying to back out from Alberta Clipper, but Enbridge itself has battled an effort by TransCanada Corp. to build another major pipeline, called Keystone XL, to export crude to the U.S..

Texas pipeline company Kinder Morgan issued an ultimatum yesterday: give our shareholders confidence that we can build the Trans Mountain oil tanker project, or we're walking.

Ultimately, though, the State Department finds that an increase in the amount of oil moved by rail will allow new oil sands production to come on - stream whether or not new pipelines are built.

U.S. oil and natural gas production from Pennsylvania could help power Ontario and Quebec for instance, even as Canadian shale flowed through pipelines from Alberta to the U.S. Infrastructure matters a lot in these settings, especially given the difficulties most companies are facing in building new pipelines (Exhibit A: see the Dakota Access Pipeline).

As more pipelines are built to take oil to a coast, North American prices will continue to merge with global oil markets.

Canada's energy industry is skeptical that major new pipelines can be built in Canada unless the feds make it easier to win approval, and that gives oil producers headaches about planning for future production.

But a majority of Americans, Republican lawmakers and construction union members welcomed the prospect of boosting reliance on a firm U.S. ally for new supplies of the heavy crude, which would be shipped by a pipeline built largely in this country and processed at Gulf Coast refineries uniquely capable of dealing with the low - grade oil.

He signed a separate order that invited TransCanada to resubmit its application to build the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Alberta to Nebraska.

EDMONTON — Alberta Premier Rachel Notley says the province will buy the Trans Mountain oil pipeline project if that's what it takes to get it built.

«In the future, companies may try to get around the environmental approval process by seeking approval to build a natural gas pipeline, then converting it into a pipeline for transporting heavy oil.

The Iraqi Oil Ministry and the Iranian Oil Ministry have signed a memorandum of understanding to bury their differences on joint oil fields and build a pipeline to export crude oil from the Kirkuk fields, in the north of Iraq, through Iran, reported the Al MonitOil Ministry and the Iranian Oil Ministry have signed a memorandum of understanding to bury their differences on joint oil fields and build a pipeline to export crude oil from the Kirkuk fields, in the north of Iraq, through Iran, reported the Al MonitOil Ministry have signed a memorandum of understanding to bury their differences on joint oil fields and build a pipeline to export crude oil from the Kirkuk fields, in the north of Iraq, through Iran, reported the Al Monitoil fields and build a pipeline to export crude oil from the Kirkuk fields, in the north of Iraq, through Iran, reported the Al Monitoil from the Kirkuk fields, in the north of Iraq, through Iran, reported the Al Monitor.

How can it be that blocking the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion — which, if built, will almost assuredly increase the GHG emissions from Alberta's oil sands — would undermine Canada's climate change plan?

The Alberta government has introduced legislation that would give it the power to restrict the export of natural gas, crude oil and refined products as part of its effort to ensure the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion gets built.

In other words the cheapest and most sensible approach to reducing greenhouse gases from current 732 megatonnes to a 2020 target of 620 megatonnes involves shrinking the oil and gas industry by limiting bitumen extraction, and not building more pipelines.

It is likely these projects will be built, and with them there will be a 13 per cent surplus of export pipeline capacity, without the Trans Mountain project, when western Canadian oil production peaks in the 2025 timeframe.

Canada needs to build those pipelines that can link her rich oil and gas fields to tidewater.

Deeper reading: CCPA, «Can Canada expand oil and gas production, build pipelines, and keep its climate change commitments?»

gas pipeline across Canada 3) Harper could have built the crude oil pipeline across Canada My question to you is as follows... Generally speaking, I am in favour of governmental decisions that are biased in favour of big business because they are more likely to invest and expand business and as a corollory will produce more jobs and increase prosperity.

Oil companies wanted the Alaskan pipeline built.

The EFCC added that the second suspect, Dakoru Atukpa, who is also executive director, projects, at Oneplus, claimed to have used the funds for demobilization of pipeline vandals, peace - building initiatives and easing of oil production through the NNPC LNG projects in Olokola and Brass in 2014.

«To build a pipeline across America with foreign steel that takes Canadian oil and transports it abroad, while only creating 35 permanent jobs, does foreign nations far more good than it does the U.S.,» Schumer said last month.

Two companies that own oil terminals in Albany denied any plans to work with a developer seeking to build a controversial pipeline from Albany to New Jersey.

With the green light from the federal government, the company building the Dakota Access oil pipeline said it plans to resume work immediately to finish the long - stalled project.

The 178 - mile pipeline, if built, would run from Albany to Linden, N.J., carrying crude oil south and refined products north, largely along the New York State Thruway right - of - way.

The double pipeline would be built between Albany and Linden, N.J., with 200,000 gallons of crude oil per day moving south and the same volume of refined products north.

The bill would require sponsors of border - crossing oil pipelines and electricity transmission facilities that cross the U.S. borders into Canada and Mexico to receive a «certificate of crossing» from the relevant federal agency in order to build or modify their projects.

Until recently, expanding and building pipelines was not terribly controversial, as most people agreed that there was a common need to transport oil and gas for fuel and electricity.

To pay for this expensive proposition, each of the pollutants gets turned into a product: sulfur into sulfuric acid for the pulp and paper industry, nitrogen into ammonia for agriculture and carbon into pure CO2 for oil companies, traveling down a new specially built pipeline 60 miles to interconnect with the existing network.

Since 1999 the largest enhanced oil recovery (EOR) company operating in Mississippi, Denbury, estimates it has spent more than $ 5 billion to build and operate oil facilities and pipelines using CO2 in the Magnolia State alone.

Even all the oil reservoirs in the world could not handle the more than 13 billion metric tons of CO2 that come from burning coal each year, even if pipelines and the rest could be built.

Yet businesses, including oil and gas companies or mining firms looking north, face risks including that permafrost will thaw and ruin ice roads, buildings and pipelines.