Not exact matches
Yes,
science does
build upon itself but when
science discovers a long held notion is bunk, it's not because it was right and then it was
wrong.
Science history: elements are the smallest
building blocks (
wrong).
Science can be wrong, science can be influenced by politics... but it has a built in mechinism to change when it is wrong... does religion hav
Science can be
wrong,
science can be influenced by politics... but it has a built in mechinism to change when it is wrong... does religion hav
science can be influenced by politics... but it has a
built in mechinism to change when it is
wrong... does religion have that?
«This information yields new insights into how sperm stem cells function and develop under normal circumstances,» says the study's lead author Bradley Cairns, PhD, senior director of basic
science at HCI and professor and chair of oncological
sciences at the U of U. «We have
built a very important framework we can now use to help us understand what happens when things go
wrong, resulting in issues like infertility and cancer in men.»
It's not an exact
science, but it helps us mitigate the risk of
building the
wrong thing, plus ensures that the end user is always at the centre of our conversations.
He asked the
Science philosopher how to do that with String Theory, to which he condescended: «Well, you could
build a linear accelerator between here and Alpha Centauri, and if a cow came out the other end you would know String Theory is
wrong.»