Not exact matches
Except, again, that the
doctrines you are espousing are
built more on
doctrines developed
by men over the last 2000 years than on what the bible actually says.
Now, if you want to take your favourite sin and insert it into the meaning, go ahead, but don't expect anybody to be fooled
by your assertions and don't expect anybody to be convinced of your
doctrine that you
build on such a shaky foundation.
Thus his conclusion on Williams» project: «
Building on insights first developed
by Beard, he unearthed the assumptions underlying the
doctrine of liberal internationalism, explained its logic, identified its purposes, and divined its implications.
Would God say, «No, I am not going to listen to the prayers of such and such a group, because they wiped out nations in my name, because they
build unjust social structures in my name, because they have gone to war in my name, because they don't call me
by the «right» name, or simply because their
doctrines do not quite correspond to who I am»?
And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds [c] and teachers, [d] 12 to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for
building up the body of Christ, 13 until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, [e] to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, 14 so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro
by the waves and carried about
by every wind of
doctrine,
by human cunning,
by craftiness in deceitful schemes.
Some speak in individual terms of the cultivation of the Christian life or the salvation of souls; others state their goal to be the
building up of the corporate life of the Church or of some part of it; again the goal is defined as the «communication of the vital and redeeming
doctrines of Scriptures,» or it is otherwise described
by reference to the Bible as the ultimate source of all that is to be taught and preached.
If this were all Whitehead meant
by perception in the mode of causal efficacy, he would merely be describing a commonplace experience of which we are all aware, and his
doctrine would be philosophically innocuous; in fact it would not be able to sustain the weight of the philosophical edifice he
builds upon it.
11And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherdsc and teachers, d 12to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for
building up the body of Christ, 13until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, e to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, 14so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro
by the waves and carried about
by every wind of
doctrine,
by human cunning,
by craftiness in deceitful schemes.
Moreover, since his concern as a teacher was to root
doctrine in the inmost affection of the heart, he learned from the rhetorical tradition recovered
by Erasmus and Budé how to use language to move the hearts and affections of his readers so that their piety might be
built up within them.
St Bernard makes an important point for readers of Faith, «The beams (of the
building — cf. Song 1:4) are the supporting structure of
doctrine and regulations that prevent weakening of the structure
by individuals.
Paul again in Ephesians: 11 And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherdsc and teachers, 12 to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for
building up the body of Christ, 13 until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, 14 so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro
by the waves and carried about
by every wind of
doctrine,
by human cunning,
by craftiness in deceitful schemes.
Building a book - length argument around his contention that «the seventeenth century is the moment when one world - view was displaced
by another because the scientific displaced that of faith,» Grayling paints a picture of astronomers, mathematicians, medical doctors, and even alchemists often reaching conclusions that even they dearly hoped weren't true — because the answers meant opposing Christian
doctrine, unwise if you wanted to keep your job, freedom or head... To my ear, though, the tone of the Grayling's prose is rather flat — think «textbook» and you've pretty much got it — so many of these unexpected sidelights are not presented as compellingly or dramatically as one might hope.
* S: (n) analogy (an inference that if things agree in some respects they probably agree in others) * S: (n) analogy (drawing a comparison in order to show a similarity in some respect) «the operation of a computer presents and interesting analogy to the working of the brain»; «the models show
by analogy how matter is
built up» * S: (n)
doctrine of analogy, analogy (the religious belief that between creature and creator no similarity can be found so great but that the dissimilarity is always greater; language can point in the right direction but any analogy between God and humans will always be inadequate)»
AI might be particularly useful as a way of
building that argument, such as
by demonstrating a pattern of inefficient results from existing
doctrine, or detecting strong social objection to an existing law.
The court also stated that the
doctrine of caveat emptor also barred any claims
by the Buyers, as the Buyers completed the transaction without obtaining the
building permit at their own peril.