Sentences with phrase «burning embers»
The phrase "burning embers" refers to the hot, glowing remains of a fire after the flames have died down. Full definition
Schnellnhuber talks about the increase in concern with temperature increase since 2001: burning embers diagram: 2 °C increase no longer considered safe.
pathsoflight.us
These fuels were most likely the source of burning embers that high winds propelled into the devastated residential areas.
This sleek, black fireplace features a classic look, including burning ember logs and dancing orange flames.
Elle: Well, you could think about it as like trying to cook something over a fire with no wood and like slow burning embers, you know what I mean?
No issues with burning embers being sucked into roof vents in wild fire areas.
Goodbye Hockey Stick, hello Burning Embers?
Relationships between various impacts reflected in each RFC and increases in global mean temperature (GMT) were portrayed in what has come to be called the «burning embers diagram.»
Beside your burning embers [1], set two bricks a foot apart so their longest, skinniest sides are on the hearth [2].
The Arturo Vidal to Manchester United saga rumbles on, it would seem, with the Daily Star reporting that the Red Devils are ready to reignite their interest in the Chilean international midfielder come January by offering playmaker Juan Mata to the Turin giants in a part exchange deal, after the Spaniard was linked with a move to the Old Lady as the burning embers of the summer transfer window were extinguished.
She'd roll one herself — «huge,» Rodriguez tells me, holding out his hands half a foot apart to indicate the size — light it, then turn it around and take a drag from the burning embers.
Burning embers from the bark of trees were carried aloft by shifting winds and updrafts of the fire's own convection currents for up to 20 miles, jumping across roads, clearing fire breaks, and starting new blazes on the parched ground.
Schneider and his colleagues updated a graph, dubbed the «burning embers,» that is designed to map the risks of damage from global warming.
With a larger sample, planets at varying stages of atmospheric loss will be found that confirm whether or not the majority of close in rocky planets are the burnt embers leftover of gas giants who ventured to close to their host stars.
Early estimates for dangerous global warming based on the «burning embers» approach [1], [19]--[20] have been recognized as probably being too conservative [77].
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [1], [19] summarized broad - based assessments with a «burning embers» diagram, which indicated that major problems begin with global warming of 2 — 3 °C.
If you put your phone under one of those lights, you'd drop it like it was a burning ember.
As they come out of their hopeful chrysalis, legacy publishers will spread their wings just enough to fly above the still - burning embers of the old publishing world, while rising high enough to see a new horizon.
The burning embers incarnate the perpetual desire to go from spark to flame.
Everything from Orthodox hymns in the imposing Alexander Nevsky Cathedral to mural frescos in the cathedral crypt, to the most ancient mysterious ritual of barefooted dancers performing on burning embers and the unique atmosphere of Sofia Music Week is on offer.
However, Washburn diverts those narratives to her own outcomes through the use of materials such as hair, wool, bubble wrap, bottle mouths and burning embers.
After I wrote about how the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change created and then dropped the «burning embers» diagram showing how environmental risk rises with emissions and time, some readers said it was horribly ineffective in any case.
Similarly, the famous «burning embers» figure from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) says exactly the same thing — if it is some natural ecosystems that you care about then we are already way past the point of no return, if it is Greenland or parts of West Antarctica then the «guardrail» is different (but also, it seems, beyond us).
Back in February, when I wrote about the «burning embers» diagram of climate risk that was left out of the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a reader, Josh J. of Snow Hill, N.C., gave the artwork this review:
In 2001, when the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change produced its third set of reports examining the causes and consequences of global warming, it included a fascinating illustration, called the «burning embers» diagram, showing gradients of rising risk with rising temperatures.
Stephen H. Schneider of Stanford, one of the authors of the new «burning embers» paper on climate risk and an author on I.P.C.C. reports from the beginning, told me that we one can only hope that the sensitivity of the climate system to greenhouse gases is on the low end.
The diagram, known as «burning embers,» is an updated version of one that was a central feature of the panel's preceding climate report in 2001.
Just in case you think this is new, review the posts here about the «burning embers» diagram from the 2001 intergovernmental panel report and the realities behind the oversimplified notion of climate tipping points.
«Some of the scientists (including some senior functionaries) involved» in the report «were dubious about the scientific validity of the burning embers diagram, and I just could not push it through,» he said.
The report takes the approach used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in its «reasons for concern» section and the diagram known as «burning embers» — both of which essentially illustrate how rising temperatures equate with rising risk in a variety of areas that matter to society.
The purpose of the panel's «burning embers» diagram was to convey how dangers build without telling governments which point was excessive.
One way to communicate the fuzzyness of the variables determining the «Reasons for concern» about climate change is to use smooth gradients of colours, varying continuously from green to red (see IPCC, 2001a, Figure SPM 2, also known as the «burning embers» diagram).
Figure 2 The «burning embers» diagram showing 2001 and revised 2009 assessments of risks of impacts associated with varying degrees of warming
Early estimates for dangerous global warming based on the «burning embers» approach [1], [19]--[20] have been recognized as probably being too conservative [77].
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [1], [19] summarized broad - based assessments with a «burning embers» diagram, which indicated that major problems begin with global warming of 2 — 3 °C.
It's probably fairly safe to assume that he didn't pick any of those IPCC scientists who were «dubious about the scientific validity of the burning embers diagram».
If Schneider was thinking that the burning embers diagram might achieve the sort of influence enjoyed by the hockeystick, he'll be disappointed with its impact so far.
Revkin provides some interesting background on why the Burning Embers diagram didn't make it into AR4: