Sentences with phrase «business at a value price»

«We're looking for a growth business at a value price.»

Portfolio Manager Interview An Interview With Patrick J. English, Portfolio Manager, FMI Common Stock Fund Investing in the mid caps: A search for good businesses at value prices.

Not exact matches

You obviously know your business better than the celebrity knows your business so definitely challenge pricing if it does not seem of at least equal value (or value in your favor).

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

Past looks at the value of GE's individual businesses — also known as a «sum - of - the - parts» analysis — cast doubt on whether a fire sale of GE's assets would even fetch today's price at $ 13.28 per share.

«We're looking for a growth business but at a value price.»

These businesses delivered an average internal rate of return of 14.4 per cent, if priced at «fair value» at that date.

«Amazon has algorithms and crawlers that go out and find the lowest prices and create this giant sucking sound, and they've taken it offline and effectively created a transfer in value from taxpayers to Amazon,» said Scott Galloway, professor of marketing at New York University's Stern School of Business told CNBC on Thursday.

Analyst Josh Sullivan at Sterne Agee CRT said that while Alcoa's value - added businesses gained ground in the aerospace and automotive markets during the third quarter, declines in premiums and alumina pricing keeps him cautious on the company, and prompted him to cut his 2015 EPS estimate this week to 71 cents from 83 cents and his 2016 outlook to 72 cents from 90 cents.

The initial public offering price for our common stock will be determined through our negotiations with the underwriters and may not bear any relationship to the market price at which our common stock will trade after this offering or to any other established criteria of the value of our business.

Another year, another dead Canadian tech giant. Blackberry was sold yesterday for scrap to the Toronto private equity firm Fairfax. The purchase price of $ 4.7 billion is essentially valued at its cash of $ 2.6 billion and the value of its patents. Blackberryâ $ ™ s active businesses are being valued at essentially nothing. If Fairfax can stop the -LSB-...]

The future value of our Class A common stock will depend to a large degree on our business and financial performance, and we can not assure you that the price of our Class A common stock will equal or exceed the price at which our securities have traded on these private secondary markets.

Morgan Stanley has agreed to buy the rest of its brokerage joint venture from Citigroup Inc over time at a price that values the business at $ 13.5 billion, a victory for Morgan Stanley and far lower than the $ 22 billion that Citigroup had originally sought.

The value of iPhones sold was calculated at more than the enterprise value - the price minus cash - of Nokia's handset business, sold to Microsoft for $ 5.4 bn earlier in September.

We developed StarterEssentials to give new or young businesses the edge they need to succeed and grow packaged at a value bundled price.

Pursuant to the policy, as revised in February 2009, at each annual meeting of our stockholders, provided that the director has served on the Board for at least six months prior to the annual meeting, a non-employee director would be granted RSUs having a value equal to $ 225,000 divided by the lesser of (i) the trailing average closing trading prices of our common stock for the 180 - day period preceding and ending with the date of the RSU grant or (ii) such number of RSUs as the Board may determine based on additional criteria such as business conditions and / or company performance, outside director compensation practices at peer companies and advice from outside compensation consultants.

Unless the participating employee has previously withdrawn from the offering, his or her accumulated payroll deductions will be used to purchase shares on the last business day of the offering period at a price equal to 85 % of the fair market value of the shares on the first business day or the last business day of the offering period, whichever is lower.

«Morgan Stanley has agreed to buy the rest of its brokerage joint venture from Citigroup Inc over time at a price that values the business at $ 13.5 billion»

«When a company raises money, say 3 or 4 hundred million by placing new shares, the price at which those shares were placed is used to upvalue all the shares, thus valuing the business at $ 20 billion.

Given the absence of a public trading market of our common stock, and in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Accounting and Valuation Guide, Valuation of Privately - Held Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation, our board of directors exercised reasonable judgment and considered numerous and subjective factors to determine the best estimate of fair value of our common stock, including independent third - party valuations of our common stock; the prices at which we sold shares of our convertible preferred stock to outside investors in arms - length transactions; the rights, preferences, and privileges of our convertible preferred stock relative to those of our common stock; our operating results, financial position, and capital resources; current business conditions and projections; the lack of marketability of our common stock; the hiring of key personnel and the experience of our management; the introduction of new products; our stage of development and material risks related to our business; the fact that the option grants involve illiquid securities in a private company; the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public offering or a sale of our company given the prevailing market conditions and the nature and history of our business; industry trends and competitive environment; trends in consumer spending, including consumer confidence; and overall economic indicators, including gross domestic product, employment, inflation and interest rates, and the general economic outlook.

We invest in companies that we believe are priced at a substantial discount to our estimate of their true business value.

The Dutch company said the price valued its business, known as Lumileds, at $ 2 billion, including debt, and that Philips» remaining stake would be held in the form of preference shares.

Priced at just over 11x expected 2012 earnings (plus goodwill amortization), Parker is valued like other highly cyclical businesses.

We do believe, however, that business values increased more than stock prices, so we begin 2012 enthusiastic that stocks are now priced at an even larger discount to our value estimates.

Our research team works to identify companies that are priced at a substantial discount to what we consider to be their underlying business value — what a rational investor would pay to own the entire business — and then we patiently wait for the gap between price and value to narrow.

The share price has fallen considerably from when we eliminated the position in the second quarter of 2014 when the business was valued at over 15x 2014 earnings, and we believe the business is now attractively valued at a below - average multiple of 11x expected 2015 earnings.

When a business is trading at a lower price than several proven value investors (including Mr. Buffett) last bought shares, it is usually a good place to start your research.

He looks to buy these businesses at low prices of course, but often times he pays a price that leave many value investors scratching their heads (i.e. paying over 20 times earnings for Heinz, and 20 % more than the stock's all time high).

To us, buying great businesses at average prices is just as much value investing as is buying average businesses at great prices.

In any case, I doubt that anyone who has bought BitGold shares at prices above C$ 4 has done a realistic calculation of the business's value as either a standalone enterprise or as an add - on to a larger financial services company.

As these examples show, at the right price, growth businesses are value stocks.

The stock price should be loosely tethered to the business value over time, but volatility around that value gives us the chance to buy at a discount and sell at a premium» Wally Weitz

What Munger is talking about above (in addition to the importance of humility) is the idea that a business with superior quality bought at the right price can still be a bargain consistent with the principles of value investing.

In our view, Moody's is a great business with growing profits, run by a management team we've known and respected for years, and the shares trade at a price that is well below our estimate of intrinsic value.

When a stock is priced at a premium to its business value, risk is high.

Treasury, which also owns Rosemount, Lindemans, Wynns and Wolf Blass, revealed earlier on Wednesday that the impairments comprised write downs of historical prices paid for wine businesses before Treasury was de-merged from Foster's in 2011 plus a string of winery assets and infrastructure at the lower - priced commercial end of the market which have shrunk in value.

You can be confident that your product has sold at the market price, and focus your attention on creating additional value for your business.

Vardy Mahrez Ulloa valued at half the price of Wellbeck did the business up front.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Away from the track, like it says on the box, the RC F is a swift, satisfying grand touring coupe that looks the business and has the engine and handling performance, comfort, refinement and stability to match, at a great value price.

Awards: * 2012 IIHS Top Safety Pick * 2012 Best Resale Value Awards * 2012 10 Best Sedans Under $ 25,000 * 2012 10 Most Comfortable Cars Under $ 30, Toyota Camry LE White * Doing Business the Old - Fashioned Way, One satisfied Customer at a time * Advertised prices exclude tax, tag, registration, title, and $ 80.00 documentation fee.

Awards: * JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study * 2014 IIHS Top Safety Pick * 2014 10 Best Hybrids Under $ 30,000 * 2014 10 Best Used Family Cars Under $ 15,000 * 2014 10 Best Late - Model Used Cars Under $ 15,000 * 2014 Best Resale Value Awards 2014 Toyota Camry LE Black * Doing Business the Old - Fashioned Way, One satisfied Customer at a time * Advertised prices exclude tax, tag, registration, title, and $ 80.00 documentation fee.

The Honda HR - V was originally introduced in Japan as the Honda Vezel in 2013 but at that time, a weak Rupee value and the high price of the vehicle didn't make a business case for the market, which led them to introduce the BR - V that didn't stand a chance with the Mahindra Scorpio and the Hyundai Creta.

Awards: * JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study * 2014 IIHS Top Safety Pick * 2014 10 Best Late - Model Used Cars Under $ 15,000 * 2014 10 Best Hybrids Under $ 30,000 * 2014 10 Best Used Family Cars Under $ 15,000 * 2014 Best Resale Value Awards 2014 Toyota Camry SE White * Doing Business the Old - Fashioned Way, One satisfied Customer at a time * Advertised prices exclude tax, tag, registration, title, and $ 80.00 documentation fee.

Awards: * JD Power Initial Quality Study (IQS) * 2017 IIHS Top Safety Pick * 2017 10 Most Comfortable Cars Under $ 30,000 * 2017 10 Best Sedans Under $ 25,000 * 2017 10 Most Awarded Brands * 2017 Best Resale Value Awards 2017 Toyota Camry LE White * Doing Business the Old - Fashioned Way, One satisfied Customer at a time * Advertised prices exclude tax, tag, registration, title, and $ 80.00 documentation fee.

Awards: * JD Power Initial Quality Study (IQS) * 2017 IIHS Top Safety Pick * 2017 10 Most Comfortable Cars Under $ 30,000 * 2017 10 Best Sedans Under $ 25,000 * 2017 10 Most Awarded Brands * 2017 Best Resale Value Awards 2017 Toyota Camry LE Gray * Doing Business the Old - Fashioned Way, One satisfied Customer at a time * Advertised prices exclude tax, tag, registration, title, and $ 80.00 documentation fee.

Awards: * JD Power Initial Quality Study (IQS) * 2015 Best Resale Value Awards 2015 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner V6 Silver Sky Metallic * Doing Business the Old - Fashioned Way, One satisfied Customer at a time * Advertised prices exclude tax, tag, registration, title, and $ 80.00 documentation fee.

Awards: * JD Power Initial Quality Study (IQS) * 2017 IIHS Top Safety Pick * 2017 10 Best Sedans Under $ 25000 * 2017 10 Most Comfortable Cars Under $ 30000 * 2017 Best Resale Value Awards * 2017 10 Most Awarded Brands 2017 Toyota Camry SE Black * Doing Business the Old - Fashioned Way One satisfied Customer at a time * Advertised prices exclude tax tag registration title and $ 80.00 documentation fee.

Awards: * JD Power Dependability Study * 2013 IIHS Top Safety Pick * 2013 Best Resale Value Awards * 2013 Brand Image Awards 2013 Toyota Sienna LE 8 Passenger Green * Doing Business the Old - Fashioned Way, One satisfied Customer at a time * Advertised prices exclude tax, tag, registration, title, and $ 80.00 documentation fee.

Awards: * 2010 Top 10 Green Cars * 2010 Best Resale Value Awards 2010 Toyota Prius I * Doing Business the Old - Fashioned Way, One satisfied Customer at a time * Advertised prices exclude tax, tag, registration, title, and $ 80.00 documentation fee.