Represented an Alabama company against wrongful interference with its rock quarry
business in a jury trial in Scottsboro, Alabama resulted in a multi-million dollar jury verdict for the client.
Not exact matches
Hanging over state
business are both the federal corruption
trial of Governor Andrew Cuomo's former top aide, Joe Percoco, which is now
in jury deliberations after closing arguments last week and this year's state - level elections, including the race for governor.
Jury selection is expected to continue Tuesday
in the corruption
trial of Skelos, who is facing federal charges that he extorted bribes from companies with
business before the state.
On January 8,
jury selection is scheduled to start
in the
trial of Cuomo's former close confidant and aide Joe Percoco, along with three construction and energy executives who had
business before the state and are accused of arranging bribes for Percoco and his wife
in exchange for Percoco's government influence.
He has argued before the Alabama Supreme Court on several occasions and has handled
jury trials in many different areas, ranging from personal injury / wrongful death to complex
business disputes.
During his 40 years of practice, Sam has handled
jury trials in many different areas, ranging from personal injury / wrongful death to complex
business disputes.
However, the appellate court
in Linafelt allowed the employee to have another
jury trial on the issue of tortious interference with an advantageous
business relationship.
His experience as lead counsel
in over 100
jury and non-
jury trials and as a former prosecutor
in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, combined with his knowledge of substantive real estate law, afford him a unique vantage point from which to counsel his clients, whether they are lending institutions,
business or real property owners, or title insurers.
He is an ardent litigator, serving as lead counsel
in numerous civil
jury trials involving medical - malpractice, contract disputes, defamation and related
business torts, shareholder disputes (e.g., tortious interference with
business relationship, trade secret, and non-compete violations), shareholder and LLC disputes and their fiduciary obligations, real - estate litigation, construction litigation, and creditors rights» issues and related bankruptcy and receivership issues.
In 2011, Mike represented an Alabama company forced out of business by the predatory annexation and zoning of property by a city in a jury trial in Huntsville, Alabam
In 2011, Mike represented an Alabama company forced out of
business by the predatory annexation and zoning of property by a city
in a jury trial in Huntsville, Alabam
in a
jury trial in Huntsville, Alabam
in Huntsville, Alabama.
After a two and a half month
trial, the
jury returned a verdict
in favor of Computers Plus and awarded it damages for the full value of its
business.
In particular, Mr. Webster has first - chaired several
trials and obtained a number of significant
jury verdicts for his
business clients.
He helps clients across the construction industry resolve a wide variety of complex
business and legal challenges through planning, contract negotiation and drafting, dispute avoidance, claim management, arbitration and litigation from inception through
jury trial in state and federal courts across the country.
Our skilled, battle - tested
trial attorneys provide a strong voice for your goals before judge and
jury in practice areas of
business, real estate, probate and trust litigation,
in addition to courtroom strategies that resolve contested and high net worth divorce disputes.
An experienced
trial lawyer, he has pursued or defended numerous nine - and eight - figure cases, which includes obtaining a full defense
jury verdict following a multi-month
trial for an institutional client facing $ 100 million
in contract and
business tort claims.
She has significant experience
in other areas including various high profile and confidential
business disputes, contract review, labor and employment law, constitutional law and imminent domain; duties include managing clients and full time
trial case load, state and federal
jury trial and bench
trial practice.
For 25 years, Mr. Mavrick has successfully represented clients
in business litigation and has substantial
trial and arbitration experience, obtaining favorable
jury trial, bench
trial, and arbitration verdicts.
Commercial Litigation — Lead attorney
in international fraud and breach of contract action resolved
in client's favor on summary judgment including recovery of all attorneys» fees; Served as first - chair defending a loan servicer
in complex civil litigation involving declaratory judgment action and cross-claims for commercial torts; Second chair for seven day
jury trial involving claims for indemnification and statutory
business conspiracy; Won summary judgment as the lead counsel on behalf of a charitable trust
in litigation over a commercial lease termination; Represented financial institutions
in commercial tort actions; Represented finance company
in AAA Arbitration.
Chip focuses his practice on
business litigation, and has tried
jury trials, court
trials and arbitrations, and argued appeals
in state and federal court.
Acted as lead
trial counsel
in a successful
jury trial in the
Business Litigation Session between shareholders of a close corporation involving claims of breach of fiduciary duty, shareholder status, and wrongful termination.
Brott v United States 858 F3d 425 (6th Cir 2017)(Amici Curiae National Federation of Independent
Business, Cato Institute and Southeastern Legal Foundation)(rejecting claim that property owners were entitled to
jury trial in an Article III court because Congress permitted to bestow exclusive subject matter jurisdiction over takings claims seeking more than $ 10,000
in the Court of Federal Claims)
In the area of business litigation, Mr. del Russo has represented clients in a wide range of business disputes in bench trials, jury trials, and arbitrations proceeding
In the area of
business litigation, Mr. del Russo has represented clients
in a wide range of business disputes in bench trials, jury trials, and arbitrations proceeding
in a wide range of
business disputes
in bench trials, jury trials, and arbitrations proceeding
in bench
trials,
jury trials, and arbitrations proceedings.
In their brief, the amici, National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, the Southeastern Legal Foundation, and the Cato Institute, contend that the Seventh Amendment Guarantee of a jury trial applies in lawsuits against the United States seeking vindication of a citizen's constitutional right
In their brief, the amici, National Federation of Independent
Business Small
Business Legal Center, the Southeastern Legal Foundation, and the Cato Institute, contend that the Seventh Amendment Guarantee of a
jury trial applies
in lawsuits against the United States seeking vindication of a citizen's constitutional right
in lawsuits against the United States seeking vindication of a citizen's constitutional rights.
Represents individuals, including public officials, lobbyists, and high - level state administrators, as well as
businesses,
in state and federal criminal investigations and grand
jury proceedings; clients accused by the government of fraud; students accused of sexual misconduct; Fellow of the American College of
Trial Lawyers; Best Lawyers
in America «Lawyer of the Year»
in Non-White-Collar Criminal Defense; listed
in Best Lawyers
in White - Collar Criminal Defense and Civil Rights Law categories.
Since 1959, we have been representing
business and individual clients
in contract and settlement negotiations,
jury and bench
trials.
With years of
trial experience, the Firm's lawyers are able to simplify and effectively convey the nuances of complex
business disputes to state and federal court judges and
juries, arbitration panels, administrative hearing officers, and
in various appellate forums throughout the country.
Successfully defended
in a
jury trial a Connecticut law firm on malpractice damage claims relating to the sale of a
business
And be it further enacted, That all the said courts of the United States shall have power to grant new
trials,
in cases where there has been a
trial by
jury for reasons for which new
trials have usually been granted
in the courts of law; and shall have power to impose and administer all necessary oaths or affirmations, and to punish by fine or imprisonment, at the discretion of said courts, all contempts of authority
in any cause or hearing before the same; and to make and establish all necessary rules for the orderly conducting
business in the said courts, provided such rules are not repugnant to the laws of the United States.
Maintained public relations with clients, attorneys, and judges, prepared for and attended civil, criminal, and
jury trials, took minutes of hearings, participated
in all aspects of District Court
business.