Sentences with phrase «but liberal minded»

His stand upon sodomizers getting married has been diluted by his narrowminded stance that the gay and lesbian crowds are nothing but liberal minded sodomizers that are doing nothing wrong!

Not exact matches

But with this year's plan, they've set themselves on such a modest, middling, excite - nobody path that it would look ungainly and erratic (mind you, consistency was no concern of the Ontario Liberals, who last year forecast a healthy string of surpluses).

For not only had he convened a symposium on hilarity, but within that gathering he had a struck a sub-committee dedicated to digging up things Liberal MPs had said that might be read aloud for the purposes of asserting a contradiction or change - of - mind on the part of the Liberal party.

It may boggle the mind to think why the Liberal and Alberta parties refuse to merge, but the two parties are still opponents.

The initial replies and post are mind boggling but really showcase how warped and intolerant the liberal mind actually is.

This habit is shared, not only by revolutionaries, but also by constitutionally - minded socialists, and even by many who would describe themselves as liberals, and who locate the instrument of social transformation not in violent confrontation, but in law.

But Mr. Hayward you use her article as a jumping off point for your own projections on how «religious» people see you SBNR types — liberal, educated, open minded, etc. which doesn't even come from her but from the Shambala SBut Mr. Hayward you use her article as a jumping off point for your own projections on how «religious» people see you SBNR types — liberal, educated, open minded, etc. which doesn't even come from her but from the Shambala Sbut from the Shambala Sun!

I don't mind gays, that's their choice between them and God, but one thing I'm sure of: the more and more «Liberal» this world gets, everyone and every group is going to want apiece of God and history'til eventually someone is going to «Liberate» us FROM God (Already having some try) and when that happens....

These essays make no concession to «the modern mind,» but being intelligent and literate they present liberal Jews with a bracing challenge» and Christians with a window on how classical Jewish thought is applied to contemporary problems.

But the charge puts me in mind of the colloquium discussion in the January issue of First Things which treated the debate between so - called «liberal» and «radical» Catholics, perhaps because my contribution to that discussion has elicited similar accusations of political irresponsibility or moral cowardice from people sympathetic to the liberal line of thought.

Thus fundamentalists are not only at odds with the more liberal sections of their own religious or ethnic community but they disagree also with fundamentalists of other persuasions, although they share a similar mind set.

But the ordinary person had to keep fixed in mind that the Syllabus lists liberal theses rather than Catholic doctrines, and then had to go in search of just the right negation.

Mind you, it may cost them customers, and it may even cost them their company, but people have to stand up for what they believe regardless of what liberals want everyone to smile and swallow.

The author's need to attach Christianity to a mass murder is strange... but he's stuck like all other liberal minded.

His College: The Undergraduate Experience in America (Harper & Row, 328 pp., $ 19.95), a report sponsored by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, describes the dusky condition of liberal education in recent years, but he writes with the hope of a sunrise in mind.

But by the late 20th century modern - minded liberals would find James more palatable than Niebuhr.

Our nation (Canada) has long prided itself on it's open - minded («liberal») tolerance (to everything but «sin, righteousness and judgement»), and self - sacrificing (socialism) morality.

I don't know about your country, but in mine, that particular word — «socialism» — was transformed long ago into just an ordinary truncheon used by certain cynical, parvenu bureaucrats to bludgeon their liberal - minded fellow citizens from morning until night, labeling them «enemies of socialism» and «antisocialist forces.

Yeah, right... he «unintentionally hurt» people... he accidentally said parents should hit their kids if they THINK they might be gay... sure, it was a typo... he couldn't actually have MEANT it... and it was secular liberal media's fault... because all real «fair - minded» people know what he meant... and that he didn't mean it... and someone else was to blame if he did... not that he did... but still he was the REAL victim...

I'm liberal an open minded but not THAT liberal and open minded.

Liberals are not open - minded, but filled with hate.

The irony of it all is that the «intelletual,» «open - minded,» «tolerant,» and «liberal» left appears to be anything but.

But the meaning of the parable is, in fact, not difficult to grasp, once we banish from our minds the varied interpretations known to us, from early Christian allegorizing to the «parables of growth» interpretation of liberal theology.

In fact, events such as the recent world youth gathering in Paris are organised by the local church, but more interesting is the reassurance that properly liberal Tablet types would not be caught dead attending, never mind helping to organise, such gatherings of the great unwashed.

But that very conservative Baptist decided DTS was too legalistic, fundamentalist and narrow - minded, and chose a more liberal seminary.

But even in Protestantism they have been abundant enough; and in its recent «liberal» developments of Unitarianism and latitudinarianism generally, minds of this order have played and still are playing leading and constructive parts.

Amsterdam is a very liberal city, we discovered, but we had other spices on our minds.

We have the Guardian, which is more liberal and open minded, but likes to knock Arsenal.

But as a liberal, I wouldn't mind if we taxed billionaires at 0 %.

I am secular and liberal, but I do not mind (too much) when parties tie their political convictions to the tenants of their faith.

With an individual's blog it is possible that you can discern what the agenda is - Paul Staines» agenda is, I think, avowedly «anti-establishment» (at least in his own mind) and libertarian to a degree that is almost anarchistic - he will probably not agree in totality... With the blogs that have numerous contributors, the agenda may be less clear - Liberal Conspiracy for example is less easy to categorise - yes it is left leaning, but the inconsistency in positions can be quite provoking and interesting.

It also kept an open mind about experiments in a liberal approach to cannabis in Washington, Colorado and Uruguay, where it says it is «too early to know how they will play out but we will monitor the impacts of these new policies in the years to come».

But an unanticipated situation had arisen whereby evil - minded forces threaten the values and the very existence of the nation, exploiting the liberal values to destroy the very same society.

Liberal Democrats weren't happy, liberally minded Tories were deeply uncomfortable too, but May wowed — and wooed — the conference hall with her promise to clamp down on extremism.

If they signalled they wouldn't do so, two immediate points of interest come to mind: 1) If Labour were the largest party, or even in a whole UK majority, but the Tories were the largest rump UK party, the Liberal Democrats could more easily claim a renewed coalition with the Conservatives was preferable to a centre - left alliance, since a government that would lose its majority within a year would be unable to govern effectively; 2) A Labour or Labour - led government following a «yes» vote would have an incentive to push back the date of independence as far as possible.

Joiners, who say they would vote Tory tomorrow despite not having done so last time (two thirds of them having come from the Liberal Democrats), think similarly but are more likely to prefer coalition government and to say they may change their mind again before the election.

However it isn't difficult to imagine a situation in which both Labour and the Conservatives could gain a majority in coalition with the Liberal Democrats help, but the Conservatives — under pressure from the backbenches — have erected a greater number of «red lines» while Labour are more open minded.

This is driven, of course, by the overwhelming support of young voters, but also by white Catholics, who have grown more open - minded on gay rights as they have become more affluent and educated, and as their children return from college with more liberal attitudes.

«This governor has fancied himself as a sort of fiscal hawk but willing to deal with other issues from a more moderate or liberal perspective,» said Blair Horner, the executive director of New York Public Interest Research Group, citing Mr. Cuomo's conservative - minded moves, like the property tax cap, and his more progressive policies, like same - sex marriage.

The parties have not yet fully set out their stalls, but it remains an important issue in the minds of many voters who remember the Liberal Democrats» U-turn on fees only too well.

But also challenging Cuomo for liberal hearts and minds in the general election is Howie Hawkins, the Green Party candidate.

But last month, several weeks into her campaign for mayor in one of the world's most liberal cities, she changed her mind.

Not just as a spouse who knows him intimately, but as a deft political mind in her own right: a feminist activist who understands grass - roots organizing, a liberal champion of the working class and an experienced author who has written speeches for leading New York officials.

«Conservatives don't seem to be any happier than liberals,» concludes Dan Kahan, a psychologist at Yale University who was not involved in the study but has waded through battles about the minds of liberals versus conservatives himself.

I am extremely liberal and 100 % for racial equality, but it's hard to argue with people who will just never change their minds.

Liberal and open minded but grounded too.

Others may be more liberal minded when it comes to particular faith, but they still want to marry someone they feel comfortable with; another Jewish person.

But director / writer Richard Brooks has a little more on his mind than simply a horse race and those liberal causes are what the piece is really about.

Don't get me wrong — I don't mind liberal adaptations of literature — but they need to be good liberal adaptations, if not at least coherent and consistent.

I am as liberal or open - minded as they come, but the truth is these BS approaches are not working nor addressing the real issues!!!!