Sentences with phrase «buy and hold strategy if»

I am looking at fix and flips mainly and will consider a buy and hold strategy if the numbers seem fitting.

These bonds might be considered for part of an individual investor's buy and hold strategy if they hold bonds for maturities of 20 years and longer.

Not exact matches

Investors must throw out a few ingrained ideas, like buy and hold and de-risking in old age, and adopt some new strategies if they want to live comfortably into their 90s.

Buying and holding the overall market — using an E.T.F. like the SPY, or a traditional index mutual fund, or a very diversified portfolio of stocks — has been an extremely profitable strategy if you stuck to it for the last 25 years.

Also, if a mutual fund is constantly buying and selling shares, the investor will face a lot of short - term capital gains, which will hurt them on their taxes.As investors, we want to stick to buy and hold strategies... so we would hope our mutual funds do the same.

If, however, you want to become one of those long - term investors that executes a buy - and - hold strategy that ends up becoming richer even through the passage of recessions and depressions, then I encourage you to focus on business performance.

If you are a committed, disciplined buy - and - hold investor with no sensitivity to cyclical market fluctuations (even those as large as the 50 % losses of 2000 - 2002 and 2007 - 2009), and you fully recognize the depth of cyclical risks that regularly accompanies that strategy, I don't encourage a deviation from that discipline based on my analysis of market risk.

If you follow a carefully considered buy - and - hold strategy, and you don't believe that market returns can be anticipated regardless of valuations, market action, or other considerations, then by all means stick to your discipline.

So it became industry practice to ignore Shiller's research findings, to act as if it was no big deal that valuations affect long - term returns and to continue to push the now discredited Buy - and - Hold strategy.

If stock price changes are caused by economic realities, the market is efficient and Buy - and - Hold is the ideal strategy (and the safe withdrawal rate is always the same number).

Gaining a much higher lifetime return permits you to do all sorts of exciting things with your life that you would not be able to do if you followed a Buy - and - Hold strategy (like retiring early!).

Though I certainly wouldn't advise it as a strategy, investors would have historically outperformed the S&P 500 with much less risk than a buy - and - hold simply by selling stocks when the S&P reached 19 times earnings and staying in T - bills until the P / E reverted to 15, even if it took years to do so.

Specifically if the kind of stocks that you use with this strategy are different from the kind of stocks that you own in the buy and hold forever portfolios?

ETFs are definitely worth considering over normal funds given their cost structure — the only question that we are currently discussing is if «buy and hold» strategies will stay the right investment strategies at all given further increased volatility in the markets.

From my understanding, it is conventional wisdom that if a person wishes to invest in the stock market but does not have the time or aptitude to evaluate individual stocks and time the market, he should invest only in no - load, low - fee mutual index funds, using a dollar - cost averaging strategy in a buy - and - hold fashion.

An alternative strategy to covered calls is a buy and hold strategy where you own the stock and hope for price appreciation (and collect dividends, if your stock pays dividends).

If you have Warren Buffett like skill, can find good growing companies trading at a large discount before everybody else does, and a history of 20 % + yearly returns, I advise you to stick with Buffett's contemporary buy - and - hold - forever strategy.

If your client is looking to grow her wealth over the long - term and is not concerned with generating immediate income, funds that focus on growth stocks and use a buy - and - hold strategy are best because they generally incur lower expenses and have a lower tax impact than other types of funds.

But he can't really use numbers indicating the return he will get at the end of 30 years of buy - and - hold investing because it is not reasonable to presume that he will follow a buy - and - hold strategy if he suffers big losses in portfolio value within the first 10 years.

But as a strategy and if executed well, yes momentum investing has shown it can yield solid results and occasionally, outperform a buy and hold approach.

Buy and hold — the strategy based on a theory that if you hold a stock long enough it will go up in price — refer to the above.

If what Roth is recommending is a passive asset - allocation strategy, then I would suggest that a buy, hold and hope strategy is not very appealing.

If Shiller is right, Buy - and - Hold is the most dangerous strategy ever concocted by the human mind.

Optionsforstocks: Now, if I can pick and choose a specific time period, I can show you any number of strategies that in hindsight would have done better than buy - and - hold.

* This also means that if you use $ SPY (no leverage), this model would underperform a simple buy - and - hold strategy.

If all Wall Street cared about were the fees it earns, it would not want investors following Buy - and - Hold strategies.

Bottom line: if you don't buy an index, you'll want to focus on strategies that have unique holdings and high active share.

If you buy the wrong company at any price, then the buy - and - hold strategy is a dumb move.

I'll start out by saying that I am a buy and hold investor of dividend paying stocks, now let's put that aside and look at the recent events and see if buy and hold investment still a good strategy.

But if your goal is the long - term growth of your portfolio, you need to apportion the majority of your resources to buy - and - hold and look at active trading as an entirely secondary strategy, if you even do it at all.

As a result, these types of investments are generally not designed for a buy - and - hold strategy, even if the «hold» period covers only several days.

If Velanki is looking for a buy - and - hold strategy with minimal trading, Clyne recommends low - volatility ETFs.

If they can buy and hold, these strategies will pay off over time, and far better than those that panic when things get bad.

Below are the results if we allocate 90 % of our portfolio to the buy - and - hold strategy and 10 % to the leveraged rotation strategy.

But if you stay in the markets in a buy - and - hold strategy, and the markets drop, your investments will likely drop as well.

With buy and hold strategies the general thought is that it's okay to hold onto positions that are temporarily overvalued — a la Phil Fisher — because even if the stock price retreats a little you still do well over the long term.

What if we combine this strategy with a buy and hold strategy?

The buy - and - hold strategy is a good one if you don't mind being a landlord.

It would be interesting to see if, over time, such simple timing when applied to double exposure ETF's beats a buy - and - hold strategy.

If stock prices really do play out in the pattern of a random walk, Buy - and - Hold is the ideal investing strategy.

If a bull market develops, active value investing should do at least as well as buy - and - hold strategies or passive indexing.

If the basis of your investment strategy is to diversify, buy, and hold, why would you allocate so much wealth to one country when over the long run that country may not perform as well as the world economy as a whole?

If you're looking for even more detail on these financing options and want to learn about examples of deals being done with these strategies, check out our Financing Avenues for Buy and Hold Investors course in our Pro Community for more guidance and tips.

If stocks crash yes again, I think we all will feel comfortable saying that Buy - and - Hold is a loser strategy and that Valuation - Informed Indexing is a winner strategy.

It's not as if The Stock - Selling Industry was handed $ 12 trillion in cash that it could use to finance television commercials touting the benefits of Buy - and - Hold strategies.

This simple trading strategy outperforms a 60/40 portfolio, regardless if the latter is rebalanced on a monthly basis, a five - year basis, or not at all (a pure buy - and - hold strategy).

A strategy for investing in which investors buy a bond and hold the bond until the date of maturity when the investor receives principal back and interest, if any.

I've been surprised at how controversial this idea is, but if most people are buying and holding, they are emotionally invested in this strategy.

We know about an investing strategy that beats Buy - and - Hold in 102 out of 110 time - periods, an investing strategy that permits us to obtain far higher returns at dramatically less risk, an investing strategy that permits us all to retire years sooner and that would bring us out of this economic crisis if we could share it with millions of middle - class investors (if people could switch to an investment strategy that would put their retirement plans back on track, they would feel free to start spending again and businesses could start hiring again), and our first reaction is to come up with convoluted arguments as to why the best thing to do is to AVOID learning more about it and to AVOID getting the word out to the millions of middle - class people whose lives we have destroyed with our promotion of Buy - and - Hold.

If you understand how to trade ETFs and can manage a long - term buy - and - hold investment strategy using ETFs in a discount brokerage account, then you have a few low cost international bond ETF choices.