For example, if you pay $ 100 to
buy enough points to cover your stay at a $ 400 hotel, then you got a good deal.
If you're looking to buy points to buy an award outright you need to compare the cost to
buy enough points for an award night vs the cash cost of the same room on the same date.
The easiest way to look a this is to see how much it would cost to
buy enough points for an award night at a hotel you're likely to want to stay at.
So, if you were to
buy enough points for a full award, this is how much you'd end up paying for each category of hotel:
so, if you wanted to
buy enough points for an award night at a Category 7 property... like the Park Hyatt New York....
The easiest way to look a this is to see how much it would cost to
buy enough points for an award night at, for example, one of the top Hyatt properties around the world.
So, if you wanted to
buy enough points for an award night at a top Hyatt property (Category 7) like the Park Hyatt Sydney....
The very top Hyatt Properties cost 30,000 points / night so, if you were to
buy enough points in this promotion to book such a property, that would set you back approximately $ 528 (I'm assuming you have the 300 points needed to top up the award already in your account.
The very top Hyatt Properties cost 30,000 points / night so, if you were to
buy enough points in this promotion to book such a property (at the best available rate), that would set you back approximately $ 513.
Top - tier Hyatt Properties cost 30,000 points / night so, if you were to
buy enough points in this promotion to book such a property, the award night would end up costing you approximately $ 554.
Yes, that may be a lot cheaper than the going cash rate but you can only
buy enough points for one night at those properties so how are you going to pay for any other nights?
If you want to
buy enough points to buy (just about) a night at a top Hyatt property it will set you back $ 552....
The key to maximizing the sale is to
buy enough points to get the highest bonus possible.
If you only have enough points for 3 nights then it would almost certainly be worth
buying enough points for a 4th night just to get a fifth night for free.
If you only have enough points for 3 nights then it would almost certainly be worth
buying enough points for a 4th night just to get a fifth night for nothing.
Not exact matches
You keep looking at sponsorship and I think it gets the
point where we're almost anyone if they saved up, and this was their goal, they could ultimately save
enough money to
buy a ticket and move to Mars.
After collecting
enough points employees can use them in an integrated online store to
buy things — everything from e-gift cards, electronics, fashion, health and beauty and more.
Many trace the tipping
point for utility - scale solar to a 2014 announcement by Austin Energy that it would
buy power from a new 150 megawatt solar plant —
enough to light and cool 30,000 homes - for 5 cents a kilowatt hour.
As I
pointed out, if the futures price falls by
enough relative to the spot price it will lead to a situation where there is an essentially risk - free arbitrage profit to be made by selling the physical and
buying the futures.
People still bear a burden of contempt from leaders and systems that reduce them to jobs to be done, votes to be cast, products to be
bought or — let us be honest
enough to add — data
points on a rising line of worship attendance.
If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this
point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have
enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket -
buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again
Sorry Mick I've watched Reid, he's average at best, he's no Cahill and he's not good
enough to help us challenge for the Pl and remember Chelsea
bought Cahill, the are not interested in Reid so that where your
point falls, he's typical wenger someone who he can sit behind Mert as 3 rd choice Is this what Arsenal have become a team happy with average players, wenger is very good at starving the fans so much the will settle for anyone
Sanchez has been great for us and you can see the team is improving every game, as i said when Sanchez and welbeck was
bought we have
enough firepower to challenge anyone its in our middle where we are soft, wenger has found a temporary solution and it has earned us some
points.
Wenger is so stubborn he will probably NOT
buy anyone whether we drop
points or not because he believes his squad is good
enough.
its frustrating being a gunner every single period of the season including the transfer window... we want to b d best but our transfer situations begs to differ... how many tyms do we need to shout spend, spend, spend b4 dat happens???? wat is d
point of being in d «top 10 financially rich clubs» list every year but don't spend like 1????? sure, we'll
buy d odd 30m player but is it
enough... dat stingy prof will always look for «value» for money spent but he has dat worked out for d past 12 years walcott - waste tbh chamberlain - waste chambers - so far, waste spending 15m five times is 75m which could have been used to
buy 2 top 30m signings....
In the last post you
pointed out Wenger has
bought in the past years
enough.
and wenger is being a t ## t now you can not start the transfer window with sanchez and end it with a f» ing wellbeck i will be dissapointed if we get that desperate only big name striker now would be cavani but no
point even saying it, we all know he thinks he has brought
enough typical frustations for us gooners why can we challenge the big teams for the big players suarez to barca, I would of been happyt with balo liverpool, costa chelsea, if they do falcao united wich is a complete joke if he is happy going to united he would have been happier coming here with ucl and all, lewandowski bayern, its all a joke we better get a reus or something of equal measure you cant
buy sanchez and place him as a striker when you need him as a winger if defeats the purpose we either get another winger or a striker.
I've had
enough of this crap, look I honesty do think giroud is a good striker and he is a fairly consistant goal scorer, and every time he played for arsenal he gave 100 percent and I think we all appreciated the way he was, a true professional, but to say we as fans were too critical of him or that he didn't have
enough of a chance at arsenal is just absolute bullshit, first of all he has scored more headed goals than any other player in the prem since he arrived in 2012 so we did play to his strengths and he was our main striker for four long years and every pundit on sky and motd has at one
point said Giroud is not
enough for arsenal to win the title ect, but, now we have sold him he is apparently the best thing since sliced bread and the best
buy of the transfer window blah blah fuc * # * g blah.
This doesn't need in - depth analysis Wenger is the problem, all the low quality players in our team were
bought by him, this is the manager who felt this squad that finished 12
points behind Chelsea last season was good
enough by only adding a goalkeeper Cech when we needed a DM and striker as well!
Agree with many
points in this article.Wenger is still one of the best managers in the World, no doubt about this but I think is
enough is
enough.His one of the managers who ressist a long time at the same club but I don't think he deserve to cache Ferguson.Is the oposite of Ferguson.Ferguson
buy world class players and keep them, sell them after some succes years at the club, Wenger discover players, grow them and sell before we have a complet class team.
«My guess is that the Patriots» 42 - 14 win over the Texans is still fresh
enough that bettors will continue to lay the
points with New England all week, but the big question is how high the sharp bettors will let the line get before
buying back Houston.»
No 4/5 ANDY SAYS: Close game here but I have to go for the home side to land the three
points... 2 - 1 GRAEME SAYS: I can see Burnley getting something here, maybe not the win but at a draw... 2 - 2 SILKY SAYS: Tough call, but Southampton should have
enough for the win... 2 - 1 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Virgil van Dijk still looks a very good
buy at just over # 1.50
An initial loan worth around $ 5 - 6m might be
enough to convince the French giants to concede an option to
buy instead of an obligation, as at that
point they could be fairly certain of Inter's intentions of signing Pastore permanently (officially Inter can not complete operations with obligations to
buy at the moment, because UEFA would not permit it given the Nerazzurri's current Financial Fair Play situation).
Jose Mourinho's declaration that # 300 million was «not
enough» to spend in the market in order to compete with a Manchester City side who «
buy full - backs for the price of strikers» placed transfer fees on the agenda this week, even before Liverpool's head - spinning outlay on Virgil van Dijk ensured it remained the talking
point.
I appreciate your reply but I am slightly crest fallen that my headline post isn't persuasive
enough to conclusively make the
point to you that Wenger is no longer able to
buy one quality player from the EPL let alone two of them as you would like.
It usually does take a significant amount of
points to purchase a new diaper but by continuing to
buy from the same retailer you'll accumulate
points and hopefully have
enough to
buy your unicorn print when it comes along.
When you get
enough Points you'll qualify to
buy these deals.
We switched to disposals at that
point and have yet to reach the amount it would have taken to
buy new cloth diapers —
enough so that they have time to dry the old fashioned way.
Up until this
point we were fortunate
enough to have loads of diapers given to us by friends and family memebers as gifts, plus my precious inlaws would
buy diapers everytime they went to a store that sold diapers.
As Marx
pointed out, this is what capitalism does: on the one hand, the system relies on consumers having
enough money to actually
buy things and keep an economy afloat.
At this
point, I really just
buy things that seem to fit «well
enough» and that I like, hoping all these random pieces will just eventually come together into a cohesive wardrobe.
I think once you reach a
point where you are old
enough to
buy your own things, that physical stuff shouldn't be given.
Do not let anyone tell you that replica watches are not good
enough to
buy, just show him or her the one you
bought and ask them to
point out the difference.
I usually
buy Slim fit but this modern fit is close
enough for my taste, I won't hesitate to
buy more modern fit shirts at the right price
point however, slim is still the better fit for my 5» 10» 165 lbs frame
Unfortunately, by ditching the high ground in favor of not - especially - convincing theatrics, the potency of the film becomes diluted to the
point where we're viewing the infiltration of these secret cell groups as a fantasy, and therefore don't
buy many of their tactics and plausible
enough to keep us on the same edge we'd be teetering on if we felt the authenticity through and through.
If
enough people
buy it maybe this price
point will appeal to more developers.
The great redeeming virtue of «Waiting for Forever» is that it's not effective
enough to make us
buy its
point of view.
In choosing Delaware and Tennessee as round - one winners, Secretary of Education Arne Duncan
pointed to considerable district and union
buy - in —
enough to mean each state's plan would reach 100 percent of the student population — as being instrumental.
«Well, then give me this,» he said,
pointing to the 1986 Alfa Romeo GTV6 that I was fortunate
enough to have been stupid
enough to have
bought earlier this year for $ 2500.
And even after that
point, we might be on a number of readers» auto -
buy lists, but is it
enough to succeed (however we define that)?