Sentences with phrase «buy it at this price because»

People will buy it at this price because it's unlocked.

Not exact matches

At the hearing, Dr. David Kimberlin, who specializes in pediatric infectious disease at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, spoke of a situation in September, around the time Daraprim's price went up after Turing bought the rights to the drug, in which he found barriers to getting the drug because the monthly cost for four tablets suddenly spiked to $ 3,000 from $ 5At the hearing, Dr. David Kimberlin, who specializes in pediatric infectious disease at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, spoke of a situation in September, around the time Daraprim's price went up after Turing bought the rights to the drug, in which he found barriers to getting the drug because the monthly cost for four tablets suddenly spiked to $ 3,000 from $ 5at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, spoke of a situation in September, around the time Daraprim's price went up after Turing bought the rights to the drug, in which he found barriers to getting the drug because the monthly cost for four tablets suddenly spiked to $ 3,000 from $ 5at Birmingham, spoke of a situation in September, around the time Daraprim's price went up after Turing bought the rights to the drug, in which he found barriers to getting the drug because the monthly cost for four tablets suddenly spiked to $ 3,000 from $ 54.

«Cosmetics boost the awareness of a brand, especially in emerging markets because they are the first thing of luxury [that] emerging market consumers buy due to their cheaper price,» said Nicola Ko, senior luxury analyst at Ledbury Research.

In part, that's because the rich have more discretion on when and where to buy homes — and with the costs of owning a home in New York going up with the tax plan, apartments aimed at the rich will see the biggest price hits.

Gorce's problem is lack of space; he can't buy too much cocoa at today's relatively low prices because he has nowhere to store it in his little shop.

Cash is good to have on hand because it serves as a buffer against losses and allows you to buy great companies at lower prices.

One of the big upsides of a DRIP is that this regular investment in a particular stock assures you'll be benefiting from dollar cost averaging, meaning that because you're regularly investing — quarterly, in most cases — and because stocks rise and fall, you'll avoid buying a stock at its highest price.

«The price of virtual currencies rises because of the expectation that the next person will buy it at the desired price and this is quite like a Ponzi scheme.»

Since then I bought more shares because even at a much higher price now, I still believe that the price of gold is on a new bull run.

When the markets move higher, your returns are going to look worse if you're making contributions throughout the year because you're continually buying at higher prices.

According to Living Goods, clients may also be reluctant to buy drugs from other private providers because of the risk of getting a counterfeit medicine.63 Living Goods sent us a study conducted at the midline of its RCT that claims that both availability of counterfeit drugs and drug prices decreased at private retailers in areas where CHPs worked.64 According to the study, about 37 % of private drug shops in the areas it studied sold fake ACT drugs, 65 and availabilty of fake ACTs was about 50 % lower among non-Living Goods sellers in the areas where Living Goods worked.66 Additional results on these potential effects will be made available when the full RCT is published.

Interestingly, just as in every other commodity market, the greatest defense for venture capitalists turns out to be brand: firms like Benchmark, Sequoia, or Andreessen Horowitz can buy into firms at superior prices because it matters to the startup to have them on their cap table.5 Moreover, Andreessen Horowitz in particular has been very open about their goal to offer startups far more than money, including dedicated recruiting teams, marketing teams, and probably most usefully an active business development team.

Meanwhile, another U.S. hot spot is the Permian Basin, where there has been a feeding frenzy over the past year to buy up as much acreage as possible because the drilling returns are so good at current crude prices.

Even if you have private information that I don't have, it's impossible to use it to make a profit because as soon as you try to buy, I infer that you must have information that the security is desirable at the current price.

This is because analysts see the dip in price as a buying opportunity for investors who missed buying cryptocurrencies at previous lows.

If you were an avid investor, you would have spent countless hours doing math for many stocks until you found the one that was trading at the right price (P / B and P / E) and if everything else looked good on the company, you would buy the stock because it was a steal.

If you bought futures for $ 95 a barrel but the price at delivery was $ 92, you'd lose $ 3 per barrel because you would essentially overpay by that amount for every barrel.

However, yesterday's price action in EEM now makes our reward to risk ratio even more favorable for buy entry because the ETF gapped lower on the open, then reversed to close at its intraday high.

Buffett expressed frustration in the shareholder letter about how difficult it is to find something to buy at a «sensible» price, because the markets have surged in the past year.

Back in 1999, Buffett said the reason why he avoided buying red - hot technology stocks was because it is too difficult to identify the handful of long - term winners and buy their stocks at reasonable prices.

«In the ruin of all collapsed booms is to be found the work of men who bought property at prices they knew perfectly well were fictitious, but who were willing to pay such prices simply because they knew that some still greater fool could be depended on to take the property off their hands and leave them with a profit.»

Because stocks never go up in a straight line and if the stock is a sound one, it's a great opportunity to buy more at lower price.

Although the value of my portfolio has dropped, the dividends I bring in still remain the same, and because i reinvest all my dividends I'm actually buying companies at a discount prices.

You should care because if you are investing consistently, every time market prices drop you get to buy your shares at a discount!

Instead, they would have bought because they like the idea of BitGold, oblivious to the fact that a good business can be a bad investment at the wrong price, or because they think that someone else will be dumb enough to pay an even higher price in the future.

Then if you think you're unlucky because the market sells off just after you bought, think again and reconsider whether or not you were unlucky or whether you just got your wish and are now able to scale in at lower rather than higher prices as you build your positions before the Gold Rocket Ship blasts - off.

Because they trade at such low prices, even a small amount of money can buy hundreds or thousands of shares.

I will be looking for some more opportunities in the current state of the market because I would love to buy some stocks at bargain prices.

While any announcement is likely to cause a dramatic response from the financial markets — all the more so because few markets seem to be pricing in the possibility of a change in tack at the moment — we don't foresee a quick end to the ECB's asset - buying program.

He found that just buying low price / book stocks does not produce excess returns over the long term, because many low price / book companies are trading at a discount because they deserve to — they're dogs with poor prospects.

A few false breakouts and shakeouts along the way washes out the weak hands, which creates demand at higher prices because those who sold are forced to buy back in or miss the next move higher.

This is because they will have to sell their expiring contracts near the spot price and buy new contracts at a price higher than the spot.

Still, the next bubbly stretch will be dangerous for acquirers and investors, and not just because they'll be buying at lofty prices.

Howard excellent article by bonhoeffer on grace, it isnt cheap we were bought at a price we were slaves and he bought us and Jesus paid for each of us in full and then gave us our freedom.It was given by him freely because we did nt have the means to pay him even if we worked a lifetime it still wouldnt be enough.To me it is a crime to accept his grace without giving him all of our hearts in return.That is the least we could do.brentnz

This new type is almost too fine and it gives a gritty textire to the baked goods I ordered it because the one I usually buy, the flaked, was not available at a good price on amazon.

«Most of them buy at least 75 percent of their products from us because we offer the best prices and quality.»

«We have to buy and negotiate with the manufacturers so you can be competitive, which is getting more and more difficult because so many of the manufacturers look at volume and offer the price according to the volume, and that has created problems for the smaller dealers,» he laments.

I am giving this product 5 stars because when I bought it 2 months ago I was able to buy it at a great price and I loved the product.

[The price of] commodity dairy ingredients namely skim milk powder and whole milk powder... is at historic lows and is looking like staying there for a while because of the change in buying patterns in China and the embargo in Russia.

I keep hesitating to buy one because I have it stuck in my head I should only get «the best» but at the price tag for what I am looking at, I just can't justify it right now.

«They protect the invoice price because if I get taken over by Woolworths, Woolworths looks at my accounts and goes back to Treasury and wants a 30 per cent discount for everything they have bought.

You know your customers would love to buy just about anything with your name on it because your name says it all — high - quality, great tasting products at an affordable price.

Wenger remains a pig headed old man — He feels he has to play Ozil because of the stupid buy he made at that ridiculous price.

but, im ok with this vardy transfer... it shows us many things: 1) wenger is changing, something some of us have been demanding for a long time; 2) it shows that wenger is taking risks: think about it, he is buying a men for a not cheap price, knowing he could not getting anything after, with a future sell i mean... this is an act that shows wengers intentions to win something, the buy is not motivated by any financial or economic reason but only for a «get the f epl once again» reason... this is an act that shows us hungry, even if we fail, we could said we try... first ever, we really try; 3) finally but very important... vardy is the kind of player we need... he is a warrior, a fighter... he has character... look at how he celebrate his goals... full of energy... he, like alexis, can motivate the team when the things are not going in our way (something wenger cant do because of his age and because he has never been an active coach on the pitch)... the vardy transfer, if it finish well, is a demostration of a change, and a good one... lets take care of winning things and do nt look the economic side for once... vardy is a bit old, but we can give a chance to welbeck after maybe, or akpom... u are not thinking about the future when we talk about ibra... guys: u complain when wenger do nt spend or because he is always looking for the bargain when u are the guys who has to pay the very expensive tickets... u complain when wenger buy the always for the future guy... like morata... stop to complain for everything and be consequent with yourself... i would love auba, but it is not going to happen... lukaku is awesome but the asking price is stupid... lets try with vardy, give us the throphy..

We heard that those who spend big win trophy but what what Leicester City??!! As you said their entire team is not worth what Ozil widths!!!! This guy is at the end of the road in my opinion today he said ticket price is high because we spend TV REVENUE to buy players what a stinking liar!!!

Wenger himself doesn't want to spend all in the name of «I have not got the right quality in the market, the prices are way above their actual valuation» etc. but even if he does buy, it's difficult to believe anything could easily change at the moment because he doesn't have guts to point fingers at players who even make serial mistakes e.g. xhaka in three consecutive games, his three mistaken passes have resulted into three goals which I doubt a coach like maurinho can tolerate.

Directly because of his lies - and let us use that correct word, LIES, — fans bought into the new regime and life with increased prices at the new stadium, which was of course operative before Gazidis, but needed marketing (as the huge cost it indeed was), AND ALSO EXAGGERATED to get fans to accept long term mediocrity of new players.

It is not down to Arsenal just to buy a player... the selling club has to a) want to sell b) agree a price and c) ensure they have someone else to replace who they are selling Additionally because of FFP and Home - Grown rules it does nt make sense to buy all your players and then suddenly you could get 2 - 3 major injuries and have to buy someone else but then cant because you have no monies or might have to sell someone to be able to do so So many people saying negative things and that we should just go and buy and yet at the same time why spend so much on someone when we could have got somebody else!

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

my problem with AW is that for years he resisted to buy good players because of a million or two difference from asking price today's market those players are worth triple, we could of had a great team with possibly wining the EPL twice and possibly semis or final of CL, if he had just spent the money in the bank, Chelsea are in dept around 850 Million pounds (possible the bulk to Abromovich) and same for Man - United and few more, we are the only club that is cash rich with funds available around hidden 350 million and more accumulating every season, how i know this because i look at their end of year accounts outgoings and income there is around 100 to 120 million less outgoings then income, we can easily spend 700 Million in the summer and we will be well in with FFP rules and only have 350m to pay in two years which we can with bigger and higher sponsorship coming any day now