Thus, we have to
buy more coal every year per kilowatt - hour generated.â $
Not exact matches
Here's what that could entail: calling off talks to
buy more B.C. hydro supply to offset the shuttering of Alberta's
coal plants.
In complying with restrictions on use of
coal, California
buys more natural gas.
In the Maryland suburbs of Washington DC, I
buy 100 % wind - generated electricity through PEPCO Energy Services, and it is only slightly
more expensive than PEPCO's «standard service» which is about 57 %
coal, 35 % nuclear, 5 % natural gas, and 1 % oil.
Now what we can do is 1) develop a sustainable energy economy 2) a) burn all the
coal and other fossil fuels,
buying us, if we make optimistic assumptions, perhaps a century of ever
more elaborate schemes to meet energy needs with less and less suitable sources b) THEN in a severely degraded environment
People do not
buy your dirty
coal power's today will come, at that time, you will loss
more money.
Buying up US
coal just helps the other countries at the top, China, Russia, India and Australia to export
more.
The owners get a lump sum to go away and
buy something
more profitable than
coal, and the governments get an investment that pays for itself.
On the 4 Corners programme the other night, John Howard said that Australia would be silly to impose a domestic carbon tax as that would just allow China to
buy our
coal more cheaply.
From a purely pragmatic perspective, one could argue that the Republicans are simply looking out for taxpayer interests until you realize that their «don't
buy it if it's
more expensive» directive doesn't apply to synthetic fuels derived from
coal and natural gas.
In
buying Chinese goods, you are encouraging them to burn
more coal.
I say this based on my experience as the former head of the TVA, which
bought and burned
more than 30 million tons of
coal a year.
Electricity is
bought and sold in a «free» market, as far as any are in fact totally «free» — the price of electricity is linked to that of gas and oil and
coal and carbon, and it is also driven by supply and demand — it gets dearer in the cold weather when we use
more (generally speaking).
The refundable tax credits were intended to make Virginia
coal cheaper for utilities to
buy, and thus
more competitive with
coal mined in other states.
The utility had a long - term power purchase agreement from 1988 with the Cedar Bay
coal plant in Jacksonville, but now has
bought the plant to shut it down, which it says will save its customers
more than $ 70 million, as well as preventing nearly 1 million tons of carbon emissions annually.
It doesn't make a difference that a
coal - burning powerplant has to reduce its emissions if they have to do it by reducing their own
coal, that could be
more costly than just
buying an offset and we still get the same environmental result.
It will force Oregon ratepayers to pay
more for alternative sources rather than
buy cheap, fully amortized
coal power that's going to be used anyway.
With a scrubber in place, a plant using high - sulfur
coal can reduce its need to
buy and surrender SO2 emissions permits by 90 % or
more compared to a plant using the same fuel without a scrubber, making Illinois Basin
coal much
more competitive, especially against Central Appalachia which previously could rely on its low sulfur content as a competitive advantage.
Arch
Coal had a sizable debt payment due in December, but opted to defer payment to mid-January in a desperate attempt to
buy itself
more time with debt - holders.
Buying new nuclear power instead of implementing efficiency measures, Lovins says, results in «more carbon release than if the same money were spent buying a new coal - fired power plant.&
Buying new nuclear power instead of implementing efficiency measures, Lovins says, results in «
more carbon release than if the same money were spent
buying a new coal - fired power plant.&
buying a new
coal - fired power plant.»
We know a grid can
buy coal at 5 cents per kWhr and nat gas for a little
more, maybe 8 cents per kWhr.
But the nation's new law, which will mandate utility companies to
buy all available renewable power — even if it's
more expensive than
coal — should be a clear sign that the US is falling even further behind in the clean energy race.
Having access to a western regional energy market is going to make it much easier for California to
buy and build
more renewables and help drive dirty
coal off the market.
It's very cost - effective compared to
buying primte - time commercials saying «use
more oil and
coal».
Progress Energy Florida lost a similar case before the PSC in 2007, when the commission ordered the company to refund $ 13.8 million for
buying more expensive
coal from 2003 to 2005.