Sentences with phrase «buy subsequent books»

the norm for a new author, especially one with a series (like O'Connell's) is I'll try it at $ 0.99 or $ 1.99 for the first book of the series and if I like it, buy subsequent books in the series for a higher price.

Contrary to some of what was described at top, if readers enjoy the first book in a series, they DO very often go ahead and buy the subsequent books.

Over time, the numbers tell you how many people go on to buy subsequent books after trying the first, so you've got a good idea how many buyers you're going to have each month if you can get X number of new people to pick up the first book.

With the «no royalty» option limited to your first book and demand for subsequent books you've written increasing, libraries are more likely to buy subsequent books through the only channel you've made available for those books — the one that pays you a royalty.

Not exact matches

Once readers sample your work, they are more likely to buy more of what you write or ask libraries to carry your subsequent books because they'll know what they're getting.

Once you've managed to turn a prospect into a loyal fan, the chances of them buying your previous and subsequent book releases rise exponentially and the conversion process becomes that much easier.

As to the quality of the work, that would be up to the purchaser who buys a particular book and the subsequent review they leave.

The book and subsequent articles point out precisely the opposite: when you bought the house in the first place you did leverage, because you had no equity to balance the loan; your lender had the strangle hold on your ownership of the property.

Can you please explain what Prof said about buying at a lower book value and then subsequent investments made at back value through retention of earnings.