Sentences with phrase «buyer sued»

In Arizona, a buyer sued the listing broker when, shortly after buying a house, he learned there was heavy mold infestation that would cost $ 60,000 to remediate.

The Buyer sued the Sellers and Smith Bell for fraud, negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract, and Smith Bell for violation of the Vermont Consumer Fraud Act (the «VCFA»).

Buyer sued Broker for fraud, negligence, and breach of contract.

The buyer sued Meybohm and the listing broker, claiming they had misrepresented the condition of the house and concealed evidence of the gas leak.

Buyer sued CB Listing Salesperson pleading the CB Listing Salesperson, and Coldwell Banker — as broker («Broker CB»), breached their fiduciary duty and failed to advise Buyer to hire a third party to verify the actual square footage.

The buyer sued the appraiser for negligence, saying that an addition should have been treated as a separate area, rather than as a bedroom.

Following the purchase, the buyer sued the Sellers and the Brokerage, alleging misrepresentations, negligence, and unjust enrichment.

The buyer sued the original appraiser for intentional and negligent misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment.

Still, the buyer sued on the basis that the seller had failed to disclose that the property was haunted.

The buyer sued seeking performance of the contract.

In the cases discussed below, the buyer sued the real estate professional for failure to disclose a property condition, even though that condition was disclosed in an inspection report or a disclosure form.

A buyer sued an inspector and real estate brokers, arguing that they failed to disclose structural defects and toxic mold.

The buyer sued when he later found out.

The buyer sued the listing licensee and broker for breach of fiduciary duty.

The buyer sued the seller in Small Claims Court, and the trial judge awarded $ 25,000 for the misrepresentation.

The buyers sued the sellers and the licensees involved in the sale.

The buyers sued the sellers and the sellers» broker and salesperson, charging professional negligence and negligent and intentional misrepresentation.

The buyers sued for the return of their $ 17,750 deposit, arguing that the sellers weren't harmed by the buyers backing out of the deal.

The buyers sued the sellers and the listing agent last year, and the court's decision was released in August.

The buyers sued the sellers for not disclosing this.

The buyers sued the seller's representative, claiming negligence, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud.

However, after the closing, the buyers sued the sellers and Elkowitz, alleging that the salesperson knew about the defects from the earlier litigation and was aware the amount of the settlement was insufficient to make all the repairs.

The sellers sued for damages; the buyers sued for the return of their $ 10,000 deposit.

The buyers sued their agent (among others), alleging she had breached her fiduciary duty by recommending a pest control company that allegedly failed to perform its work in a satisfactory manner.

Should a buyer sue a seller for damages post possession relating to an oversight by the seller's paid - for inspector, the judge will no doubt note that the buyer did not carry out his / her own due diligence by commissioning his / her own inspection report, thus naively avoiding hiring an inspector to work for his / her financial interests.

The buyers sued the sellers and the two sales associates, a team acting as disclosed dual agents, claiming they had knowingly violated the federal Residential Lead - Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992.

I've seen more legitimate deals blow up and buyers sued that include damages for the costs of what sellers customarily do after they are under contract and the buyers lose.

The buyers sued seeking specific performance of the contract as well as damages.

The buyers sued the sellers and the real estate licensees who represented them, alleging fraud and breach of contract because the sellers had known about the possibility of a sewer assessment.

The buyers sued the listing broker and salesperson, the sellers, and their own broker and salesperson after discovering defects in their newly purchased house.

The buyers sued the sellers and all three salespeople, charging misrepresentation and fraud in connection with the failure to disclose the prior test results.

It sold, the roof leaked, the buyers sued, and the sellers paid.

Black and white comments like «In no circumstances can the buyer sue the bank for any reason» is a little riduculous.

Casey v. Masullo Brothers Builders, Inc. (218 A.D. 2d 907)- Buyer sues seller for fraud, misrepresentation, mistake of fact and breach of contract where buyer purchased residence based upon representations by seller through newspaper advertisements and representations by seller's Realtor regarding the school district within which the property was located; Realtor's statement based upon own investigation, loan profile sheet from an abstract company prepared prior to the closing, and town tax rolls which confirmed placement of the property within the disclosed school district; unless the facts are matters peculiarly within one party's knowledge, the other party must make use of means available to him to ascertain, by the exercise of ordinary intelligence, the truth of such representations; question of fact exists whether a reasonable inquiry would have revealed the correct school district; order dismissing seller's motion for summary judgment affirmed.

Striker v. Graham Pest Control & Veronica Lynch (179 A.D. 2d 984) buyer sues listing broker and inspection company regarding inspection prior to closing, which did not reveal infestation by carpenter ants.

The buyers sued the seller, the real estate agent and the broker.

Who can the buyer sue?

Not exact matches

InterDigital, a U.S. company that earns money by suing and securing licensing agreements for its patents, was unable to find a buyer last year.

The New York state attorney general's office is suing a pet store chain, saying it sold dozens or hundreds of puppies without required veterinary exams and failed to reimburse medical expenses to buyers of sick...

The New York state attorney general's office is suing a pet store chain, saying it sold dozens or hundreds of puppies without required veterinary exams and failed to reimburse medical expenses to buyers of sick puppies.

Is a book buyer going to sue Locke for the 99 cents they spent because of a fake review?

@corsiKa One of the main purposes of brokers and exchanges is to avoid the annoyance of random buyers and sellers winding up on the hook to each other and having to sue random people to get the money they're entitled to.

But other buyers lost their deposits and were sued, says Kahane, the Calgary lawyer.

Back in the days of «agent showing» feedback, I let the listing agent know what I had discovered and the cold cellar evidence, who promptly started calling me nasty names and told me to mind my own business and that I had been wrong to address the issue to my would - be buyer and that I could be sued for interfering with his listing likely having prevented a possible sale.

Frequently, consumers sued by debt buyers ignore the lawsuits, which results in a default judgment.

If you have been sued by a debt collector or a debt buyer, you should immediately contact an attorney.

When creditors and debt buyers are not able to work out payment plans, can not contact the person who owes money, or have seen no payments in quite some time, they are usually left with only one option, and that is to sue to get a judgment.

Midland Funding, LLC, one of the country's largest debt buyers, was sued yesterday by the Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson.

When a buyer can't get full financing, they risk losing their substantial deposit, or being sued by the seller for breach of contract.

Buyer's lawyer warned that at this point, buyer may have to pay for closing fees as well since most of that work has been done, and that they could be sued by the seBuyer's lawyer warned that at this point, buyer may have to pay for closing fees as well since most of that work has been done, and that they could be sued by the sebuyer may have to pay for closing fees as well since most of that work has been done, and that they could be sued by the seller.