Not exact matches
But politicians, especially from the Maritime provinces, were also of the view that their taxpayers had
bought and paid for the western timber, farmlands,
coal and later
oil and gas with the payout to the Hudson's Bay Co..
Yes, there are a few nooks
and crannies that are neglected, like Russia
and Brazil, industries that are deeply out of favor like gold,
oil E&P,
coal, mining, etc., but you have to hold your nose
and take reputational risk to
buy them.
In the Maryland suburbs of Washington DC, I
buy 100 % wind - generated electricity through PEPCO Energy Services,
and it is only slightly more expensive than PEPCO's «standard service» which is about 57 %
coal, 35 % nuclear, 5 % natural gas,
and 1 %
oil.
Folks on the Al Gore side, in other words, have the situation preposterously backwards: they first should shoot down what skeptics say with superior scientific reasoning
and analysis,
and then nail the coffin shut by proving precisely how skeptics put out fabricated material
bought by «big
coal &
oil».
So if the United States is
buying the dirtiest stuff, it also surely will be going after
oil in the deepest ocean, the Arctic,
and shale deposits;
and harvesting
coal via mountaintop removal
and long — wall mining.
«Big
oil, gas,
and coal have huge influence on politicians
and governments
and they get that influence the old fashioned way — they
buy it,» said Kretzmann.
In such a world, one must ask, who will
buy America's
oil, gas
and coal?
Even your private property rights are being attacked,
and taken away from you, as an example when you
buy real estate / property, it usually includes all mineral rights, but now if you have... gravel, Gold, water,
coal, minerals,
oil, or natural gas, on your property the government now says that it is not yours to use, harvest, or sell.
Then why is the tone of Sharon Begley's cover story — nine pages in which anyone skeptical of the claim that human activity is causing global warming is painted as a
bought -
and - paid - for lackey of the
coal and oil industries — so strident
and censorious?
Worse yet, they have virtually unlimited money from taxpayers
and from
oil and gas investments (In the case of Soros,
buying coal after Obama made the market drop)
and they still are not winning.
Electricity is
bought and sold in a «free» market, as far as any are in fact totally «free» — the price of electricity is linked to that of gas
and oil and coal and carbon,
and it is also driven by supply
and demand — it gets dearer in the cold weather when we use more (generally speaking).
Fortum has already signed an agreement to
buy a 47 % share of Uniper currently held by E.ON, a German utility that spun off its
coal,
oil, gas,
and nuclear assets to form Uniper in January 2016.
So if the United States is
buying the dirtiest stuff, it also surely will be going after
oil in the deepest ocean, the Arctic,
and shale deposits;
and harvesting
coal via mountaintop removal
and long - wall mining.
(06/07/2012) Governments, NGOs,
and others fighting climate change should consider
buying coal and oil deposits — not to exploit them, but to keep them from being exploited, according to a bold new policy paper in the Journal of Political Economy.
It's very cost - effective compared to
buying primte - time commercials saying «use more
oil and coal».