One has the sense that Barr thinks there is a philosophy somewhere that authorizes these judgments, but what it is and how, if at all, it can be critiqued in turn
by biblical truth he again does not say.
I think the visible Church is steadily crawling out on a limb that is not supported
by Biblical truth, and when it snaps the fall and fall out will be great.
Not exact matches
«While I applaud and agree with many of Glenn Beck's conservative and constitutional views, that does not give me or any other Bible - believing Christian justification to compromise
Biblical truth by spiritually joining Beck.»
You are either intentionally or ignorantly — both then and now, i.e., 13 years later — are depriving those patients whom whom God of love is putting in your path to use your divinity school knowledge and your
biblical faith experience to guide the path of that talk towards the absolute
truth related to the love of God — i.e. true love which stems from God
by giving his only Son for whoever to choose to believe on him to have «everlasting life»
by having his / her sins forgiven.
You hit the nail squarely on the head for indeed so,
biblical truths are «written on our heart»
by way of the Presence of Christ's Indwelt Spirit Who is ever faithful to «guide you into all
truth» and «show (us) things to come» (John 16:13) but the problem is (as is woefully evident with this Article \ s Author), too many people (believers) choose to eschew or disregard «sound doctrine» (2 Timothy 4:3) promulgating John 14:17 ignorance of the Doctrine of The Holy Spirit whose inevitable product is a darkened understanding (such as is evidenced
by the Article's Author --RRB-.
In fact,
by failing to do so, you become a culprit
by not probing their minds to make sure that whether they are aware of this
biblical truth and hence being perished and away from that everlasting love for eternity — and for this very reason and negligence or misguidance, you will be responsible and accountable when you meet with your creator God of love whom he also loved you so much that if you were the only person living on the face of this earth and planet, still he would have come and died for you and the forgiveness of your since and loving you unconditional.
Revisiting late medieval
biblical interpretation, we may consider the delicacy of the hermeneutic circle formed
by Scripture and tradition, appreciating the fragility of a synthesis that refuses to impose on ancient consensus a linear, hierarchical path to
truth.
Having shared the great grace of baptism and having been appropriately catechized into «the mysteries,» evangelical Catholics understand, appreciate, and live the
biblical truth of Christian vocation as given
by St. Paul: «Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord; and there are varieties of working, but it is the same God who inspires them all in every one.
What preachers once taught as
biblical truth — slavery is sanctioned
by God; women aren't allowed to preach; gambling and dancing are sin — is now rejected
by many churches.
That
biblical vision helped form the bedrock convictions of the American idea: that government stood under the judgment of divine and natural law; that government was limited in its reach into human affairs, especially the realm of conscience; that national greatness was measured
by fidelity to the moral
truths taught
by revelation and inscribed in the world
by a demanding yet merciful God; that only a virtuous people could be truly free.
And all of it, marked
by the courage to take on the tough questions with both generosity and a deep commitment to
biblical truth.
This addition helps to counter the impression left
by the earlier draft that reason is used only triumphalistically to display
biblical truth and not penitently to criticize Christian beliefs and practices.
(2) Boomershine sees historical criticism as the
biblical method of this era, where the
truth of the text is achieved
by personal study of the text in silence on your own.
If the church's theology were informed more
by biblical expectations of a redeemed creation and less
by general religious longings for ecstatic experience and timeless
truth, Christians would find themselves at the very least congenial toward those who, with a passionate «loyalty to things» and a «cosmic act of allegiance,» struggle to unpack the secrets of life on this planet and to work with it toward a new day.
He boldly integrates this insight with his trinitarian theology
by conceiving of the
biblical narrative as «the final
truth of God's own reality» in the mutual relations of God the Father, His incarnate Son, and the eschatological accomplishment of their communion
by the Spirit.
Science may tell us much that the
biblical writers did not know about the processes
by which God continually fashions an unfinished world, but it can not go beyond the great
truth stated in Genesis 1:1, «In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.»
By focusing on individual conversions apart from traditional church authorities that had, even for Protestants, provided the context for the communication of
biblical truth, the revivals encouraged individuals to appropriate Scripture for their own purposes.
A third danger to evangelical theology brought on
by inadequate reflection at the point of methodology is theology's tendency to reflect current opinion rather than
Biblical truth.
being verbally inspired, the
Biblical writers were also supernaturally enabled
by God to understand the best way to take certain non-revelational, cultural matters, and without changing them, use them to enhance the communication of revelational
truths to the original hearers or readers.47
A more sophisticated screening of Scripture is carried out
by others who claim that we must look in Scripture for the «locus classicus» of a
Biblical doctrine and concentrate on its teaching, interpreting all else in light of its
truth.
By complying with the pastor and his use of a
biblical directive, the council members allowed him to protect himself and them from the
truth.
No matter the obstacles, he said, Evangelicals and Catholics must stand side
by side in their public witness to
biblical truth.
Chuck was insistent that ECT was one of the most powerful initiatives in the United States for communicating the gospel and that, no matter the hurdles before us, Catholics and Evangelicals must stand side
by side in their public witness to
biblical truth.
The alleged subordination of the gospel to Karl Marx is illustrated, for example,
by charging that «false» liberation theology concentrates too much on a few selected
biblical texts that are always given a political meaning, leading to an overemphasis on «material» poverty and neglecting other kinds of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom of God with a purely «earthly» new society, so that the gospel is collapsed into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis on social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting of the reality of personal sin; that everything is reduced to praxis (the interplay of action and reflection) as the only criterion of faith, so that the notion of
truth is compromised; and that the emphasis on communidades de base sets a so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.
In «Myth and
Truth» he maintains that the truth of mythical utterances can be shown only by restating them in nonmythical terms.113 Yet adequately to demythologize Christian myths will require not just any nonmythological language but one, such as process philosophy provides, which can do justice to the biblical view of
Truth» he maintains that the
truth of mythical utterances can be shown only by restating them in nonmythical terms.113 Yet adequately to demythologize Christian myths will require not just any nonmythological language but one, such as process philosophy provides, which can do justice to the biblical view of
truth of mythical utterances can be shown only
by restating them in nonmythical terms.113 Yet adequately to demythologize Christian myths will require not just any nonmythological language but one, such as process philosophy provides, which can do justice to the
biblical view of God.
The
truth is that we have no business trying to impose our falsely fabricated morality on other people
by claiming it is «
biblical» when (1) it is not
biblical and (2) when we don't follow it ourselves.
For far from being a deviation from
biblical truth, this setting of man over against the sum total of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality of things themselves, are posited in the very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined
by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed
by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated
by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).
Perhaps equally sincere but no more worthy of the popularity they enjoy are the exegetical methods common today: selection, elimination, reduction to general
truths, modernizing
Biblical characters through popular jargon, or archaizing the present
by calling upon congregations to «go back to old Jericho for a few minutes this morning».
One rather begins with the Creator and the order of creation («Nature and Nature's God»)- in the case of the Founders, the
biblical God, even if for Jefferson and a few others attenuated
by Enlightenment rationalism - from which understanding certain
truths are established as self - evident.
A lot of these comments show the lack of
biblical teaching and understanding of scripture in the home, of course its hard to teach
biblical truth when the home is run
by to men.
But when the immense age of the earth became clearly evident on geological grounds, most fundamentalists tried to defend the «
truth» of the
biblical story
by interpreting the six days as six geological ages, thousands or even millions of years in length.
Written in informed engagement with current debates over the possibility of knowledge and
truth, this small book will reward careful reading also
by those who may dispute the author's interpretation of
biblical texts.
The cardinal's attempt to provide
biblical, patristic, medieval, and canonical arguments in favor of his proposal have been seriously criticized, in the proper academic sense of the term,
by responsible scholars (the standard reference here is Remaining in the
Truth of Christ: Marriage and Communion in the Catholic Church, edited
by Robert Dodaro, OSA [Ignatius Press]-RRB-.
The illusion of religious vitality frequently is maintained
by arguing the legalisms of
biblical stories which were written to lift us allegorically to insights about great
truths.
Interestingly, several of the doctrines we now hold firmly as «sound
biblical truth» were at first (and for about 200 years) considered
by the majority of people to be «heretical.»
Finally, the writer [apparently] operates on the mistaken view that if we can only get at least 51 percent of the voting populace to be swayed sufficiently
by our coalesced, power structure, emotional appeals, and
biblical truth (used only where it will work), then we can pass laws outlawing abortion.
The point here, however, is to draw out implications of the narrower
truth that a Christian congregation's social form is also shaped
by its social space, which in turn is importantly and distinctively, if not exhaustively, shaped
by the way
biblical writings are used in the congregation's common life.
Now that modernity is waning (a slower process than advertised
by some), this position will become more exposed as heresy
by its lack of support from the
biblical and orthodox
truth (the Bible does not teach what MacArthur is peddling and the church has historically not taught this) and
by its lack of cultural support, which was able to mask the lack of legitimate support for a while.
But I'm also struck
by how differently our culture — the American justice system to be specific — operates from this
biblical truth.
the
truth is the real
truth not the
biblical type that was written
by your ancestors.
There is one teaching authority, the pope, who both originates and finalizes such «
truth,» without having to listen to or be corrected
by other sources of insight such as the sensus fideli (the actual beliefs and practices of the people) and the scholarly reflections of
biblical exegetes and theologians.
By using each letter of the alphabet a Bible lesson is presented in an understandable and interactive format to teach core
truths concerning the Gospel, Godly Character, and
Biblical Manhood and Womanhood.
biblical truth for marriages Learning to Trust Your Spouse God's Way
By Brooke Keith Contributing Writer.
Alabama About Blog Simple life lessons and how to apply
biblical truth to our everyday life
by Craig Lee.
The root of the conflict was the
Biblical teaching that «The
truth will set you free» After and during the European Renaissance and Enlightenment, these ideas were revived and developed
by Descartes, Diderot, David Hume, Thomas Paine, Voltaire, Mary Wollstonecraft etc..
Alabama About Blog Simple life lessons and how to apply
biblical truth to our everyday life
by Craig Lee.
Our mission is to glorify God
by serving our neighbours, upholding
Biblical truth and growing in Christ together.
We respect your beliefs
by utilizing evidence - based methods of treatment while incorporating
biblical truths into your counseling sessions.
By sharing these
biblical truths and spiritual principles, and through the application of clinical skills and practical tools, Selena looks forward to facilitating the transformation that God so desires for our lives.
Our mission is to glorify God
by serving our neighbours, upholding
Biblical truth and growing in Christ together.