«Micro» and «macro» evolution are obfuscatory terms made up
by Creationists when they got backed into a corner and could no longer deny that evolution can be demonstrated.
Those are obfuscatory terms made up
by Creationists when they realized they couldn't deny evolution as an entirety anymore.
Not exact matches
As
creationists often do
when trying to attack evolution, they stack the deck
by raising a bunch of questions evolution makes no attempt to answer.
You feel insulted and «dehumanized»
when creationists say that people were created in the image and likeness of God, but you have no problem with the evolutionist claim that we all evolved from slime
by a cosmic accident.
Also,
when the
creationists say that god created the earth etc in 6 days, what exactly do they mean
by «god».
Ok, what I'm most discouraged
by when it comes to Bill Nye's response is that he's assumming that either one is a young earth
creationist, or an evolutionist.
The Evolution of Charles Darwin A
creationist when he visited the Galápagos Islands, Darwin grasped the significance of the unique wildlife he found there What: Father of the Theory of Evolution
by Natural Selection Charles Darwin's theory of evolution
by natural selection is hailed in the mainstream
When I was «debating» evolution vs. creationism in DebunkCreation with
creationists, every few weeks we would have a
creationist come
by with only a first name claiming to be a scientist but would refuse to even mention what his speciality was — and it soon became quite clear that the «scientist» knew very little about the scientific method or any area of science he chose to discuss, and as such was clearly not a scientist.
Just like the
creationists, they can cerrypick a lot of out - of - contex or out - of - date studies to produce an apparently persuasive case, but it all falls apart
when confronted
by someone with actual expertise.
Jeff Indeed —
when proxy variability and problems are not only exaggerated but deliberately maxed up
by publishing papers with a deliberate inclusion of many unreliable and contradictory proxies to flatten climate records (Shakun, Marcott), the alarmist camp is in
creationist territory — «you cant trust fossils».