«How to get a handle on potential risks posed
by fracking fluids.»
But perusing newspapers from towns where fracking is going on reveals how the issue refuses to die, with headlines like «Fears of Tainted Water Well Up in Colorado,» «Collateral Damage: Residents Fear Murky Effects of Energy Boom,» and «Worker Believes Cancer Caused
by Fracking Fluids» appearing regularly.
They shared stories and fears of water being contaminated
by fracking fluid; the political class reeled.
Not exact matches
Rozell said that the recycling of
fracking fluid is helping to reduce the amount of water produced
by each natural gas well, but the
fluid can usually only be reused once.
«
By measuring naturally occurring ammonium and iodide in numerous samples from different geological formations in the Appalachian Basin, including flowback waters from shale gas wells in the Marcellus and Fayetteville shale formations, we show that
fracking fluids are not much different from conventional oil and gas wastes,» said Jennifer S. Harkness, lead author of the study and a PhD student at Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment.
Some of the findings in the report also directly contradict longstanding arguments
by the drilling industry for why the
fracking process is safe: that hydrologic pressure would naturally force
fluids down, not up; that deep geologic layers provide a watertight barrier preventing the movement of chemicals towards the surface; and that the problems with the cement and steel barriers around gas wells aren't connected to
fracking.
Before production can commence, the well must be «completed»
by removal of the
fracking fluids, which contain gas that can escape to the air.
Investigations
by The New York Times last winter revealed that sewage - treatment plants processing
fracking wastewater are discharging radioactive
fluid into public waterways, in some cases upstream of intake sites for drinking water.
Fracking — or hydraulic fracturing — is a process in which rocks are deliberately fractured to release oil or gas
by injecting highly pressurised
fluid into a borehole.
Those cracks are then held open
by sand that had been added to the
fracking fluid.
The 600 - plus - page report that resulted looks at a variety of ways
fracking could have an effect on local drinking water: withdrawing millions of gallons of water needed to
frack a well, improperly mixing chemicals with the water at the well, injecting that
fracking fluid into the ground at high pressure to fracture rock as much as two miles beneath the surface, handling the contaminated water then produced
by the well and finally improperly storing or disposing of that water.
Well, they just passed a law here in Texas stating that shale oil companies will be required
by law to disclose the ingredients in their «
fracking»
fluids.
«And
by the industry not being willing to disclose what's in those
fracking fluids, they have created the environmental activism that they so dislike.»
In the past two years alone, a series of surface spills, including two blowouts at wells operated
by Chesapeake Energy and EOG Resources and a spill of 8000 gallons of
fracking fluid at a site in Dimock, Pa., have contaminated groundwater in the Marcellus Shale region.
But the idea stressed
by fracking critics that deep - injected
fluids will migrate into groundwater is mostly false.
So you could say Food & Water Watch is technically correct when it tries to scare people
by saying
fracking fluids contain «toxic chemicals.»
The method combines a new form of horizontal drilling with hydraulic fracturing — more commonly known as
fracking GThe process blasts open fissures in underground shale - rock formations
by injecting a high pressure combination of
fluids, chemicals and proppants causing the fossil fuel to flow to the production well.