Sentences with phrase «by justice john»

The 1895 decision in Sparf v. U.S., [24] written by Justice John Marshall Harlan held that a trial judge has no responsibility to inform the jury of the right to nullify laws.

A concurring opinion by Justice John Paul Stevens means that the decision will most likely have to be applied on a case - by - case basis, looking at different types of statutes that states have enacted to place limitations on class actions.»

But much attention has focused on the concurring opinion written by Justice John M. Greaney and joined by Justice Roderick L. Ireland.

The typical objection is that expressed quite forcefully by Justice John Major, an unusual public pronouncement on legislation for a Supreme Court judge not speaking «ex cathedra.»

The ruling, Montejo v. Louisiana, reverses Michigan v. Jackson, a 6 - 3 decision, written by Justice John Paul Stevens, holding that the Sixth Amendment prevents police from initiating further interrogation of a defendant who has requested but not yet had an opportunity to consult with counsel.

INEC had suspended the recall process against Melaye after it was served with an order granted by Justice John Tsoho of the Federal High Court, Abuja which directed the commission to maintain the status quo pending the determination of the suit that Melaye filed to challenge his recall process.

But on 13th December, 2017, a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja declared Obiora Okonkwo of the PDP as senator representing Anambra central senatorial district in a judgement delivered by Justice John Tsoho.

But on December 13, a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja declared Obiora Okonkwo of the PDP as the senator representing Anambra Central Senatorial District in a judgment delivered by Justice John Tsoho.

A Federal High Court in Abuja presided over by Justice John Tsoho, had in January 2017 ordered the Oyo State Independent Election Commission (OYSIEC) not to proceed with its plan to conduct the election earlier slated for February 11.

Her dissent was joined by Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter and Stephen G. Breyer.

Not exact matches

Barrister John Vaughan has been appointed a judge of the WA Supreme Court, filling the vacancy left by the resignation of Justice Peter Martino.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, both conservatives, hinted during an hour - long argument in the case at support for the Justice Department's stance that because Microsoft is based in the United States it was obligated to turn over data sought by prosecutors in a U.S. warrant.

In his dissent, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote that the Constitution «had nothing to do with» that ruling by the court majority.

Following a controversial New York Times editorial by former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Tuesday calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment, we asked readers to respond, offering not only the news of Stevens» stance, but also a Chicago Tribune editorial taking the other side of the issue.

Fried Frank Of Counsel and author of the leading False Claims Act treatise, John T. Boese (on left), and his partner Douglas W. Baruch, offered insightful analysis on two recent Department of Justice policy documents (the «Granston Memo» and the «Brand Memo») and their impact on FCA actions by both qui tam relators and federal prosecutors.

Following a controversial New York Times editorial by former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens Tuesday calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment, we asked readers to respond, offering not only the news of Stevens» stance, but also a Chicago Tribune editorial taking the other side of...

His retirement announcement takes place before a review of MLA salaries and benefits, led by retired Justice John Major, can take place.

Back in December, Trump lawyer John Dowd claimed that it was impossible for Trump to be guilty of obstruction of justice, simply because he's the president — an assertion that was roundly derided by legal experts.

Pope John Paul II forcefully articulated this logic in his great but oft overlooked encyclical of 1980, Dives in Misericordia, where he affirms the importance of justice» meaning rights and desert» but goes on to argue that justice alone, detached from love and untempered by mercy, is prone to collapse into spite, hatred, and even cruelty.

The best single article I've seen on the moral case for parental choice in education is «School Choice as Simple Justice,» published in First Things (April 1992) and written by Prof. John Coons of the law school of the University of California, Berkeley.

This deep sense of natural justice afforded by the state for the home is echoed by Pope Benedict's analysis of John of Salisbury (c1120 — 1180), an English author, educationalist, diplomat and secretary to St Thomas Becket, the martyred Archbishop of Canterbury.

If it was John Milton's task in Paradise Lost to «justify the ways of God to men,» Dante before him had taken on the responsibility of showing that all that is found in this world and in the next is measured by justice.

Rather, they betray the totalitarianism of a false Utopia, warned of by John Paul II, which arises when justice is detached from freedom.

That document, upheld several years later by Pope John Paul II's «Evangelium Vitae,» mapped for the first time the Church's teachings on social justice issues.

Of special interest are statements by Bishop John Carroll of Baltimore on Catholic understandings of the American constitutional order, and several documents from the hand of Bishop («Dagger John») Hughes of New York on sundry questions, including an illuminating exchange with Bishop Patrick Lynch of Charleston on the justice of the Union cause in the Civil War.

Jesus used it to help the community see that because they were not open to hear and accept the way of justice and righteousness brought by John, they did not repent and change.

It is this latter conception of exchange justice that is implied in John Paul II's endorsement of the market, especially in his assertion (CA, No. 32) that the price of a commodity is determined by contractual agreement between buyer and seller.

The first report, commissioned by the National Review Board, consisted of the findings of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice on the incidence and nature of sex abuse by Catholic clergy from 1950 to 2002.

He cites in support of his claim John XXIII's statement in his 1963 encyclical Pacem in Terris that «it is hardly possible to imagine that in an atomic era war could be used as an instrument of justice,» and a similar statement by Benedict XVI.

The language may not be stirring, but the thought is a clear development of John Paul II's observations in his great social encyclical, Centesimus Annus:» [P] rior to the logic of a fair exchange of goods and the forms of justice appropriate to it, there exists something which is due to man because he is man, by reason of his lofty dignity» (35).

That is, that one of the main reasons for his attack on Darwinism is his conclusion that insufficiently critical adoption of evolutionary modes of thought by the majority of scientists, and also by educational (e.g., John Dewey) and legal (e.g., Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.) leaders, has led to a highly unsatisfactory cultural situation, and to many evil consequences.

Those who came to be baptized by John publicly declared in front of the entire crowd that when they entered the water they were part of the corrupt Judaism, but when they came back up out of the water they no longer identified with the corrupt way of doing things, but were now part of the new order of God which would follow and obey Him in righteousness and justice.

I was told Jesus claimed to be God in the flesh (John 1:14 n Phil 2:5 ff; et al.) I was told that in about 30AD Jesus let himself be executed for a crime he did not commit as a way of satisfying Justice for all our injustices — like one who pays a penalty owed by another.

Jencks» approach was given an elaborate theoretical justification a few years later by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice.

Justice John Paul Stevens (joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg) stated: «Although much ink is spilled today describing the gruesome nature of late «term abortion procedures, that rhetoric does not provide me a reason to believe that the procedure Nebraska here claims it seeks to ban is more brutal, more gruesome, or less respectful of «potential life» than the equally gruesome procedure [D&E] Nebraska claims it still allows.»

The study, initiated in 2006, was conducted by a team of researchers at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York City at a cost of $ 1.8 million.

The USCCB website invites us a little coyly to «Dive in deep into the Church's teachings»: this can be done by going to one of the site's most valuable pages, which gives links to statements on marriage by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the Second Vatican Council, Pope Benedict XVI, Pope John Paul II, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Pontifical Council for the Family and the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace.

No sooner did I return to Boston than the Obergefell decision came down, with the ominous absence, pointed out by Chief Justice John Roberts in his dissent, of the key word «exercise» from the majority opinion.

John Donahue has characterized the biblical ideal of justice (sedaqah) by calling it «fidelity to the demands of a relationship.»

With Justice for All: A Strategy for Community Development By John Perkins «I am persuaded that the Church, as the steward of this Gospel, holds the key to justicJustice for All: A Strategy for Community Development By John Perkins «I am persuaded that the Church, as the steward of this Gospel, holds the key to justicejustice in...

One by Senator John Danforth, Resurrection, takes Thomas» side, and the other by Jane Mayer and Jill Abramson, Strange Justice, takes Hill's side.

From Monday, Justice John Mansfield, the president of the Australian Competition Tribunal, Novartis group general counsel Ray Steinwall and University of South Australia economics professor David Round — who were on Friday named as members of the tribunal reviewing the deal — will begin to digest Mr Helou's great big pitch: that the benefits of increasing scale by allowing the nation's biggest dairy processor to acquire smaller rival Warrnambool Cheese & Butter outweigh any destruction to local competition.

An advertiser's announcement in the media on Tuesday entitled: «In the investigative committee (Article 146); In the matter of a petition by Anas Aremeyaw Anas for the removal from office of Justice John Ajet Nassam», the committee noted: «You are hereby notified that following a prima facie case established against you on allegation of misconduct for ex-parte discussion with one party on a case pending before you...»

Justice John Tsoho of Federal High Court, Abuja who adjourned hearing in the trial of Kanu with his co-defendants in a motion of notice filed on their behalf by Barrister Ifeanyi Ejiofor, asked the Judge to disqualify himself from hearing the case over alllegations of «manifest bias.»

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Ronald Zweibel denied the request made by John Haggerty's attorneys to give the Forest Hills resident probation for his October -LSB-...]

Delivering judgment on Tuesday, Justice John Tsoho, in giving the EFCC a go - ahead to continue and conclude its ongoing investigations, struck out the fundamental human rights enforcement suit filed by the former First Lady against the anti-graft agency.

Prosecutors say that email records seized by investigators show that Pigeon traded favors with Supreme Court Justice John Michalek.

Justice John Tshoho became the second judge to withdraw from the case after the decision by Justice Ahmed Mohammed who earlier pulled out of the case having been accused of bias by the accused.

TOTENBERG: Prodded by Chief Justice John Roberts, Kagan said repeatedly that Congress was justified in banning corporate spending in candidate elections because corporate money is other people's money.

In its statement, McDonnell's defense team, led by Hank Asbill, John Brownlee and Noel Francisco, said it believed that the Justice Department «brought this case in good faith based on its view of the law as it existed at the time.»