Sentences with phrase «by opinion matters»

Canvassing the opinions of over 500 teachers nationwide, our survey carried out by Opinion Matters also confirmed that teachers believe school trips add value to education, bringing subject teaching to life and provides vital social and cultural benefits.

Not exact matches

One opinion out there says that content of a certain age doesn't matter, that Google (and Panda) knows that older content is often ignored by readers and is more or less irrelevant.

There is no dearth of strong opinions on the matter, as evidenced by the many vocal protests of trade deals in progress and the continuing protectionist discourse during the U.S. presidential election.

It doesn't matter to me whether this is «correct» exegesis — either the Bible finds some way of adapting to the modern notions of morality, or it gets left by the wayside on the ever growing dung - heap of rejected holy texts of human history — in my opinion, that's the historical moment we are currently faced with.

As to Fred's opinion or Chuckled's opinion «the way» made clear by Jesus is not a matter of opinion.

«If there is any fixed star in our const.itutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.»

You know that God's Word is of the utmost importance, and by it we know of Him and know His opinions on certain matters, not least being the nature of humanity.

I'm aware of all the ways these passages are explained away by adherents of ET — I used to defend such views and they all fail in my opinion, no matter how logical they may seem.

No man [should] be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor [should he] be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor... otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief... All men [should] be free to profess and by argument to maintain their opinions in matters of religion, and... the same [should] in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities.

You may have to recognize that truth is a threat to a culture created by the mass expression of unexamined opinions, and is best kept to the circle of those for whom it really matters.

That's a matter Christian opinion vs Athiest opinion, and can not be proven or disproved by either side, since it's a matter of FAITH.

The rabbis who taught in the synagogues held varied opinions on many matters, but when we view them as a whole in their relation to non-Jewish developments and to heretical movements (such as Gnosticism), we are impressed by their unity.

Mark 16:9 - 20 is said to be by a different author from the rest of the Gospel, and the implication is allowed that the author of the rest of Mark (who actually appears not to be the Mark we meet in the NT) perhaps leaves belief in the Resurrection as a matter of opinion.

In the opinion of the FCC, the representativeness of religious faith presented on television is a matter to be decided solely by a television station if it wishes to venture to do so.

A matter so strenuously debated is not to be settled by a few casual comments; yet certain facts and agreed opinions have in the heat of controversy received less than their proper attention.

If you have an informed opinion about something, and you think it matters, by all means you should attempt to convince others.

The impression could all too easily be prompted in the minds of thoughtful parishioners that a long awaited gesture of compassion towards a downtrodden group had been blocked, yet again, by the outdated ideas of a few crusty clerics, and that it is only a matter of time before such conservatism crumbles in the face of popular opinion.

These claims had generated the opinion in psychiatric circles that one's «sex» and one's «gender» were distinct matters, sex being genetically and hormonally determined from conception, while gender was culturally shaped by the actions of family and others during childhood.

I don't consider him a subject matter expert in anything but his own opinions, which by the way are very skewed and do not contribute to an intelligent conversation.

This difference of opinion is a matter of judgment; it can not, I think, be settled by arguments from authority.

It seems, moreover, on the basis of public opinion polls, that this challenge is already accepted by a majority of our fellow citizens and thus the question of its establishment as a matter of law has not provoked a debate worthy of the momentous issues at stake.

Objections from Cardinals Cajetan and Carvajal that the text was unscholarly and inaccurate in its failure to make distinctions between matters of doctrine, discipline and opinion, were overruled by the majority.

«Be it therefore enacted by the General Assembly, that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship place or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and the same shall in nowise diminish, enlarge, or afflict these civil capacities.»

No matter what Vic or any of his Christian toadies think or feel or want, this matter has already been decided by a majority of public opinion and the religious bigots already know they are on the wrong side of history.

Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?

De-humanization regularly occurs when the person wishes to feel superior to another, by ingraining in their mind that the opposition is less than human, and therefore their opinion does not matter as much.

In this context, the tragedy of Oliver North is that the opinions, thoughts and feelings of the people and their elected representatives concerning aid to the contras did not matter; what seemed to matter, in an unabashed exercise of unilateral power, was the provision of such aid, by whatever means, in the name of the national interest, patriotism, and fighting communism, by people who in their actions were claiming they knew what was best for the United States.

In the end the matter was determined by the consensus of opinion of the church as a whole.

I find it amusing that you're getting so worked up by others opinions on such a trivial matter.

A bad game by the match officials doesn't gloss over Wenger's and the teams in adequacies in my opinion over a sustained period of time but of course why does that matter when we as fans are told by Ivan we're punching above our weight, the club, our club has so many problems its scary but bad linesman and refs we can't.

Now it is understandable in my opinion to think that perhaps Wenger's reasoning is that Lucas may not entirely be ready to take the Premier League by storm, given that player do need time to adapt, however the subs used in the Chelsea game changed my perspective on the matter.

What would fit more in line with your opinions of Arsene Wenger would be if you were saying or replying that you are not bothered by the transfer market one iota because it doesn't matter how many new faces arrive as Arsene is incapable of reaching the summit.

Football is a matter of opinions in some ways, even though it is on paper a simple game that is about getting a round bag full of wind into an oversized net, and this is highlighted perfectly by the very different sections of Arsenal fans that have become known as the WOB and the AKBs.

Personally I think it is combination of a loss of confidence after getting mauled by Bayern Munich, and the ongoing uncertainty about Wenger's future, but whatever the reason the fact is that the Gunners now have to regain their composure quickly to try and win a place back in the Top Four, and also they still have the possibility of going to the FA Cup Final, no matter what our opinion of the matter.

I think I have every right and am fully justified by changing my opinion on the matter.

Fans by all means can have their own opinions and discussions, but at the end of the day for any club in the world, the only noise of the fans that truly matters is the noise made in the stadium on matchday.

Now this is just my opinion on the matter, the season is young and things could very well turn around as last season City and Chelsea were separated only alphabetically by January 1st so the fierce start of City doesn't phase me.

And like true sheep led by media opinion, all the chel $ ki fan's that have come here to comment have pretty much cloned what's in the British media, failing to mention Ramires, or Terry, or Dave for that matter.

Owen's opinion on the matter will be shared by many Liverpool fans.

I enjoyed reading your opinion on this controversial matter until you went the other way by saying, «I don't think the possible risk is worth it unless you really hate the tattoo and just can't wait.»

Like it or not, our views and opinions and even beliefs are shaped by the media we consume, and I just can't help but think that if we had a better representation of breastfeeding, the decision to breastfeed (or not to breastfeed, for that matter) would be used as a reason to judge and shame mothers.

Perhaps over-exploring the principles of freedom of expression and free speech and candid independent opinion, some leading members of the party poured their hearts out on several vexed matters including what they termed a uni-polar power bloc control and grips of the party especially by the presidential candidate, «Dr».

It believes the BNI went beyond its jurisdiction by «expressing opinions as to who is or is not culpable in the matter.»

In particular, local media attention matters: it's often easier to get than national coverage, it lets you leverage your local activists and it can lead to much broader distribution of your story if it gets on a newswire (even local blogs can help, since they may be disproportionately read by elected officials and other opinion leaders and can also serve as a source for national blogs — see this article for details).

the fact that the outcome positions of the entire court can almost always be foretold just by looking at the subject matter of a case says that it is a court of private opinion - not of proper, dispassionate legal interpretation.

«This is my answer no matter how many times you tell me: There was a legal opinion by David Lewis, our legal counsel, saying it was proper to do,» he said when asked if the conference was seeking an independent legal opinion.

Others have asked for the matter to be addressed — either through an investigation or an advisory opinion — by the office of state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.

If the State concerned does not comply with the opinion within the period laid down by the Commission, the latter may bring the matter before the Court of Justice of the European Union.

This by extension and in the opinion of CADA means that no private or state institution can directly or indirectly get involved in matters of elections without the express permission of EC and once the permission is given, EC must have oversight responsibility to ensure that activities, actions and inactions of any private, public institution or individual involved in elections do not impinge on the integrity of the electoral process.

«Even assuming that the contention is true, by petitioners» own acknowledgment the mathematical formula to calculate the size of the Senate is not a matter upon which public opinion should have any influence.»