Sentences with phrase «by a conclusion about»

Then a look at pragmatic operations with inside and outside locations will be followed by a conclusion about the container - content relation in general.

Not exact matches

The study was funded by EnCana, the drilling company whose wells the EPA had initially blamed for the contamination.Though the role of fracking remains contested, the advising scientists recommend that the EPA should qualify its conclusions about the risks posed by acknowledging gaps in the existing data and concerning cases like Pavillion.

But over the years, employers have reached differing conclusions about how the Act's language should be interpreted — specifically the line that says employers must treat pregnant women the same as «other persons not so affected [by pregnancy] but similar in their ability or inability to work.»

(By the way, as you read the conclusions keep in mind the authors are not talking just about high - tech entrepreneurs.

These happy vibes are heard by a founder's «happy ears» — often leading the founder to draw false conclusions about the true level of potential VC interest.

The relationship between monetary policy and financial stability may depend on the specific economic conditions in which we find ourselves.6 Moreover, the processes resulting in financial cycles, with periods of unsustainable debt buildup, occasional crises and periods of deleveraging, are not well captured by standard models.7 We have more work to do before we can be fully confident about our conclusions.

In conclusion: By applying a creative methodology that tapped certain skills and developing a system of deliberate practice where I would focus on the weak parts of my skill set I was about to climb up the link building mountain and enjoy the view.

Before any of you doth protest too much about this conclusion, let me explain the rationale for my inclusion of diversification strategy among the other much better known systemically fraudulent practices regularly engaged in by big commercial brokerage firms and banks.

By their very nature, forward - looking statements require us to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, which give rise to the possibility that our predictions, forecasts, projections, expectations or conclusions will not prove to be accurate, that our assumptions may not be correct and that our forward - looking statements, including statements about the specific share repurchase program forming part of the normal course issuer bid by Royal Bank of Canada, will not be achieveBy their very nature, forward - looking statements require us to make assumptions and are subject to inherent risks and uncertainties, which give rise to the possibility that our predictions, forecasts, projections, expectations or conclusions will not prove to be accurate, that our assumptions may not be correct and that our forward - looking statements, including statements about the specific share repurchase program forming part of the normal course issuer bid by Royal Bank of Canada, will not be achieveby Royal Bank of Canada, will not be achieved.

We're also seeing overreactions by investors who have been quick to draw conclusions about what it all means before the dust has settled.

One conclusion from this episode is that learning about the stock market may feed back into the market and, by changing the behavior of the market, render our «learning» useless or — if we don't recognize the feedback effect — hazardous.

The combination of low levels of ES funds and the cash rate remaining close to its target suggests a couple of conclusions: first, the market players involved with RTGS have adapted well to operating in the new environment; and second, participants have reasonable confidence about the availability of cash near the interest rate announced by the Reserve Bank as its policy target.

... Only until what we are told and instructed on how to live by others - parents - society... As if none of us have a consciousness thought on our own conclusion of life... Something to think about...

«As I said, overextending applications based upon conclusions brought about by preconceived worldviews while observing data.»

There has been much spurious research and false conclusions drawn by those known as «anti-Mormons» to lead people to a bad impression of a man who was about as good a man who ever lived - save Jesus, of course.

If you can't name him right away, check Google... for reliability use Google to find out a report made public by the Johns Hopkins Universiity Blloomberg School of Public Health about the estimated figures on civilian casualties during the Iraq invasion... Just so you be aware that we too in America have our «Hitler», so publicly paraded in San Francisco, Rome and other places in the world during the height of the Iraqi invasion and make your own conclusion...

If we recognize that in order to draw conclusions about matters of this sort, we must ask questions not answered by faith in any direct way, the tone of our debates can be improved.

«I'll pray about it» I certainly would throw that into the same bag as «the will of the Lord» for you or myself by someone else, is always generated by their personal prejudices, what don't appeal to them is not the will of the Lord, I came to that conclusion only year's after the damage was already done.

Yet, I would feel better about the conclusions reached by Scaperlanda if he could quote from statistics that were less than a decade or more old.

Were any of these people alive today and involved in molecular biology in addition to physics, they would be amazed at the facts we have managed to gather about the world and probably independently come to the conclusion of evolution by natural selection.

No, we are not to judge the soul of the person, but surely we can come to an obvious conclusion about someone by judging their actions.

This conclusion also leads to a more general point about the nature of culture that is consistent with the previously mentioned criticism leveled by Zaret against the idea of abstract values legitimating practical ethics.

Hyper Calvinist should, by logical conclusion, just take their own lives because the end has been determined and there is nothing they can do about it.

Matthew marks the conclusions of the discourse (7:28 - 29) with his usual formula («And when Jesus finished these sayings»), completing the sentence with the statement made by Mark and Luke about Jesus» teaching in the synagogue at Capernaum (cf. Mk 1:22; Lk 4:32): «the crowds were astonished at his teaching, for he taught them as one who had authority, and not as their scribes.»

The story opened in a swank Protestant church where at the conclusion of the service a poor, unemployed, shabby young man got up and told his story of unemployment to the startled parishioners and ended by saying: «You can't all go out hunting up jobs for people like me, but what I am puzzled about when I see so many Christians living in luxury and singing, «Jesus, I my cross have taken, all to leave, and follow Thee,» is what is meant by following Jesus?

I want to know if they think physicist Paul Davie is right about the obvious creation of universe governing physical laws, if Einstein was right in a God presence and what they think about quantum mechanics that goes back to von Neumann, where one is led by its logic (as Wigner and Peierls were) to the conclusion that not everything is just matter in motion.

Since the doctrine of sin is the only element known by some of his critics, a common conclusion is that Niebuhr was too pessimistic about human nature, that he saw only man's sin, and that he offered no proximate or ultimate hope.

But if this is «what actually happens», it's hard to resist drawing the conclusion that in the outcry against Dawkins this summer we saw an extraordinary moment when society expressed moral outrage about itself; when we were provoked by one of our own common practices.

These are better understood as conclusions about Christ reached by disciples than his assertions about himself.

A key conclusion in Joseph Shaw's helpful report was that «After about 1960, give or take a year or two, growth by all measures went into startling reverse.»

And we must not forget that a quantum - mechanical calculation even on one particular bacterial cell would be incorrect for every other cell, even of the same species — a point clearly made by Elsasser in his conclusions about the heterogeneity of the material with which the biologist has to deal.

Biblically conservative Christians today rightly reject recreational sex as a psychologizing of Scripture if undisciplined sexual behavior is justified by conclusions drawn from modern theories about sexual repression.

Theological hesitations in the 1960s about the church in its congregational form were thus reinforced by both sociological conclusions and ecumenical convictions.

The most remarkable aspect about this reaction is that the Moynihan report itself took great pains to identify white bigotry as the fundamental cause of the breakdown of the black family: «There is a considerable body of evidence,» says the report, «to support the conclusion that Negro social structure, in particular the Negro family, battered and harassed by discrimination, injustice, and uprooting, is in the deepest trouble.»

Many centuries later John Henry Newman, in part stimulated by the Tractarian controversies over the rival claims of the State and secular learning versus the claims of theology, came to a similar conclusion about the primacy of theology without having to reject secular learning.

Off hand, the conclusion would appear to be that a being having the logical limit of power would have power sufficient to bring about a state of affairs (S) even if S were precluded by a metaphysical principle.

But each time I read books, blogs or articles about the topic (granted that I am more inclined to read stuff written by people who are really serious about their relationship with God rather than people complaining merely because they can — and thereâ $ ™ s plenty of them), I come to one conclusion: The complaints are mostly about what the church has become (or how people perceive the church to be) than against the church itself.

It is telling that they themselves appear uneasy about this conclusion and follow it with an observation that casts a fundamental doubt on it: «The procedure still introduces a third party by having someone else do the insemination.»

It is now known that Copernicus reached his conclusions by about 1530, but they were not published until 1543 the year of his death, in a book entitled, The Revolutions of the Celestial Orbs.

Sure, I disagree with some of your conclusions about the word «salvation» (and by the way, Ephesiasn 2:1 - 10 defines what «salvation» is in Ephesians) and that the term «gospel» is a technical term for what must be beleived to be born again.

Palmer makes it clear that though there must have been some doubt, dogmatically, about this in Luther's time, and in the nineteenth century, the conclusion must be drawn that the Church has definitely declined to believe that a plenary indulgence transferred by prayer to a soul in purgatory can guarantee its release, though the Church hopes, as it were, that Christ will respect her wishes in the matter.

I recall quite vividly a survey on sex by Time magazine about 20 years ago, in which they came to the conclusion that married Christian couples were among the most sexually active (though least promiscuous) and the most satisfied, with objective data to back up their findings.

Consequently his epistemology avoids the pitfalls of nineteenth century Traditionalism which, carried to its logical conclusion, by undermining the possibility of any rational discourse about reality - and God as its ultimate cause - leads either to radical scepticism or fideism.

He died at the age of thirty - nine, after about two years of imprisonment, just several days before his prison camp was liberated by the Allies, and less than a month before the conclusion of the war in Europe.

It is difficult to put all the evidence in such a matter into words, to gather up into a distinct statement all that one bases one's conclusions on, but I have always felt that I had abundant evidence to justify (to myself, at least) the conclusion that I came to then, and since have held to, that the physical change which came at that time was, first, the result of a change wrought within me by a change of mental state; and secondly, that that change of mental state was not, save in a very secondary way, brought about through the influence of an excited imagination, or a consciously received suggestion of an hypnotic sort.

It's then Senator O'Brien's turn to insult the ACCC, claiming that its conclusions about aspects of the market being workably competitive are perhaps a bit dishonest and self interested because it «decides how many processors there are by ruling over which acquisitions take place».

In conclusion, while YOU might see nothing more then a blond - hair, blue - eyed young man trying to help provide a temprorary home to the less fortunate, I know enough about football to never trust a offense in the playoffs if there being led by an Arian Foster.

I argue that much of the sudden rise in our expectations was under - pinned by false assumptions made at the time about our perceived prospects — our expectations — of winning the League and it therefore follows that whilst the major part of this disappointment was due to the teams dip in performance — my second conclusion is that at least some of our huge disappointment was undoubtedly down to us fans (aided and abetted by the media) getting carried away with our expectations.

This retro thinking about the SB just reinforces the conclusion that we need to upgrade the LBs on our roster... by two or three.

The role has emerged more by chance than by design and therefore it's difficult to draw too many conclusions about the intention of coaches using such players.