Former state Senate Leader Dean Skelos and his son Adam saw their federal corruption convictions overturned
by a federal appeals court panel Tuesday.
Not exact matches
An attorney for Bayou Bridge Pipeline LLC told a
federal appeals court panel in Houston Monday that it'll be providing «appropriate compensation»
by re-establishing forested wetlands elsewhere in the swamp.
Jan. 17, 2014: First of 10 applications filed in
Federal Court and the
Federal Appeal Court by environmental and First Nations groups seeking judicial review of
panel recommendation to approve project.
A three - man
panel of the
Court of
Appeal led
by Justice Helen Ogunwumiju, unanimously agreed with the decision of Justice A.M. Liman of the
Federal High
Court in Enugu that there was no legal basis to grant the prayer sought
by the former Chief Judge.
THE battle to determine the standard - bearer of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Bayelsa State, on Thursday, shifted to the
Court of
Appeal, Abuja Division, as Governor Timipre Sylva told the five - man
panel, headed
by Justice Zainab Bulkachuwa, that the PDP had invoked its jurisdiction in order to stall hearing of the substantive matter at the
Federal High
Court sitting in Abuja.
The
appeal court panel led by Yargata Nimpar overturned the ruling which was delivered by Okon Abang of the Federal High Court in
court panel led
by Yargata Nimpar overturned the ruling which was delivered
by Okon Abang of the
Federal High
Court in
Court in 2015.
A five - man
panel of the apex
court led by Justice Tanko Muhammad unanimously affirmed the February 20, 2015, judgment of the Court of Appeal in Lagos which had overturned the Federal High Court's decision striking out the cha
court led
by Justice Tanko Muhammad unanimously affirmed the February 20, 2015, judgment of the
Court of Appeal in Lagos which had overturned the Federal High Court's decision striking out the cha
Court of
Appeal in Lagos which had overturned the
Federal High
Court's decision striking out the cha
Court's decision striking out the charges.
The
Court of
Appeal Panel led
by Justice Ibrahim Salauwa, which was set up to determine the
appeals filed
by Makarfi and Jegede against the judgment given
by Justice Okon Abang of the
Federal High
Court, which INEC relied on to pick Mr. Jimoh Ibrahim, adjourned all proceedings indefinitely.
A
panel of judges from the U.S. Ninth Circuit
Court of
Appeals is expected to rule this week on whether a temporary halt placed on the order
by a
federal district judge should be kept in place.
The state of Texas today sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in a
federal appeals court in Washington DC, claiming four new regulations imposed
by the EPA are based on the «thoroughly discredited» findings of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change and are «factually flawed,» 1200 WOAI news reports.
«That
panel decision was subsequently affirmed
by the U.S.
Court of
Appeals for the
Federal Circuit, which set aside an $ 86.5 million infringement verdict won
by the company,» says the NLJ.
• Latest decision adds to split between
panels, creating uncertainty pending further action
by Congress or the U.S.
Court of
Appeals for the
Federal Circuit.
Administrative law — Judicial review — Municipal law — Taxation — Real property tax — Payments made
by Federal Crown in lieu of real property tax — Assessed value of Halifax Citadel — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister is unconstrained by the assessed value of the property determined by the assessment authority in determining the property value of a federal property for purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c.
Federal Crown in lieu of real property tax — Assessed value of Halifax Citadel — Whether the
Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister is unconstrained by the assessed value of the property determined by the assessment authority in determining the property value of a federal property for purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c.
Federal Court of
Appeal erred in holding that the Minister is unconstrained
by the assessed value of the property determined
by the assessment authority in determining the property value of a
federal property for purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c.
federal property for purposes of the PILT Act — Whether the
Federal Court of Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c.
Federal Court of
Appeal erred in holding that the Minister acted reasonably in determining the property value of the Halifax Citadel lands (adopting the determination of the Dispute Advisory
Panel appointed under the Act), and in particular in valuing the portion of the lands upon which are located improvements which are exempt from payments in lieu of taxes, representing 47 of 49 acres of the site, at $ 10 — Whether the
Court should consider the present case as it raises similar issues as Montréal (City) v. Montréal Port Authority 2010 SCC 14, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 427, but from the perspective of assessed value — Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. M - 13.
Until the recent Sixth Circuit decision, the most important invocation of Bush v. Gore
by a
federal appeals court probably came in a 2006 case decided
by a different
panel of the same
court.
«[T] he weight of authority suggests that accurate news reporting — even when it is likely to have an adverse impact on the subjects of the report — usually does not give rise to an action for intentional infliction of emotional distress»: Yesterday, a unanimous three - judge
panel of the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a decision affirming a federal district court's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual ass
Court of
Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a decision affirming a
federal district
court's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual ass
court's dismissal of claims for invasion of privacy and intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted
by two former undercover police officers against a television station in Albuquerque that had revealed their identities and their undercover status in the context of a televised report about their suspected involvement in an alleged incident of sexual assault.
A pretty large volume of the entire U.S.
Court of Appeals docket involves sentencing decisions where guilt is not disputed, and surely panel sentencing in cases with potentially long sentences would reduce that and might even be money saving for the federal judicial branch as a whole despite the extra effort invested at the trial court level, in addition to furthering justice by balancing out extreme sta
Court of
Appeals docket involves sentencing decisions where guilt is not disputed, and surely
panel sentencing in cases with potentially long sentences would reduce that and might even be money saving for the
federal judicial branch as a whole despite the extra effort invested at the trial
court level, in addition to furthering justice by balancing out extreme sta
court level, in addition to furthering justice
by balancing out extreme stances.