Sentences with phrase «by a new author because»

If I never get around to reading a book by a new author because I never «feel like it», it's unlikely that author is going to get a repeat sale.

Not exact matches

Because it was superseded by a New Testament that was put into effect by the death of its author.

The plain fact seems to be that both the Personhood of God and the doctrine of God's creation of heaven and earth were accepted by the authors of the New Testament with little question because they were already accepted in Judaism.

You said, «All confirmed by Hawking reply see: Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, The Grand Design (New York: Bantam Books, 2010), 161 — 62» In your reference, the authors write, «Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing.

New York officials from both parties criticized the tax plan, which was authored by congressional Republicans and signed by President Donald Trump, because of the potential impact on the state.

The new set - up differs from other types of thin - metal sensors currently in use, the authors note, because it detects molecules directly instead of measuring indirect changes caused by the presence of a chemical.

Lead author of the study Elizabeth Martin - Silverstone, a Palaeobiology PhD Student at the University of Southampton, said: «This new pterosaur is exciting because it suggests that small pterosaurs were present all the way until the end of the Cretaceous, and weren't outcompeted by birds.

«The ability to control the functional states of opioid receptors is of particular interest because they belong to the large family of so - called G - protein - coupled transmembrane receptors (GPCRs), which make up a large fraction of the proteins targeted by pharmaceutical agents,» says Matthias Schönberger, first author of the new study.

«Grocers can benefit from encouraging healthy shopping practices because they can sell more perishable items like fruits and vegetables rather than tossing them in the dumpster after a few days,» says lead researcher Brian Wansink, PhD, director of the Food and Brand Lab at Cornell University and author of the new book, Slim by Design: Mindless Eating Solutions for Everyday Life, «The benefit to shoppers is obvious; healthier groceries result in healthier eating!»

Because the results were self - reported, however, the authors can't say for sure how many symptoms were truly new (and likely caused by the surgery) and how many were a regression to patients» previous conditions.

It's a shame, because D Publishing could have been enthusiastically embraced by Australian authors and could have positioned Dymocks to grow into something like an Australasian Amazon, but I don't see how they are going to attract a lot of quality content with their new Publishing Agreement.

Because I am not restricted by a publication and distribution chain that only allows a certain number of books per month / year or by editorial policies that think readers only want a new book by an author once a year.

A lot of aspiring authors gravitate toward new agents because they think the odds of being accepted by a long - time and / or famous agent are more difficult than sending an unsolicited MS directly to a publisher.

I think the main reason is because they only stock physical books by new authors that the publisher is really hyping and perennial bestsellers by recognizable authors.

I know of one author whose publisher was told by a number of key accounts that they were not going to buy the author's newest book because the previous one had come out only three months earlier.

This is beneficial for authors because an editor will be able to see new changes input by the author before going to print.

I know readers say that now, that they would not try a new debut author at $ 2.99 but this is because there has been ebooks introduced at $ 0.99 in the first place by Amazon for years;) but if $ 2.99 was the absolute minimum available from the beginning readers would buy a book at that price because it would be considered the «entry price».

Because of the sudden surge in sales of Kindle devices and the iPad, within a New York Minute these authors sold hundreds of thousands of books... something previously believed could only be achieved by authors from New York publishing houses.

They want authors to write in a certain genre, for a specific market, because that's what's «selling» this month, e.g. shiny vampires; never mind that by the time the book is actually published (oh, about 12 - 18 months after the deal is signed), the new flavour of the month will be glowing werewolves.

Or at the least, they're getting the books by authors they already know, because they don't want to waste their trial taking a chance on something new.

The bottom line is that Amazon's eBook market is not yet big enough to cover the losses the top selling indie / self - pubbed authors lose out on by not being widely distributed in physical book stores in the U.S. Of course, this disadvantage is mitigated over time because once the trade publishers stop pushing their new releases, these books» sales typically decline, but indie / self - pubbed authors can keep their market pushes going indefinitely, and they can publish new books more frequently than once a year.

In this new world of publishing, disrupted by Amazon and the digital revolution, authors with small and moderate sellers like mine can still get their work out there and find readers because the Amazon algorithms are so damn good.

Because there's a higher risk of reader fatigue and sales degradation, traditional publishing is not always eager to embrace a book series by a new author.

The basic set up is this: a new e-book comes out and you buy it right away because you like the description or you've read other things by the author, etc..

The end result is less money in the pockets of the publisher and that means less money in the pockets of authors — and, since the traditional publishing industry lives and dies on Bookscan numbers, it means there may be some authors who will not get new contracts because their sales figures were hurt by this dispute.

For some unknown reason pocket articles are warning me about 7 unread «books» by certain author who I do not know because I didn't pay attention to a name of the author of article... I have no clue why the pocket articles now referred as books with the new software, it is confusing occasionally.

This will be interesting to watch because it comes out of a traditional publisher, includes well - regarded digital innovator Sarah Lloyd, plans to poach other publishers» authors, and looks set to play by the new digital rules rather than those of its corporate parent.

As a «new» author, who is considered dead in the water by the traditional publishing industry because of being chronologically «old», self / indie publishing is a no - brainer.

I love promoting my fellow Indelible authors because I know their work is great, they're forward - thinking Indie authors taking this new paradigm by storm, and they're my friends.

Because we're not a commercial site, we don't favor the newest books or books by best - selling authors.

Amazon has been good for all authors, best - selling and non, self - pub and partner pub, because, for a few, A) Amazon helped replace part of the wholesale market, which shrank in the 1990's, and really helped open up online book - selling; B) Amazon has increased international publishing by expanding into numerous countries, allowing more international authors to hit the big English markets, English authors to hit new markets and transnational publishers to do multi-country launches more easily; C) by launching the Kindle, Amazon juiced the small e-book retail industry into a much larger, fast - growing market, which helped replace mass market wholesale sales, etc..

These below are more inline with the later - day movements in social media, platform choices etc — many of which need to be considered by new writers considering the traditional publishing route also — because many traditional publishers now insist on seeing a growing author's platform before considering submissions.

I have sort of assumed the new terms / phrases / attitudes towards publishing and authors etc were engineered by and pushed by Amazon, because ultimately Amazon stands to benefit the most from these new shifts in attitudes.

In other words, if you want to read new books by Liane Moriarty, James Patterson, or John Grisham — the books from big - name authors released by big publishers — you will have to buy them separately because they are not included in Kindle Unlimited.

Actually, applying for a new credit card can ding your score by up to 5 points, says Beverly Harzog, a consumer credit expert and author of «The Debt Escape Plan,» because it results in a «hard inquiry» on your credit report.

During the Soviet period, the name Nizhniy Novgorod, which basically means «new city,» was replaced by the name «Gorky,» because of the famous — and overly didactic — Soviet author who spent his childhood there, Maxim Gorky.

Because we're not a commercial site, we don't favor the newest books or books by best - selling authors.

I reached out to Pierrehumbert because he is one of many authors of «Consequences of twenty - first - century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea - level change,» an important new Nature Climate Change analysis reinforcing past work showing a very, very, very long impact (tens of millenniums) on the Earth system — climatic, coastal and otherwise — from the carbon dioxide buildup driven by the conversion, in our lifetimes, of vast amounts of fossil fuels into useful energy.

If the author is already peddling denialism based on limited facts used out of context, and this new paper is published likely just to be used as the latest red herring distraction in the global warming argument by examining «Svalbard and Greenland temperature records» in a too limited time span without relevant context, which, just in case some may not have noticed does not represent the region known as planet Earth, uses too short a time span in relation to mechanism outside of the examined region because it is in fact a regional analysis; one is left with a reasonable conclusion that the paper is designed to be precisely what I suspect it is designed for, to be a red herring distraction in the argument between science and science denialism regarding global warming.

As Adam Cohen describes in this New York Times story, because the Internet disseminates material published in the United States worldwide, authors and journalists otherwise protected by the First Amendment are finding themselves dragged within the purview of the more restrictive libel laws on the books in other countries.

Because we're not a commercial site, we don't favor the newest books or books by best - selling authors.