Sentences with phrase «by accepting the science»

By accepting the science behind climate change as early as 2004, Lomborg presented himself as a climate moderate.

Not exact matches

Turns out, that there's at least one glaring example of outdated science that's still widely accepted by many entrepreneurs.

@sciper: ok so you're saying that faith, which requires no proof works well with science that requires not only proof, but is only accepted if challenged by peers and tested over and over again... sure they get along great.

One may or may not accept Thomas's metaphysical analysis, but at least one can see that the doctrine of creation, in its philosophical foundations, is not challenged by any discovery in the natural sciences.

By accepting unfalsifiable ideas, you're already admitting that scientific evidence doesn't matter to you because you've already forsaken the principle core of science, the need for ideas to be falsifiable.

And in accepting that inevitable FACT, proved by the findings of science, of the existence of that GREAT FIRST CAUSE, YOU HAVE ACCEPTED THE FACT of the existence and preexistence of the Creator - GOD!

Santa do you not understand science is accepted by me, its why i have faith.

If you've already read The Language of God, consider checking out A Fine - Tuned Universe by Alister McGrath, Coming to Peace With Science by Darrel Falk, Saving Darwin by Karl Giberson, or I Love Jesus and I Accept Evolution by Denis Lamoureux.

Modern, intelligent people are finally starting to reject the indoctrination from birth by society and are accepting science, logic, and reason instead of archaic myths.

3) True creationism has full respect for the unknown; science by itself is destined to explain everything away even if it is not bona - fide and complete (theory accepted as truth).

And Medical science — totally bankrupt, so many holes in it, so widely accepted by fools.

In science we have to accept that we only know what we know by evidence.

We all accept that love exists, although it can not be directly measured by science.

Predictably, she has been savaged by those in the GLBT community who rely on the «born gay» argument, supposedly supported by science, to justify sexual orientation being analogous to race and thus to be accepted and celebrated as a «given» of the human condition.

All the science has is hypothesis, not evidence, which are not proven or even provable, that's why they are not accepted by everyone.

On the other side are «creationists,» who argue — against not only science but also those faiths that accept the compatibility of evolutionary biology and Sacred Writ — that the earth was created on or around Sunday, October 23, 4004 b.c., a conclusion based on a sincere but discredited calculation by James Ussher in the seventeenth century.

People could either accept a world - view believed to have been vindicated by science or accept the fundamental assumption that people can make free, non-determined choices and are responsible for those choices.

Indeed, most cultures in human history have generated no such marvel as the modern scientific movement, and even in our own culture, scientifically oriented as it is supposed to be, most people accept the benefits of technology and use the vocabulary of science but do not in fact choose to abide by the disciplines that alone make scientific productivity possible.

Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result

The basic insight of the sociology of knowledge (my particular gate into the social sciences) is that, with the exception of an acute toothache, which can be experienced without support from others, we accept the reality that is taken as such by those around us.

For far from being a deviation from biblical truth, this setting of man over against the sum total of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality of things themselves, are posited in the very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).

Many who have come to accept history in this sense trace their conversion, first, to a breakdown of natural structure that began with Charles Darwin, was magnified by quantum physics, and is still unfolding in the philosophies of the sciences; and, second, to a breakdown of cultural structure that began with Friederich Nietzsche in Europe and William James in America, was magnified by the chaos and brutality of twentieth century politics and warfare, and is still unfolding in postmodern studies.

Best Analysis: Karl Giberson at The Huffington Post with «Why Evangelicals Are Fooled Into Accepting Pseudoscience» «The relentless assaults on the integrity of science by groups like the Discovery Institute have made it impossible for many people to understand the significance of a «scientific consensus.»

As usually presented, then, even by its more sophisticated spokesmen, classical theism requires acceptance of statements about the world, about its origin or end or the happenings within it, which men today are willing to accept, if at all, only with the backing and warrants of science or history.

Most educated people today, however, though aware that there is much we can not yet explain, are so conditioned by the world view of modern science that they find it hard to accept anything that runs counter to the normal processes of nature.

I have tried, fortified by the most generally accepted and solid conclusions of science, to take the reader above this scene of turmoil; and as we have risen higher so has the prospect acquired a more ordered shape.

After many years of confusion instilled by my religion, which is done I believe on purpose, I began to accept science instead of myth as fact.

The Church seemed to have accepted that the old arguments for the existence of God had been demolished by science, and it appeared that nobody had any new reasoned approaches to take.

We accept the facts as presented by science... facts that can be backed by peer reviewed studies.

For the popular picture of how things go in a scientific world, of the sort we have just been presenting, is no longer accepted by the leaders in science.

This I can not square away — however, I look at the gay issue much differently than most — I think it's much to complicated and we are jumping the gun by saying we just accept gay marriage — or it's an evil sin — what about the science that says testosterone starts forming around the babies brain when they are only 8 weeks into the womb?

The evolution of life on earth from simple matter is accepted as a fact by secular science.

ROGER: The evolution of life on earth from simple matter is accepted as a fact by secular science.

Saying «quantum» this and that, and using it as evidence for his hypothesis is only accepted by those who do n`t konw the science (including Chopra).

Another GOP wannabe pandering to the far right by supporting the concept that science not not be believed or accepted unless it conforms with your personal beliefs, and that all belief - based views of science are equally valid.

We (and science in general) start by accepting the real existence of certain scientific objects — atoms, electrons, gravitation, light, etc..

Charles Kingsley (1819 - 75), a clergyman whose theological competence has been obscured by his literary fame, was ready to accept the voice of science as the voice of God, and believed that the theologian was bound to be obedient to it.

Another GOP star pandering to the far right by supporting the concept that science need not be believed or accepted unless it conforms with your personal beliefs, and that all belief - based views of science are equally valid.

As shown by the Dover trial, creationists will use any underhanded, sneaky, backdoor attempt to get their religious views accepted as on par with science.

Many of the speakers, including many of the scientists, starting with the very opening paper by Cambridge palaeobiologist Simon Conway - Morris, were keen to emphasise above all that whilst accepting fully the rectitude of the science of the biological theory of evolution (mutation with natural selection), yet a «totality of explanation it is not» (Conway - Morris's words).

(Washington, D.C.) The Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) issued the following statement by Dr. Leon Bruner, GMA's chief science officer, regarding the decision by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to accept for review industry's food additive petition seeking approval for a specified set of low - level uses of partially hydrogenated oil (PHOs) in food products.

British Life Science Pvt Ltd apologized with a communication received from Mr. S. Mahendra Boopathy, Assistant manager of the company accepting the mistake committed by the company and informing that the stated advertisement has been withdrawn from publication in the future issues of Indian Journal of Pediatrics.He also assured that such violations would not happen henceforth.

If you accept the challenge, you can share what you did at a link party hosted by Science Sparks, The Imagination Tree, and Inspiration Laboratories.

There is a need for the understanding by all milk bank staff of the science behind determining whose breastmilk can be safely accepted but the above considerations also contribute to what may be considered the art of screening donors.

«We are delighted that Jon has accepted this position, which ensures that management of one of Mass Audubon's most mission - critical and identifiable programs will be overseen by a scientist of both impressive ability in the field and substantial research experience,» Director of Conservation Science Jeff Collins said.

By participating in the Contest, each entrant unconditionally accepts and agrees to comply with and abide by these Official Rules and the decisions of the American Association for the Advancement of Science («AAAS» or «Sponsor») which shall be final and binding in all respectBy participating in the Contest, each entrant unconditionally accepts and agrees to comply with and abide by these Official Rules and the decisions of the American Association for the Advancement of Science («AAAS» or «Sponsor») which shall be final and binding in all respectby these Official Rules and the decisions of the American Association for the Advancement of Science («AAAS» or «Sponsor») which shall be final and binding in all respects.

Those who know more about climate science, for example, are slightly more likely to accept that global warming is real and caused by humans than those who know less on the subject.

I was lucky enough to be accepted by Cardiff University for a postgraduate course in popular journalism, and even got a grant from the Association of British Science Writers and the Wellcome Trust.

In an interview with Science Careers following the announcement, Barolo says that PIBS will decide by next spring whether they will still accept GRE scores if applicants choose to send them in, and how they will handle them.

The accepted version is the version of the paper accepted for publication after changes resulting from peer review, but before editing by the Science Journal copyediting staff, image quality control, and production of the final PDF.