The latest book of the Bible was written around 90 AD
by an eyewitness of Jesus» ministry.
Not exact matches
In a sense,
by watching and sharing these photos and videos, we all become instant
eyewitnesses to the deaths
of these young black men — and to the often wide gulf between the «official» story
of what happened and the murky truth.
Russ Bauckham uses the Gospels themselves as internal evidence
of their own
eyewitness accounts but, if you're willing to accept the Gospels as trustworthy
by their own declaration and you're easily impressed
by the force
of the author's argument alone then it might be compelling.
«
By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which Christianity is supported, — that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible, do miracles become, — that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us, — that the Gospels can not be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events, — that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitness; — by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelatio
By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles
by which Christianity is supported, — that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible, do miracles become, — that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us, — that the Gospels can not be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events, — that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitness; — by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelatio
by which Christianity is supported, — that the more we know
of the fixed laws
of nature the more incredible, do miracles become, — that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible
by us, — that the Gospels can not be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events, — that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitness; — by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelatio
by us, — that the Gospels can not be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events, — that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies
of eyewitness; —
by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelatio
by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation.
Besides, much
eyewitness evidence is highly unreliable, as demonstrated
by the hundreds
of death row inmates who, in recent decades, they're convicted
by eyewitness testimony and later exonerated
by DNA analysis.
There's no avoiding the conclusion that Luke - Acts was written
by a traveling companion
of Paul who had the opportunity to interview
eyewitnesses to Jesus» life while in Jerusalem.
Two
of the Gospels were written
by eyewitnesses (John and Matthew).
The author summarizes the agreements among scholars about the New Testament texts and the problems they face in trying to recover the historical Jesus — the lack
of eyewitnesses and the fact that the Gospels were not written individually and probably not
by the authors to which they were traditionally ascribed.
So on that note, I'll close with this: Acts 17:10 - 12 written
by Luke, the same author
of the Gospel according to Luke, which was his own
eyewitness account
of the person
of Jesus Christ.
You're «hundreds»
of eyewitnesses were only recorded
by a few people.
It may be that none
of the gospels is written
by an
eyewitness.
Yet place all these miracle stories in the pre-scientific Roman Empire circa 1st century CE attested to
by copies
of copies
of copies
of discrepant manuscripts (written not
by eyewitnesses) and somehow they become valid?
The tomb where the disciples had laid the Lord's body found empty, along with the reports
of His appearances after His burial, especially at His ascension, are
eyewitness accounts and actual evidence for His resurrection given
by His devout followers.
«Because some scholars have treated miracle claims in the Gospels and Acts as purely legendary on the premise that such events do not happen, I intended to challenge their instinctive dismissal
of the possibility
of such claims
by referring to a few works that catalogued modern
eyewitness claims
of miracles.»
We're in a different genre here from that represented
by, say, the Gospel narratives
of Jesus» last days or the stories
of the reign
of King David in 2 Samuel, which read much more like
eyewitness history.
His account
of Jesus, passed on to him
by eyewitness disciples, were the first to be written down.
Many have undertaken to draw up an account
of the things that have been fulfilled [a] among us, 2 just as they were handed down to us
by those who from the first were
eyewitnesses and servants
of the word.
Many writers have undertaken to draw up an account
of the events that have happened among us, following the traditions handed down to us
by the original
eyewitnesses and servants
of the gospel.
Coupled with some
of the tools
of biblical criticism (such as the criteria
of Embarrassment, Double Discontinuity and Multiple Attestation), he seeks to demonstrate the case for the origin
of the Johannine tradition in the words and actions
of the historical Jesus, as passed on
by eyewitness accounts and possibly
by John the son
of Zebedee himself.
They claim that reports
of rebel barbarism are overblown (Laurent Dubois has said this repeatedly), although historian Jeremy Popkin has found that many
eyewitness accounts «are corroborated
by other documents.»
The
eyewitnesses of the Resurrection
of Jesus — those who ate, drank, spoke with, and listened to the Lord Jesus Christ after His Resurrection — were so convinced
of the Good News
of God's Love, Forgiveness, Peace, and Healing Power for all humanity revealed
by the Risen Jesus Christ that these
eyewitnesses were willing to die as martyrs for their belief in the Risen Christ as fully God and fully man when it was illegal to do so under Roman authority (where Cesar was considered a deity in the state cult religion).
The notion
of the
eyewitness is thus profoundly overthrown
by the dual theme
of Christ — a faithful witness — and
of testimony — testimony to the light.
Although the relation between two such actual occasions might help to explain how
eyewitnesses in Jesus» lifetime might have been able to relate to the quality
of life embodied
by him, it does not explain how we in our era are to bridge all
of what has come to separate us from him.
Chad Speaking
of eyewitnesses, who was
eyewitness to this temptation
of Jesus
by Satan?
Carefully itemizing mercantile bills
of sale, inventories
of militia and volunteer detachments, the evidence that there was a lack
of gun - smiths, records
of importation
of guns from Europe, the incidence
of duels (three in the entire South in the 1760s, none fatal), children's books and toys, comments
by eyewitnesses about the abysmal shooting ability
of settlers (lacking both the weapons and the gunpowder to practice), court records, and a wide variety
of other historiographical resources, the author assembles an overwhelming mass
of data to show that military prowess was not, in fact, characteristic
of early Americans.
The second half
of the lecture goes on to make the case for the authentic historicity — the truth —
of the Gospels as reports
by or
of eyewitness testimony to the ministry
of Jesus.
And yet none
of the signs were really «unmistakable,» It is possible to read the record and to remain, as many
eyewitnesses were, quite unmoved
by it.
The books were written
by eyewitnesses during the lives
of other
eyewitnesses... meaning if an author wrote something untrue, the other
eyewitnesses would have called them on it.
Luke 1:1 Many have undertaken to draw up an account
of the things that have been fulfilleda among us, 2just as they were handed down to us
by those who from the first were
eyewitnesses and servants
of the word.
And yet, the victim - survivor is the only reliable «expert» and
eyewitness to whom to turn and,
by the very fact
of having survived, is also morally obligated to provide information.
But there are also inaccuracies
of detail and description, and it is therefore better to conclude that though some
eyewitness material lies behind this gospel (perhaps from John himself), the final writing and compilation were done
by one who was not a participant in the events described.
Luke 1 Introduction 1 Many have undertaken to draw up an account
of the things that have been fulfilled [a] among us, 2 just as they were handed down to us
by those who from the first were ****
eyewitnesses ***** and servants
of the word.
Referring to a statement as true might be considered meaningful in the case
of empirically proven hypothesis, or
of formal statements in some symbolic logic, but never regarding ad - hoc metaphysical propositions given to you
by an old «holy» book,
eyewitness accounts or personal anecdotes.
Thirteen men living in the early nineteenth century signed legal affidavits, swearing under oath, that they personally had seen the Golden Tablets delivered to Joseph Smith
by the angel Moroni with their own two eyes, and three
of these men signed affidavits that they had seen the angel Moroni himself with their own two eyes... but yet no Christian believes this
eyewitness testimony.
mama k Chad seems to think that a story that mentions «
eyewitnesses» is as solid a piece
of evidence as an affidavit
by an
eyewitness who remains available for further questioning.
In the absence
of historical evidence to the contrary, our views are formed
by the clear tradition
of near contemporary accounts, preserved that our faith might be well founded on
eyewitness testimonies within the Tradition
of the Church.
The last
of these visits is thus described
by Wagniere, who was an
eyewitness to the scene.
In a word, there may have been differences
of opinion among the early Christians as to just who the apostles were; but there are many indications that from the very beginning the term designated a special and restricted class —
eyewitnesses of the event itself, commissioned as his ambassadors
by Jesus Christ in a unique sense.
But in a statement yesterday, the FA said: «Following a review
of the evidence provided
by the clubs and independent
eyewitnesses, the FA will be taking no formal action.»
Speaking on
Eyewitness News on Thursday, Mr Amese said the re-branding
of the 116 buses could have cost only GHc928, 000 instead
of the GHc3, 649,044 paid
by government to the Smarttys Management and Production.
Largely adopting provisions in a bill drafted in 2015
by the State Bar Association in collaboration with the Innocence Project and the District Attorneys» Association
of New York, the budget agreement calls for both video recording
of custodial interrogations
of suspects in serious crimes and reforming procedures for
eyewitness identification.
An
eyewitness told TV3 that four heavily armed robbers successfully robbed a wholesale shop full
of provisions owned
by one Alhaji Muntari.
We have open - source
eyewitness reports
of the attack coming from barrel bombs dropped
by helicopters, which is not a tactic opposition groups have used but does correlate precisely with how the Syrian regime conducted previous actions
of this sort.
Eyewitnesses told Citi News that during the confrontation, a gun brought out
by one
of the Chinese was seized
by the two Ghanaians but a second gun was reportedly fired
by the Chinese, killing the witness, Nana Boamah instantly.
The pioneer
of private radio stations in Ghana, Dr. Charles Wereko - Brobbey, in an interview on
Eyewitness News also rejected the claims
by the President saying the his message were instead being blocked
by some arrogant government communicators who waste media space allotted to them
by generating unnecessary arguments.
An
eyewitness, Mr. Abuchi Okwara, told our correspondent that the JSS2 student whose name was given as Chinyere was sent out
of the school
by the school's authorities over non-payment
of school fees.
He further told host
of Eyewitness News» Richard Dela Sky that his government did no wrong
by signing new contracts.
Bernard, on behalf
of my other frustrated UHAS landowners, I sincerely appreciate your station's efforts in bringing our plight on your programs from the beginning and further appeal once again to your outfit to help us
by means
of your programs either on the Citi Breakfast Show,
Eyewitness News or any other platform to help get what is due us from the state.
This point was succinctly made
by the Eastern Regional Minister, Eric Kwakye Daffour when he said on Citi FM
Eyewitness News
of November 3, 2017 that: «You and I, when we buy cattle to rear, we won't ask our children or kinsmen to take care
of them.
«This is a deliberate attempt
by Charlotte Osei and the EC to disqualify us... they should clap for themselves for tarnishing the image
of our multiparty democracy in the country, and deliberately running into the pockets
of the government
of the day and trying to please their pay masters,» Mr Bempah told Richard Sky on
Eyewitness News.