Sentences with phrase «by anything anyone»

Think about it — not one single part of that story is confirmed by anything anyone has seen or touched.

Beating women is not a religious more, and it's certainly not applauded by any form of Judaism... so, no, that scenario is not supported by anything anyone has said.

Not exact matches

I wouldn't pay $ 22 for the best ebook in the world — and obviously no one else will either, if my sales reports are anything to go by (and yes, although Sex, Bombs and Burgers is a veritable thrill ride, it probably isn't the best ebook in the world in anyone's mind besides my own).

These new entrants would need to get a licensing agreement from Myriad for anything they discovered related to the BRCA genes, which would effectively shut down future work by anyone other than Myriad in this area.

But if the company is going to start removing accounts belonging to anyone who says anything remotely offensive, it is going to be spending all of its time doing that, and by doing so it is probably going to alienate as many users as to which it appeals.

Unlike oil, gold or corn, with digital currencies, there's no «there» there — no physical stuff, or even made - up stuff backed by anyone or anything.

Every one of the VCs who apologized has said they had no idea that they'd done anything wrong, or made anyone uncomfortable by their actions.

We respect the question asked by Madison Mayor Paul Soglin: «If WEDC failed to contact Oscar Mayer in the critical months of July and August of this summer, why would anyone think there is anything productive to be gotten out of WEDC?»

So, banks, shadow banks, and anyone else of systemic importance, I implore you: for the good of everyone, by which I mean for the good of the human species, keep this garbage, and anything connected to it, the hell off of your balance sheets.

He says, «Nobody learned anything by hearing themselves talk, or speak,» and he goes on to say, «The ability to lock in and listen is a skill that has served me well in life,» says Branson, «Although, it seems to be a dying art, I believe that listening is one of the most important skills for any teacher, parent, leader, entrepreneur, or just about anyone who has a pulse.»

By what conceivable right can anyone demand that a human being exist for anything but for his own joy?

I don't understand why anyone would be offended by someone praying for the souls of their dead ancestors, whatever religion you happen to be, if you don't believe in God it isn't like it hurts anything, if you beleive in a different God, again it isn't like it hurts anything...

Now... if you'd like to discuss the nature of an omnipotent being who finds it necessary to coerce bows out of his own creations, and whether or not such a being deserves to be worshipped by anyone or anything, we can certainly discuss that.

The story of a resuurection is not proof of anything, as the story you've been told since birth was NOT recorded by anyone who was there, rather it was FINALLY written down 2 generations after the so - called «fact».

Anyone who does anything out of the norm, but is themselves is looked down on and ridiculed by most, like you just did.

You try to play on the people will convince themselves» thing by stating a bunch of theories, which are not anyone convincing anyone of anything, they all are theoretical, postulates.

I'm sorry if that was a breach of your trust, but at the time I genuinely thought it was the best way to serve you — by not hiding anything I knew from anyone who asked.

there is no need to judge anyone of anything, seeing christians aren't allowed to judge; so thus by telling anyone that doesn't follow your idea of the correct way to live that they «are going to need to get right with god» or the ever so famous» you're going to burn in hell» speeches you are thus breaking one of «gods»» commands and all sin is equal in his eyes so we'll be seeing you in hell.

I began to answer these questions in a post about the existence of God by looking at the basic approach I use when answering questions from atheists (or anyone with whom I disagree about anything).

There are no eternal consequences to anything that anyone ever does, so Catholicism is just unfounded beliefs and rituals practiced by people who are comforted by such things.

I stopped by to say I'm leaving the conversation for a reason that concerns me, not anything or anyone else.

I will conclude by saying that on the atheistic there is no objective morality anyways so I don't believe that the atheist has any grounds for accusing God or anyone else for that matter if doing anything evil or wrong.

Everyone is now somehow accountable, but few (if any) religious are called to accountability by anyone for anything.

You do know that by your definition of proof, anyone can be convinced to believe in anything just cause it makes them feel good (you could now be worshiping LSD if that is what you tested and wanted to have faith in)

Sad when it comes to the Body of Christ because we really shouln't feel threatened by anyone or anything, especially other children of God.

Two fold, firstly, you've helped another person live for a little longer by protecting them from the cold, but for you personally that didn't get anything out of it you could look at it from another perspective, anyone could have seen you and acknowledged you benevolence either by saying something or just thinking how nice it was you did that and then maybe also passing along an act of kindness.

You are not the one that is heaping anything on anyone they are really doing it to themselves by persisting in their hatred but even more so when they hate those who love them in truth.

What one culture assigns labels that we translate as «good» and «bad» is pretty obviously something assigned by the culture so we aren't saying anything anyone disagrees with.

Can you think of anything much finer that could be said of anyone than was said of St. Francis Xavier by a companion on one of his terrific missionary journeys?

Please don't listen to these people on here they have so many different views and ideas of their own but don't listen to them they have closed their heart to God and are doing Satans work of misleading people away from the Almighty they look for men who like to have their ears tickled so don't take mine our anyone else's word for it look it up for your self history attests to the bible as true and The writings of Moses is far older than anything they have ever found thats right Moses wrote the first parts in the bible 3,500 years ago The scriptures weren't inspired by Pagan stories Pagan stories was inspired by actual events just like those in the bible because if you notice that a lot of the stories found in the bible have a lot to do about people worshipping false Gods.

Sorry, but the idea that atheists (which is not capitalized, btw) are trying to tell anyone to believe anything by protesting this is patently absurd.

God has never required, recognized, or accepted any sacrifice by anyone for anything.

and Mormons went against the bible; By writing a «new book» when it clearly states in the bible: «If anyone is to add to this book, he will be added to the plagues described in the book, and if anyone takes anything out, he will have his share of the tree of life taken away.»

Please do not dangerously deceive anyone by teaching them anything less.

More broadly, they've proven Greenberg and company's original terror management theory right all along: that people deal with death by upholding worldviews that are larger and longer - lasting than themselves, and opposing anyone or anything that violates these «cultural anxiety - buffers.»

@Chad «I have never seen anyone successfully argue that Hitlers actions were anything other than motivated by german nationalism, however, I do think horrendous theology in Christianity over the centuries has contributed a great deal to anti-semitism, so I do think we as Christians have an ownership of a great deal of the holocaust and I wont shy away from that.

Often it appears in symposia about the relative incapacity of anyone to say much of anything with security about God, since everything we can say is a perspectival construal conditioned decisively by the sociohistorical situation from which one comes — a view that, oddly, always seems to be coupled with a plea to discuss the matter a lot more.

But you know, as she said herself — and it's what I believe — anything that is written by anyone, you must compare it to the Word of God and if there's any inconsistency, you must reject it.

We as Christians should not be outraged by this stance of the gays, because we know the devil will use anyone and anything he can to bring down the Christians and the values true to the bible.

Just by reading the comments being posted, it shows anyone can make accusations about anything.

They have to say it's not the same God otherwise people will start asking why God wants different people to follow different rules, the truth of the matter is Christians don't want to live by rules, they want to live by grace, they don't want anyone to tell them not to eat or drink too much or to do anything anyone else says.

Anyone who suggests anything else is dismissed by many leading biologists, such as Monod and Luria, as a Lamarckist if not a Lysenkoist.

I have assumed by much of what you have written over the last few months, that because you seem so distressed with the North America church systems, as a whole, and how they / we treat the «unlovely» [please, don't anyone misunderstand that phrase], are legalistic, and are trying to make clones that you were an «anything goes» man.

Then, just as they start stuttering and stammering through some half - @ $ $ attempt to pretend they understand their own bss - ackward behavior, ask them why anyone who believes in SELF - RELIANCE and pulling yourself up by your bootstraps would worship anyone or anything... AT ALL.

How does that logically necessitate that I am easily led by anyone or anything?

Yes, Jesus a Liberal... and Ken you are a frightened human being... let it go... I'm not pushing anything on anyone... Christ loves everyone... man was made in God's image so deal with it... and me2 you and I both know it was the conservatives who wanted slavery... Abe Lincoln would be sickened by what has happened to his party... he was a man who stood on principle and believed in good for the common man... way different than the party you are tied to... Price... I agree with you in that there are many good Christians... unfortunately, there are many who are very ignorant and use Christ / God as a convenient excuse to denounce what they don't accept...

But I don't think anything is accomplished by mocking people's beliefs when they're not hurting anyone as is clearly the case here.

After the pattern set by Isaiah, Jesus, Joel, and Pentecost, the burden of proof is on anyone who claims that Luke means anything other than foreign languages.

I am going to weigh in, being a catholic and the whole shabang... First of all this is not infringing on anyone's right to practice their religion... Requiring insurance companies to provide contraception for women does not mean the woman has to use it or purchase it... Catholic hospitals take federal funds for their patients, therefore they are not exempt from employment laws... If the Catholic Diocese doesn't want to provide the insurance claiming religious beliefs, then they can no longer accept federal funded patients... They also know that they will be subjected to discrimination lawsuits based hiring and religious discrimination — non-catholics work there, and therefore are being denied healthcare due to catholic beliefs... Majority if not all Catholic women do, have, or had used contraception in their lifetime... God does not nor does the bible say anything about contraception, since it had not been invented yet — so this is a man - made law, made by a bunch of men, who have never had a menstrual cycle — and the pain that comes with it....

(Isa 8:20 NIV)» this verse is the bases for Bible interpretation,,, it identifies the guidelines,,, in other words,,, the Bible can't contradict itself,,, nor can anyone who claims to be bearing the message of God contradict with the Bible,,, so if the Bible tells me that (Soddom and Gomorrah had sinned,,, and in many other parts of the Bible Perversion is called by its name) then what King David says here needs to be understood in a figurative way,,, here is a suggestion,,, a Man lets down his defenses infront of his wife,,, he is absolutely offguard around her,,, his love towards his wife, is a mixture of love, respect, endless trust,,, and this kind of love was what David had towards Jonathan,,, he knew he could count on him, he knew, he didn't have to fear anything around him, he knew,,, «as the verse states» that he loved him as himself!