Sentences with phrase «by asking questions such»

Retailers can help by asking questions such as: Does your bird like to chew, tear, preen, shadow box, snuggle with or disassemble toys?
You can start by asking questions such as:
In the same way that we coach pupils by asking questions such as «what information is given in the problem?»
Cahill concluded her remarks by reiterating that youth development is not a program, but a lens — and this lens needs to be driven into the federal conversation by asking questions such as: «What will this mean for a young person if we do this?»
It is also possible to exploit the text orally with the pupils by asking questions such as «fully describe Anna's father» or «how are the cats?»
But by asking questions such as «why are animals altruistic?»
Then test her comprehension by asking her questions such as «What did Franklin do in his room?»
Try to guess the number by asking questions such as, «Is it greater than 50?»
As your child gets more adept at understanding feeling labels, encourage perspective taking by asking questions such as «How is she feeling?»
The simple process of checking out meanings by asking questions such as, «Do I hear you correctly?»
For example, you don't want to be too direct or aggressive by asking questions such as, «Do you have a budget for this purchase?»
By asking questions such as «What is your least favorite part of your day and why?»
The teacher then encourages individuals / groups to take a balcony view by asking a question such as «What are you noticing about your learning?»

Not exact matches

Especially with matters of business, I'm never afraid that people won't want to talk back to me about what they're up to, or that I might offend them by asking such questions.
Weirdly, I get asked all sorts of specific, technical questions by prospects, such as, «How do I improve my SEO?»
By asking two such simple questions, a manager can discover how best to motivate his employees, persuade his customers, and support its shareholders.
Hosting a Twitter chat that is focused on a topic important to your industry, such as ProfNet's #ConnectChat, allows you to associate your brand with an industry thought leader while giving your audience access to that thought leader by asking questions.
As such, they sustain this critical skillset, not just by asking more questions, but by identifying the «hot» questions — ones that are provocative, emotional and downright uncomfortable — while also encouraging those around them to be passionate about the same.
Ask questions such as, does he respect your time by being punctual?
The process begins by asking a few questions, such as what is the «greater good» the business is trying to achieve?
Under English law, which often applies to such policies involving international trade, because insurance contracts are «of the utmost good faith», the policyholder is required to disclose all «material» facts to the insurance company even if no question is asked by the insurance company.
Using Twitter search or Twitter management tools like HootSuite, you can perform searches for people asking questions about a particular topic by searching for queries such as «content marketing.»
Why single out gays and ask unanswerable questions on a day that should be celebrated instead of one darkened by such trash.
He tells the story of a conference he was at where he asked a Catholic priest what Jesus meant by «unless you hate your mother and father you can not be my disciple» and the priest waffled and said he wasn't prepared to answer such a difficult question.
-- test the picture by a survey instrument (such as the one described next) that asks similar questions, and by inviting members of the congregation to review and comment on the results of your observations.
Now leaving the Church out of account for the moment, such a future society will be faced with the question how it can ask all its members to subscribe to such an ethos without replacing (or at least endangering) the freedom of the individual by an enforced ideology and indoctrination.
The Protestant churches would do well to encourage the use of some such series of questions for self - examination before God; but the questions need genuinely to be asked by and about the individual for himself.
The only answer to such a question is that of the Greek philosopher, who, when asked about God by an idler, kept a persistent silence.
As with other fields of sociological research the question has been asked if there is good enough reason to treat socioreligious phenomena separately instead of handling them in the traditional disciplines (theology, philosophy, anthropology, etcetera).30 Yet, as against such doubts, the work done by modern scholarship has proved the right to an independent existence of «sociology of religion.»
13 It was quite in character for Jesus to meet such a question by asking another.
The teacher's approach to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how science fits into the larger framework of life, and the student should raise questions about the meaning of what he studies and its relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity of the student by avoiding undue imposition of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not to exist.
A couple may find it helpful to ask themselves questions such as these: Is this really an issue worth fighting over or is my self - esteem threatened by something my spouse has said or done?
Moved by these concerns, in awareness of such needs, pastors and teachers of theology, administrators and boards of theological seminaries and now groups of these gathered loosely around a staff of inquirers with their advisers have undertaken for a brief space of time to examine their work and to ask large and small questions about its adequacy and improvement.
Indeed, even if one begins with broadly epistemological considerations, as I have done here, one can only avoid asking and answering the question wherein the ontic correlate of such a noetic pole consists by a failure to be fully critical in taking account of what one always already presupposes.
She proceeds to ask similar questions about the billions that corporations like General Motors and IBM will save over a period of years by investment credit and such wonders as «asset depreciation range.»
We're told to just trust, but when we feel like our trust has been violated by those who deliver the message, it's no longer that easy, and we have questions to ask that have no easy answers (or do have easy answers but the people we ask have rather violent reactions towards such questions).
Socrates says that when he was a young man he had a consuming interest in natural science, always seeking into the causes of things, and asking such questions as whether organic growth is due to fermentation caused by variations of temperature, and whether thought and memory can be explained in terms of the brain.
People who ask such questions have not been liberated from the concept of God as omnipotent dictator of the universe, responsible for everything that happens and who, if he willed, could change the course of events by sheer fiat.
but he does not approach ethical inquiry from the perspective of the individual faced by such choices and asking the ethical question: «What ought I to do?»
This is especially true when such questions are being asked by those who are suffering, those whose lives are significantly impacted by the answers.
True, it tends to ask rather different questions, such as those concerning the understanding of existence implicit in Jesus» teaching, but its work is still based on exactly the same kind of historical - critical methodology as that used by Bultmann or Jeremias.
However, if this is correct, surely such a plan would have been put into place before the start of the new season, and questions will justly be asked of this decision by Mourinho, which comes just days after his public criticism.
Whilst it is never wise to jump to conclusions you have to ask yourself why would Arsene say such things or more importantly why would he place himself in a situation by even bothering to answer these kind of leading questions?
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Because the Maddocks questions can be asked by anyone, they are valuable on sports sidelines where no health care professional trained in performing a full sideline screening for concussion, such as doctor or certified athletic trainer, is present, as is often the case in contact and collision sports involving younger athletes.
This app also has a variety of other features, such as baby's week by week development, what body changes you can expect each week, questions to ask at your doctors visits, etc..
You can prepare for your child's 12 - month checkup by anticipating some of the questions the doctor is likely to ask, such as these:
For example, the book is filled with funny costumes worn by the dancing animals — ask your child questions about the animals and point out different parts of the silly costumes, like the line - dancing ants wearing hats and boots, such as:
If you find your child's teacher is the one focusing too much on grades and academics, try asking questions that address the parts of your child that can't be measured by test scores and homework, such as character and friendships.
And of course, such a discourse should be moderated by someone that knows how to ask the right questions, the right follow ups, and wont let anyone off the hook.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z