Sentences with phrase «by at least thinking»

Head this problem off at the pass by at least thinking in advance of a moment that you can share about your day.

Not exact matches

Gross domestic product probably will expand by at least three percent this year, something that some economists thought our aging and relatively unproductive economy might never do again.

While he would have liked to have seen more investor - specific changes — «it's always nice to have more rather than less,» he says — he thinks it's unlikely we'll see any reductions in capital gain taxes or major increases in TFSA room until at least 2015, when the government says it can balance the budget by.

At the ery least, doing business requires a degree of mutual respect, embodied in our commitment to getting things from others by offering them what we think they want in return.

'' [Apple COO] Jeff [Williams] has asked me to lead the thinking (or at least the conversation) on the intersection of the regulatory landscape (as it currently exists and where we hope we might be able to influence its movement) and our products and platforms,» Robin Goldstein, a special projects attorney for Apple, said in an email seen by MobiHealthNews.

At least that's the thought behind OK Go music video «The Writings on The Wall,» which was produced by 1stAveMachine, a studio in New York City.

At least that's the thinking at Microsoft, where hundreds of job seekers have been asked the bathroom question as part of the legendary «interview loop» — a rigorous ritual in which candidates are grilled by their future colleagues with a barrage of puzzles, riddles, and bizarre hypothetical questionAt least that's the thinking at Microsoft, where hundreds of job seekers have been asked the bathroom question as part of the legendary «interview loop» — a rigorous ritual in which candidates are grilled by their future colleagues with a barrage of puzzles, riddles, and bizarre hypothetical questionat Microsoft, where hundreds of job seekers have been asked the bathroom question as part of the legendary «interview loop» — a rigorous ritual in which candidates are grilled by their future colleagues with a barrage of puzzles, riddles, and bizarre hypothetical questions.

After reading and thinking about all of this, I stand by my (relatively) broad definition of an entrepreneur — namely, that anyone who takes on the risk of working for him or herself is (at least one type of) an entrepreneur.

That's why, ultimately, I can't really blame Jana Partners for pushing for a break - up... Qualcomm's licenses by themselves would be a money gusher, at least for a few years, and while I think most investors are more long - term oriented than people think, I can absolutely understand the temptation — and associated price premium — associated with money in hand now.

I laugh and sometime sneer at those who think new Fed Head Jerome Powell will impose monetary discipline by raising interest rates at least up to the real rate of inflation and reduce the Fed's balance sheet according the schedule as laid out by Yellen.

If you are at least 50 years old (or will be by December 31), think about making an additional $ 5,500 catch - up contribution in 2011.

A survey conducted by Realtor.com found that many home buyers think they have to put down at least 20 % when buying a house.

Given this, how long do you think it will be before anchor text is no longer a useful signal to the engines, at least not by itself?

As you can probably tell, I think investing in a restaurant opened by two friends belongs in the «too hard» pile at the very least.

«The answer may be entirely innocent,» Mr. Denton said, musing on the question of whether Mr. Harder was paid by someone other than Mr. Hogan, «but I think in order for people to understand what's going on here, what the stakes are, I think it's important that it be out in public, or at least that he'd be asked the question in public.»

If the thought of participating in all of the downside of the market is unnerving to you, then you may be better served by investing in an actively managed fund that has at least the potential to limit the downside (although this is no guarantee).

But I don't think they disprove the EMH, especially not over what I know you concede is a very short period of relatively bullish market, least of all by looking at them in price (versus NAV) terms.

It looks like we're in for a hard landing, so I think the Fed will lower rates by at least half a point in January.

Or, at least, these are stances, thoughts, and ideas that these people should be embarrassed by.

It's not one book like I always thought - It's an ancient collection of writings, comprised of 66 separate books, written over approximately 1,600 years, by at least 40 distinct authors.

I do admit that McCain is a very good man though and I would have trusted him to at least do the right things on most accounts except he tends to be a Neo-con which I think Amnerica has no place pushing Democracy (or anything for that matter) by military force.

I went to a small town in the midwest to work for a non-profit thinking it'd be like chicken - soup - for the soul... INSTEAD it was a fundamentalist nightmare... it was NOT just small town mindedness... I could hardly find a church with out people wondering — why is this attractive woman in her early 30's unwed (or at least divorced with 3 kids) people were cold and unfathomable judgmental and sometimes downright hostile eager to quote scriptures seemingly un-lead by the Holy Spirit.

I think at some point the defensiveness becomes just as bad or even worse than the initial injury, and we have to admit that there is at the very least a callous disregard and contempt for the injured by the leaders of the organization.

Overwhelmed by the failure, Bill had one «comforting» thought: «With a fifth of gin, I could be a millionaire — at least for a while.»

One might find at least a tiny echo of this inadequate notion of reform in his initial impulse to rebuild Christ's Church by attending to ecclesiastical masonry — an episode in the early steps of his pilgrimage toward Christ that makes me think of present - day temptations to live the New Evangelization by getting top - drawer management consultants to advise the Church on messaging.

They will not be broadcast by PBS any time soon, however, for, whatever one thinks of their theology, they make cognitive claims that are at least worth arguing about.

compared to the old there seems to be a whole different god or that god has changed i think i am going to trust studies — at least they state the margin of error, the religious stand by the bible as fact, the word of god... it would seem your god is a moron who can't keep his story straight.

Now that millions of people around the world are armed with cell phone cameras, you'd think we would get at least one picture of the tooth fairy, a unicorn, a UFO, or an angel by now.

I love Jesus, or at least I thought I did, but these past few years have been plagued by a crippling depression.

As a matter of fact it is obvious that at least in some instances — one need think only of the Gospel of John — the kerygma was put into the mouth of Jesus by the evangelists.

Sure, some Christians «think for themselves» but, at least in some small degree, they rely on poems and fairy tales and, critically, what they are told by others are the «rules», to guide their behavior.

This may be partly because the moderns had some success in undermining confidence in the classic proofs by their criticism without winning any lasting confidence in their own, but the main cause is not any defect in the proofs for the existence of God, at least in the classic proofs, but the general discredit which has fallen upon all systems of thought which ante-date the last century.

No, coptic christians will not be remembered at all for this - years and years will go by where they think it was an «israeli jew» lmao - damage already done by cnn and other media outlets like the wall street journal - nice work guys - at least this will start more suicide bombings and beheadings that will give you more headlines and idiots like me to post comments --

Once upon a time, I thought that the Christian faith, or at least the purest version of it, had started with Jesus and his disciples, taken a hiatus for about a thousand years during the reign of Roman Catholicism, returned with Martin Luther and the Protestant Reformation, and gotten properly explained again by the 1895 Bible Conference of Conservative Protestants.

I think that whatever they did in their meetings were a by product of living out the gospel or at least endevoring to live it out.

There is much truth in the saying, at least if we think of the self as a self - enclosed substance isolated within the body and cut off from the world by the boundaries of the skin.

Pixley charges Whitehead's thought with three things: (1) that it is «at the very least... open to appropriation for counterrevolutionary purposes;» (2) that «Justice shines by its absence» from Whitehead's list of five cultural aims as the measure of civilized life; and (3) that Whitehead's philosophy contains within it latent counterrevolutionary tendencies.»

the media, gov» t, retail, etc... Manipulation is also used a lot by people who belive in something and when they think other people should believe in the same thing... We've all been guilty of this... at least I have anyways... keep on rocking the boat Dave!

In short, I think humans ruin things by their nature, and they even ruin things that are meant to (or at least have the potential to) save them.

Milic Capek, eminent disciple of Bergson, supports my contention that indeterminism is the sine qua non of process metaphysics, or at least is thought to be so by the most able and inspiring process thinkers.

You would think by now evolution would've allowed it to walk, talk, or at least stay away from my fly swatter.

If Heidegger's project was never intended to build a conception of God, and certainly it was not, it at least establishes the philosophical justification for thinking that we, as authentic human beings, have at our disposal the means by which to do so.

To begin with, I think we must admit that when Whitehead speaks of the subject being constituted of its objects and the cause passing into the effect, he means, at least in part, that the objects / causes are reproduced by way of likeness insofar as the subject / effect assumes the same forms.

And Whitehead says that he does not think it is inevitable that the human mind spatializes, though it often does this, and when it does, one way or another, whether through partiality or something else, it deforms the object of knowledge and of experience... [But] Bergson believed that, at least to some significant degree, the spatializing tendencies of the human intellect and of human intelligence, can be overcome by a biology and a physics that is less mechanistic.

Because, at least in part, they think of personality as objective, they hope to safeguard God's personality, or His personal relations with man, by limiting His nature to the personal alone.

The economists whose thought was shaped by the industrial revolution argue that there are no limits or, at least, that any limits there may be are so remote as to be irrelevant.

At the same time, Stove maintains that «Darwinism says many things, especially about our species, which are too obviously false to be believed by an educated person; or at least by an educated person who retains any capacity at all for critical thought.&raquAt the same time, Stove maintains that «Darwinism says many things, especially about our species, which are too obviously false to be believed by an educated person; or at least by an educated person who retains any capacity at all for critical thought.&raquat least by an educated person who retains any capacity at all for critical thought.&raquat all for critical thought.»

It should not be surprising then that Whitehead thought of God as a single actual entity immune to the possibility of loss.59 At least William Christian sees this as the proper Whiteheadian view.60 Nevertheless, Christian's position is challenged by Ivor Leclerc, who argues, in agreement with Hartshorne, that Christian's conclusion is incompatible with the categoreal scheme elaborated in chapter two of Process and Reality.61 Here, according to Leclerc, Whitehead «makes clear» that the category of «subjective perishing» is «necessarily applicable to every actual entity whatever, including God.»

He should have been immediately backed up by a rapid response unit, ready at all times to react to such criticisms with the facts, who could (in my dreams) have quickly established that what the Pope said was absolutely consistent with current thinking among at least some respected secular authorities.

Nevertheless, I think that my analysis is at least suggested by some of the claims that Whitehead does make about the process of concrescence and that it is consistent with all of the claims that he makes about concrescence.