I had Christian friends who didn't think I should read books
by atheists like Dawkins, etc..
So religion caused more deaths than the purges
by atheists like Stalin or Mao?
«We atheists»... most atheists are embarrassed
by atheists like you.
Not exact matches
Atheists: I know many there are many people that practice religion just
by fanaticism, I've seen many people in my opinion stupid (excuse the word) praying to saints hopping to solve their problems
by repeating pre-made sentences over and over, but there are others different, I don't think Religion and Science need to be opposites, I believe in God, I'm Catholic and I have many reasons to believe in him, I don't think however that we should pray instead of looking for the cause and applying a solution,
Atheists think they are smart because they focus on Science and technology instead of putting their faith in a God, I don't think God will solve our problems, i think he gave us the means to solve them
by ourselves that's were God is, also I think that God created everything but not as a Magical thing but stablishing certain rules
like Physics and Quimics etc. he's not an idiot and he knew how to make it so everything was on balance, he's the Scientist of Scientist the Mathematic of Mathematics, the Physician of Physicians, from the tiny little fact that a mosquito, an insect species needs to feed from blood from a completely different species, who created the mosquitos that way?
When talented
atheists die (
like Christopher Hitchens), millions of us touched
by his wit and intellect remember him warmly.
Atheists by and large do not want atheism legislated or running government, we would
like people to use reason to come to their conclusions not force.
The New
Atheists seem equally easily led
by Dawkins, Hitchens, and the
like.
Perhaps, because
like «
atheist» it is a term claimed
by a large group of people who also hold ideas I don't agree with.
The only
atheists I don't
like are those that are offended
by my very existence.
You speak from ignorance and obviously know nothing about
atheists - though you're probably surrounded
by them without even knowing it because they don't feel
like battling with the ignorant.
I'm not going to go so far as to say that her boyfriend converted her,
like many people on here have... I understand it, as an agnostic and not an
atheist... There is a human need that is filled
by religion that is hard to be met elsewhere.
According to the work produced
by David B. Barrett's religious statistics organisation (FYI, the man was a Christian no less)
atheists number more than Jews, Sikh's, Shintos, Baha'is, Jains, combined, and if you want to consider all «non - religious / secular / agnostic /
atheist» together, since the whole «non-religion» movement is kinda riddled with people who find conontations of words
like «
atheist» to be bad enough to not want to declare themselves
atheist, you'll find the number of that non-religious group also amounts more than those religions plus buddhism, and taoism or even Confucianism.
For
atheists like me, it's always funny how worked up ignorant people get over a book, written
by people trying to profit from, control and manipulate people in the 4th century AD.
I'll tell you what: how about you stop acting
like those
atheists (who do not represent all
atheists,
by the way), and desist in painting an entire body of belief (or lack thereof) based on the actions of its most militant and aggressive members?
@Jason People
like you are why
Atheists aren't
liked by the general populace.
As
atheists it is important to remember that no thinking person
likes to endure proselytizing
by others — either
by theists, or indeed
by atheists.
SisterChromatid - your missing my point I am not trying to trample anyone else s free speech, I just personally think it could have been said differently, what they said makes them appear
like the self righteous ones and that helps no one, as someone who is spiritual and gay I have been judged
by both Christians and
atheists alike, one says I am going to hell the other says I'm a nutjob, when does it stop?
For the vast majority of
atheists I've talked to, all that they know is that they don't
like the rules that Christians are told to live
by.
You're really going to
like the next Pope... My boy Petrus Romanus will have the
atheists among you squealing a new tune
by the time we're done.
Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live
by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my
atheist friends, and
like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my
atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.
Nothing brings out the lonely,
atheist trolls
like a story about a courageous man sustained
by faith.
you mean
atheists are condescending and mean when they point out inconstancies and outright lies thrown around
by some believers
like yourself.
If
atheists have any disdain for religion, it is because of all the harm religion does around the world and the inherent discrimination that we face every day
by the
likes of people,
like you.
It is just
like atheists to step over His seeds that get blown
by the wind to find their way to fertile grounds.
«It seems
like there's this idea perpetuated
by atheists that
atheists are somehow disenfranchised or left out of the political process,» Cupp says.
But
like DearbornGuy said, a lot of the
atheists here are not defined
by reason.
Right... Just
like people who buy books
by a guy (Christopher Hitchens) who says
atheist communists should be considered theists and Martin Luther King was not a true Christian... and who lost debates to William Lane Craig and Rowan Williams are not gullible.
If the
atheist was dressed
like a monkey and had a poster saying «I'm a nig * ah», would anyone be surprised that a black guy walking
by would want to punch him?
I'd submit that the SBNR,
like the
atheist, is defined first and foremost
by their rejection of structured belief systems they find invalid.
I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual texts - and so they try to remove themselves from gory genocidal tales, misogyny and anecdotal professions of a man / god, (2) can't defend and are turned off
by organized religious history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife with cruelty, criminal behavior and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate ethics from their respective religious moral code - they,
like many theists on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis of morality resides in their respective spiritual guides / traditions and (4) are unable to separate from the communal (social) benefits of their respective religion (many
atheists aren't either).
Atheists like myself push because we are constantly pushed
by the religious.
Pippa Evans and Sanderson Jones — two British comedians — have opened the Sunday Assembly, which is calling itself the first
atheist church in the U.K. «We thought it would be a shame not to enjoy the good stuff about religion,
like the sense of community, just because of a theological disagreement,» says Mr. Jones, who once sold out a show the Sydney Opera House
by selling all his tickets
by hand, which is pretty impressive.
Yet again I am so amused
by the popular
atheists who flock to articles
like this to throw out words
like «dumb» «stupid» «idiots» «morons» and then use same overused arguments proposed
by authors such as Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris.
And what the Chinese government is doing is no worse than what several theocracies around the world are doing and what assholes
like Rick Santorum would do in the USA if given the chance — none of which is supported
by atheists.
They are acting just
like the
atheists who are «offended»
by public display of religion.
Thus when Prime Minister Julia Gillard (an avowed
atheist who makes Nancy Pelosi seem
like Margaret Thatcher) nonetheless announced that a «gay marriage» proposal would get a «conscience vote» in the federal parliament, she was accused
by her lefter - than - left opponents of being... undemocratic.
Men kill yes even
atheists like Stalin, Mao, Poll Pot kill millions so your use of that argument is dead as are all the people killed
by atheists.
There are two sides to this people... there have been atrocities commited
by religious fanatics, but also
by atheists,
like the NaTsis and Bolshevics
A believer could act
like an
atheist, I suppose, but what would he learn about
atheists that he could not get
by just reading some
atheist literature or talking to some
atheists?
i see many of you christians and
atheists «KUF ** FAR» wrote alot of messages full of hatred and enmity but the reality is that you don't have basic knowledge of islam or did not read the quran (koran) except you heard some stereotyping articles, reports or books from the media and elites of brainwashing and conspiring,
like zionists, illuminatis, free masons and all the so called non-muslim experts of islam hired
by the TV stations owned and controlled
by masters of stereotyping.
I guess I feel
like it's a harmless symbol and that
by fighting it
atheists give it power.
Was an
atheist ever a president?You are standing as an obstacle trying to stop the future and evolution
by forcing god down peoples throats.Militants
like you say this.
There is your answer to what terrifies an
atheist... if any other non believer would
like to add or change something i have said,
by all means... but i think i hit the nail on the head!
At the same time, she writes in a later blog that the main point she wished to make in her earlier article is that
atheists like her don't need belief in the biblical God in order to maintain certain ethical principles
by reason alone, in the light of experience, and thus in a «conservative» manner.
You can attempt to use the comments
by anyone you
like, strong or weak
atheist or believer, but without real evidence, all you have is an opinion and faith.
You are judging, your opening line for example said... «It's not
like atheists offer people anything» You gave no explanation as to what you meant
by that, and you made a sweeping statement about all
atheists.
Even without acknowledging God, the
atheist in this article feels and knows that it is good to work for charitable efforts
like helping the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society fight cancer... for
by doing so we live out «love your neighbor as yourself» and
by following this commandment from God — Jesus Christ's summary of the Law — we experience «God is Love.»
It's a far - flung concept — one that's been rejected
by famous
atheists like Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins, who have dedicated their lives to fighting against all organized religion.
As for Pastor Mike and his
atheist registry,
like so many other strongly religious people I've encountered, he's equating religion with morality, as if, without religious belief (the right religious belief), you are incapable of possessing and living
by a moral / ethical code.
So
atheists are well within their rights to be offended
by things, just
like you may be as well.