This is the main infrared database used
by atmospheric radiation modellers.
There is a temperature gradient caused
by atmospheric radiations — warm air rises, expands and cools in lower pressure at height — but this is just the lapse rate and doesn't create cooler temps at height.
Not exact matches
Instead of dissipating into space, the infrared
radiation that is absorbed
by atmospheric water vapor or carbon dioxide produces heating, which in turn makes the earths surface warmer.
The researchers posit that the planet's light is possibly a combination of
radiation from its heated surface and light reflected
by surface materials, such as lava and
atmospheric vapor.
This Čerenkov
radiation was detected
by imaging
atmospheric Čerenkov telescopes (IACTs), such as HESS (High Energy Stereoscopic System) in Namibia, MAGIC (Major
Atmospheric Gamma Imaging Čerenkov) in the Canary Islands, and VERITAS (Very Energetic
Radiation Imaging Telescope Array Systems) in Arizona.
By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious
atmospheric greenhouse effects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned difference of 33 C is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity
radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the
atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified
These components — specifically aerosols (particulates in the air — dust, soot, sulphates, nitrates, pollen etc.) and
atmospheric chemistry (ozone, methane)-- are both affected
by climate and affect climate, since aerosols and ozone can interact, absorb, reflect or scatter solar and thermal
radiation.
I developed and host a web interface to the modtran model of
atmospheric infrared
radiation, an early example of a line -
by - line code which I downloaded and use to teach and as part of a textbook.
And energy out mostly
by radiation, however, as much as 20 % of escaping energy is simply highly energized
atmospheric molecules; which furthers vertical convection all the way out to the inside of Earth's magnetic bottle, and the Van Allen
radiation belt.
Phloretin CF features a patented synergistic combination of 2 % phloretin, 10 % pure vitamin C (l - ascorbic acid), and 0.5 % ferulic acid for enhanced protection against
atmospheric skin aging — environmental damage and premature signs of aging caused
by free radicals from UVA / UVB, infrared
radiation (IRA), and ozone pollution (O3).
By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious
atmospheric greenhouse effects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned difference of 33 C is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity
radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the
atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified
The work is an estimate of the global average based on a single - column, time - average model of the atmosphere and surface (with some approximations — e.g. the surface is not truly a perfect blackbody in the LW (long - wave) portion of the spectrum (the wavelengths dominated
by terrestrial /
atmospheric emission, as opposed to SW
radiation, dominated
by solar
radiation), but it can give you a pretty good idea of things (fig 1 shows a spectrum of
radiation to space); there is also some comparison to actual measurements.
The elevation of the
atmospheric temperature is due to a shift in the radiative equilibrium, i.e. more back
radiation absorbed
by added gases, selective to IR
radiation.
Such proximity introduces hazards that are of negligible importance for life on Earth: increased exposure to (time - varying) short wavelength
radiation, stronger magnetic fields, tidal effects, and
atmospheric removal
by the stellar wind.
However, under a climate mitigation scenario for the twenty - first century in which sulphate aerosols decline before
atmospheric CO2 is stabilized, this «diffuse -
radiation» fertilization effect declines rapidly to near zero
by the end of the twenty - first century.»
The haze reduced the seasonal average solar
radiation absorbed
by the equatorial Indian ocean
by as much as 30 to 60 W m − 2 during September to November 1997, and increased the
atmospheric solar heating
by as much as 50 % to 100 % within the first 3 kilometers.
Jet streams are caused
by the earth's rotation and
atmospheric heating
by solar
radiation.
Moreover, the
atmospheric temperature gradient is mitigated
by the absorption of solar
radiation within the atmosphere (also latent heat deposition), thus a more moderate temperature gradient is established within the ral atmosphere.
The accuracy of RRTMG is verified through comparison to AER's reference
radiation code LBLRTM, which is directly validated with
atmospheric measurements provided
by high - quality spectral measurements from satellite -, aircraft - and ground - based instruments.
Glacial periods give way to interglacials on some occasions when the Northern Hemisphere's summer solar insolation (the amount of solar
radiation received
by Earth's surface) increases alongside corresponding decreases in ice volume and increases in temperature and
atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2).
When an
atmospheric molecule absorbs energy
by conduction or
radiation it vibrates faster thereby becoming warmer.
So we have the surprising logical conclusion that GHGs should actually facilitate
atmospheric cooling
by permitting upward
radiation which could not otherwise occur.
«The trapping of thermal infrared
radiation by atmospheric gases is typical of the atmosphere and is therefore called the
atmospheric effect.
The principles of absorption and emission of
radiation by various
atmospheric trace gases like water vapor and CO2 rely on the theory of quantum mechanics.
A particular worry of mine is that some developing nations, faced with a climate crisis, may use the notion of the past uncompensated
atmospheric imperialism
by rich nations as a moral justification for launching a unilateral assault on the climate,
by means of solar
radiation management.
«Carbon dioxide absorbs in the
atmospheric «window» from 7 to 14 micrometers which transmits thermal
radiation emitted
by the earth's surface and lower atmosphere.
Increased
atmospheric CO2 tends to close this window and cause outgoing
radiation to emerge from higher, colder levels, thus warming the surface and lower atmosphere
by the so called greenhouse mechanism»
As such there is little point in SCIENCE to be made
by quoting any reference to «greenhouse effects» (IPCC included) If you notice the plot of
atmospheric absorbance within the link (*): - http://www.ucimc.org/newswire/display/113579/index.php#comments -: you will see that the supposed «greenhouse
radiation» is not even seen being surface incident.
By Amber Bentley (Aged 11) In just 16 pages, this wonderful book covers the structure of the atmosphere, solar
radiation, the water cycle, clouds, fronts, convection, air pressure, air masses, the global
atmospheric circulation, making weather observations, forecasting, synoptic charts, hurricanes, regional climate, palaeoclimates and anthropogenic climate change.
The dimming was shown to be accompanied
by significant
atmospheric absorption of solar
radiation by black and brown carbon (a form of organic carbon).
Thus a change of water vapour, sky
radiation and tempcrature is corrected
by a change of cloudiness and
atmospheric circulation, the former increasing the reflection loss and thus reducing the effective sun heat.
A separate report in the Journal of Climate
by Australian
atmospheric scientist J. Garratt found significant errors in GCM estimates of incoming solar
radiation.
As demonstrated
by my modest experiment (1 & 2) the presence of the
atmospheric molecules participating in the conductive, convective and latent heat movement processes renders this ideal black body
radiation impossible.
14), addresses the mechanisms of
atmospheric heat transfer not only via
radiation but also
by convection, which is not mentioned once in the IPCC's scientific reports (Ref.
At the temperature the atmosphere is, it radiates infrared so this
radiation interacts with the
atmospheric matter exactly in the same way as the
radiation emitted
by the ground does.
Research published in 2008
by Arizona State University professor Peter Crozier suggests that this nanoscale
atmospheric aerosol species is abundant in the atmosphere over East Asian countries and should be explicitly included in models of radiative forcing (the gap between energy
radiation reaching the Earth and that leaving through the upper atmosphere).
Leaf area index, which is also enhanced
by increasing
atmospheric carbon dioxide, was the second most important factor, contributing an additional 21.8 percent, followed
by climate change (precipitation and air temperature together) and the fraction of photosynthetically active
radiation, which accounted for the remaining 18.3 and 14.6 percent increase in NPP, respectively.
The power of the surface
radiation increases
by the Stefan - Boltzmann law until it (over time) compensates for the
atmospheric absorption.»
Earth's Greenhouse Effect is described as all about radiant effects: Wiki: «The greenhouse effect is a process
by which thermal
radiation from a planetary surface is absorbed
by atmospheric greenhouse gases, and is re-radiated in all directions.
These so - called greenhouse gases absorb infrared
radiation, emitted
by the Earth's surface, the atmosphere and clouds, except in a transparent part of the spectrum called the «
atmospheric window», as shown in Figure 1.2.
Instead
atmospheric physics uses the fundamental equations (the radiative transfer equations) which determine absorption and emission of
radiation by water vapor, CO2, methane, and other trace gases.
The physics of
atmospheric thermodynamics, especially with all the unknowns that exist, is I believe far too complex to use simple arguments like «
radiation is trapped, and therefore the temperature should rise
by X degrees».
ABSTRACT Large changes in solar ultraviolet
radiation can indirectly affect climate
by inducing
atmospheric changes.
Until or unless the planetary body is at the same temperature as deep space there will always be energy input at the bottom of the
atmospheric column (and a temperature gradient) and there will always be heat loss
by radiation (or some other means like boiling off of the atmosphere) at the top of the column.
The atmosphere is analogous to a flexible lens that is shaped
by the density distribution of the gas molecules, of the atmosphere in the space between the sphere holding them, and space; Incoming heat gets collected in many ways and places,, primarily
by intermittent solar
radiation gets stored, in vast quantities, and slowly but also a barrage of mass and energy fluxes from all directions; that are slowly transported great distances and to higher altitudes mostly
by oceanic and
atmospheric mass flows.
The Americans — who published their findings on Sunday in Nature Climate Change — ran two different climate models, CAM3.5 and HadCM3L — the one devised
by the US National Center for
Atmospheric Research and the other
by the UK Met Office's Hadley Centre and simulated a doubling of
atmospheric CO2 concentrations, temperature - compensating stratospheric solar
radiation management (SRM) geoengineering — and compared precipitation changes.
He showed that
atmospheric absorption of long - wave
radiation was constant for 61 years while at the same time carbon dioxide increased
by 21.6 percent.
He deduced that the cooperation of these gases has to take the form of an optimal
atmospheric transmittance window for infrared
radiation, such that if the concentration of one gas, say carbon dioxide, varies and changes
atmospheric transmittance, the other components, such as water vapor, will have to compensate for it
by changing their concentrations.
All the NASA and Trenberth et al energy diagrams treat solar
radiation and
atmospheric radiation exactly the same, with a clear implication that the energy in
radiation from the atmosphere is converted to thermal energy in the surface, which could then exit
by evaporation, diffusion or additional
radiation.
Yet on these sites (and in the media, and even
by a few semi related scientists who kinda keep an eye on the issue or are semi involved) treat it as if it is some sort of both immediate, and linear, contemporaneous correlation between increased lower level
atmospheric re
radiation, and increased (or changed) global ambient air temperatures, which is absurd, and belies any real deep understanding of the actual issue.