So no matter if they are right or not, we are influenced
by authoritative opinions.
Not exact matches
Nor is the
opinion that most people attain salvation contradicted
by authoritative Church teaching.
In an email exchange on the general issue of scientists and policy debate last weekend (just before she flew to Antarctica), she said: «If we as scientists go beyond what we know into our personal
opinions and values, we begin to engage in the same sort of personal speculation masquerading as
authoritative that we dislike when it is done
by the skeptics.»
Their experts arrive at the
opinions that the IPCC proffers, which therefore makes the IPCC an
authoritative body and its reports correct as they are written
by their authors who are leading experts...
Judith has claimed expertise
by virtue of appointing herself to make
authoritative claims as to who can and can't «responsibly» claim «expertise» that merits involvement in public discussions that have policy implications (as well as, btw, appointing herself as an authority on decision - making in the face of uncertainty), and that her
opinions should be stamped with the authority of a «expert» because she has written some blog posts on the subject.
With
authoritative written
opinions, however, judges have felt themselves bound
by decisions made generations or even centuries ago.
I pay substantial attention to the municipal securities industry guidance published
by professional organisations and also research regulations and
authoritative books and other literature as a way to double - check, and demonstrate substantive support for my
opinions.
These
opinions are
authoritative, but they are generated
by judges who may have never met the parties to the conflict.