Sentences with phrase «by authors»

I've been reading books and blogs by authors like yourself and appreciate the recipes with basis, pantry stamples in a whole food pantry.

Books do not just grow, but are composed by authors who have certain goals in view and follow certain methods in arranging and composing their materials.

It is perhaps worth noting at this point that in the synoptic gospels such parallelism occurs only in sayings, not in comments made by the authors themselves.

If one reads further one sees that this particular thesis is not only accepted uncritically by the authors of On the Way to Life but is regarded positively by them.

Folk hymns are not great poetry and they are not intended as such by their authors.

So the sentence repeated by the authors of On the Way to Life should be understood to mean that «Grace makes human nature to be human nature», that grace is «essential to the meaning of the term «human nature», that «grace is part of the definition of human nature» (along, therefore, with being composed of soul and body).

Most of the writings are by authors, who were not born until Jesus had died.

I am having difficulty in understanding what the Latin Church would say to these positions, if in fact they are in disagreement as is supposed by these authors.

So are the miracle wheat and rice of the Green Revolution, the technology of behavior modification proposed by B. F. Skinner, 1 and the computerized model of the global ecology produced by the authors of The Limits to Growth.2 This kind of reasoning operates within the limits of what is possible as defined by (1) the available material and human resources, (2) the laws of nature, and (3) the state of knowledge at the time.

Ironically, that is the point decisively rejected by the authors of Human Sexuality as being conservative and life - denying.

The judgment of Jesus was deliberately portrayed by the authors of Matt 25 as something very opposite of my experience with the pragmatic church - is - business approach.

Did you ever hear that there were other books, letters, and documents that were written near the time the books of the Bible were written, claiming to be by authors like the Apostles Andrew, Thomas, Peter, and Paul, but which are not found in our Bible?

Readers can't know to what degree the document's apparent rubber - stamping of the culture of death was intended by its authors, or to what degree it simply follows from sloppy thinking and careless rhetoric.

Waterman remarks that much has been made by some authors of the fact that there is no mention in The Wealth of Nations of «Jesus», «Christ», or «the Son».

The fact that this word is an adjective also makes it less likely to mean some form of the word «complete» was meant by the authors.

Without any expression of bodily or emotional pair - bonding love, this guy is merely a caricature created by authors» for their purposes.

For instance, he completely ignores the fact that the majority of NT scholars in the world believe that much of the NT is pseudepigraphic (that many of the NT books were not written by the authors whom tradition claims wrote them).

Though I was excited to read it, and agree in principle with the «Simple Church» concept, that every church needs to drastically simplify what it is doing so that it can do a better job of making disciples, I was a tiny bit disappointed with some of the approaches used by the authors.

In classic style the book collects together more than a dozen discussions by authors, varying in their ecclesial loyalty devoted to particular aspects of inter-denominational theological conflict (although one contributor from an Eastern Orthodox perspective - David Bentley Hart - allows himself to get in some powerful blows against some of his peers in his own camp).

Ones like it seem to appear every few years and reflect an inner anger by the authors, a bad sign for them.

The simple morals of not killing and not stealing were not invented by the authors of the bible; they have long been a part of human culture.

In each case, the passion to evoke a culture in letters seems driven by the authors» sense that their cultures are fading away, doomed to certain and swift dissipation into the pervasive ethos of modern America.

I emphasize that these and other comparisons are being constructed from my interpretation of the trinitarian theologies of Leonardo Boff and Raimon Panikkar and have not been named in this way by the authors themselves.

The fundamental distinction between sexual orientation, and sexual behavior, for example, seems to have been lost or disregarded by the authors of Educational Guidance.

The distinction, I believe, is not between older and younger Jesuits - the categories most often used by the authors - but rather between those whose attitudes were shaped by the ideological revolutions of the 1960s and the rest of the Society.

Most of them, to judge by what I've seen of them and their advance notices, are by authors who want to change the subject - to what's wrong with church teaching on sexuality, to celibacy, to women's ordination, to democratizing decision making, to anything but fidelity.

And these people scoff at contradictions in the Bible; a collection of literature written over three millenia, by authors who never met each other to compare notes, in various places in the Middle East and around the Mediteranean, in various times.

A statement written by a spokesperson for LifeWay said: «LifeWay only carries resources in our stores by authors who hold to the biblical view of marriage.

Actually they were borrowed from Northrop Frye, The Anatomy of Criticism, 131 - 239, as is noted by the authors, Handbook for Congregational Studies, ed.

And there were many others by authors of several of persuasions, most pointing up the accomplishments of Jesus Christ.

(These books are revised sociology dissertations, and it is necessary for me to record that I am thanked by both authors.)

In our personal involvement with scripture, it is easy to forget that these texts were written by authors who lived in a time, a place, a historical and cultural setting very different from ours.

He is currently being sued in a British court by the authors of an earlier book, Holy Blood, Holy Grail, who claim that Brown stole the «architecture» of his story from them.

In retrospect, most of the fiction I loved was penned by authors who were deeply informed by Christianity.

Many and sometimes most of the weekly papers are by authors who actually wanted to remember that they learned something crucial, and that experience rarely keeps them from being critical and even playing the texts off against each other.

I have recently started seeing books get published by authors who skip steps 1 - 7 and just focus their hardest on Step 8.

As far as creating opportunities for dialog within your faith communities, I'd recommend starting with a book club, perhaps around a book like Trouble I've Seen by Drew Hart, or The New Jim Crow by Michelle Alexander, or Assimilate or Go Home by Danielle Mayfield, or Forgive Us by the authors mentioned above — something that's not directly about this election or this presidency, but that addresses issues related to justice.

Whether these interpretative «morals» were added by the authors — or editors — of the Gospels or represent accretions to the narratives in the oral period does not greatly matter; what we want is the original parable or saying as it came from the lips of Jesus.

In each case, the passion to evoke a culture in letters seems driven by the authors» sense that their cultures are fading away, doomed to certain and swift dissipation into the pervasive ethos of modern...

Daniel Fuller believes that in non-revelatory matters, there is «error» in the Biblical text which was included deliberately by the authors in order to communicate effectively with their readers.

The plain fact seems to be that both the Personhood of God and the doctrine of God's creation of heaven and earth were accepted by the authors of the New Testament with little question because they were already accepted in Judaism.

This and other questions are pondered by the authors of the books here reviewed.

This strategic relationship between church and society seems to be well understood by the authors included in Homosexuality.

I left college with a bachelors and a long and growing reading list, with works by authors ranging from Aristophanes to Adorno.

The appropriate word to be used in connection with «the road traveled» by the authors of both Genesis and Exodus is «grace,» for grace represents the love of God incarnate in his saving initiative.

Yet again I am so amused by the popular atheists who flock to articles like this to throw out words like «dumb» «stupid» «idiots» «morons» and then use same overused arguments proposed by authors such as Dawkins, Hitchens and Harris.

The God of the bible is just that, a God invented by the authors of the bible with all the human emotions the writers had, anger, jealousy, regret and a short temper.

Similarly, while there may be some value in the refusal to take a moral stance on homosexuality — in order to focus squarely on the nature of marriage rather than on same - sex relationships — I am less than persuaded by the authors» moral judgment that people's sexual relationships are a private issue.

The commonwealth model of marriage held wide appeal among a diverse spectrum of English theologians, and served as the starting point for the liberalizing reforms later urged by authors as different as John Milton and John Locke.

Both of the scientific objections raised by the authors miss the point of the ANT - OAR proposal.