I can do a lot more at less cost
by building nuclear power plants or converting coal fired generators to modern gas - fired ones.
I think we should cut CO2 emmissions
by building nuclear power plants.
Not exact matches
Darin Kingston of d.light, whose profitable solar -
powered LED lanterns simultaneously address poverty, education, air pollution / toxic fumes / health risks, energy savings, carbon footprint, and more Janine Benyus, biomimicry pioneer who finds models in the natural world for everything from extracting water from fog (as a desert beetle does) to construction materials (spider silk) to designing flood - resistant
buildings by studying anthills in India's monsoon climate, and shows what's possible when you invite the planet to join your design thinking team Dean Cycon, whose coffee company has not only exclusively sold organic fairly traded gourmet coffee and cocoa beans since its founding in 1993, but has funded dozens of village - led community development projects in the lands where he sources his beans John Kremer, whose concept of exponential growth through «biological marketing,» just as a single kernel of corn grows into a
plant bearing thousands of new kernels, could completely change your business strategy Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, who
built a near - net - zero - energy luxury home back in 1983, and has developed a scientific, economically viable plan to get the entire economy off oil, coal, and
nuclear and onto renewables — while keeping and even improving our high standard of living
Russia has
built the Busher
nuclear power plant in Iran partially at her own expense on the promise
by Iran that they will be buying
nuclear fuel from Russia for this
plant to operate.
New York State Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo has proposed expanding the Long Island Pine Barrens
by 800 acres around the decommissioned Shoreham
nuclear power plant, but did not include saving a site in Mastic where a developer wants to
build a solar farm.
The electric
power industry can achieve deep reductions in greenhouse gas emissions
by 2050
by building new
nuclear plants, sequestering coal -
plant emissions, boosting wind energy and improving efficiency, the industry's top research group said yesterday.
It also assumes that 45 new
nuclear power plants could be
built by 2030, using existing reactor sites, adding 64 gigawatts of new capacity.
The newest generation of
nuclear power plants builds on a foundation of excellence spanning decades and supported
by significant improvement in
plant efficiency.
But Paul Hatchwell, an environment consultant, wrote recently in a report for the World Wide Fund for Nature that both the Sizewell site and the Bradwell
nuclear power plant in Essex,
built on marshes
by the Blackwater estuary, are «poorly defended».
I needed a research paper on a small company that makes vacuum cleaners and the writer said that vacuum cleaner company should diversify
by «
building nuclear power plants.»
For example, the
nuclear operations group — which supplies critical
nuclear components to the
nuclear power plants onboard U.S. navy ships — spends about 5 to 9 years
building a component which is then installed and run
by the navy for more than 30 years before being retired.
This EPR
plant represents the «new generation» of
nuclear power plants that would supposedly be faster and cheaper to
build, and free of the problems that plagued previous designs, and has been touted
by the industry as the foundation of its «revival».
And yes central
power will be another piece (
nuclear is great for baseload
power... it operates at 90 % capacity factors even if the price of
building a new
plant has risen
by 130 % since 2000) Centralized wind and solar will mature but then there's the transmission issue...
By the time that new
nuclear power plants can even begin to generate any «carbon free» electricity, we can
build and deploy hundreds of gigawatts of wind and solar generating capacity — and that's with today's mainstream, already commercialized technology, let alone the innovations like thin - film solar that are just beginning to enter the market.
The last time I looked (early»80s) he wanted a crash reindustrialization program funded
by the federal government and
building 1,500 new
nuclear power plants.
Couldn't a developed country contribute equally to the amelioration of warming
by, say,
building 40 new
nuclear power plants?
Second, the scenario assumes no deployment of carbon capture and sequestration technology and a phase out of
nuclear power by 204... with no new
nuclear plants built after 2008.
The following graphs compare Section 201 with the call
by some in Congress for a massive U.S. effort to
build 100 new
nuclear power plants in an attempt to move the country toward energy independence and significant GHG emissions reductions (click either image to enlarge):
That is demonstrated
by the fact they are
building nuclear power plants for smelting aluminium to sell on the world market.
* The MH - 1A Sturgis floating
nuclear power plant, a 45 - MW pressurized water reactor, was the first floating
nuclear plant to be
built (and the last
nuclear power plant built and operated
by the U.S. Army).
How many emissions were prevented
by the one newly
built nuclear power plant in the USA (2016) since the one before this one became operational in 1996?
In 1983, Graham Allison, then dean of the Kennedy School of Government, and Albert Carnesale, then professor of public policy there, wrote an essay describing the dilemma faced
by a utility director weighing whether to
build a coal or a
nuclear power plant.
The money to
build nuclear power plants was provided
by government as no private industry wanted to foot the bill.
[3] Each state has interim targets it must meet beginning in 2020, and the EPA proposed that states use a combination of four «
building blocks» to achieve the emissions reductions: (1) improving the efficiency (heat rate) of existing coal - fired
power plants; (2) switching from coal - fired
power by increasing the use and capacity factor, or efficiency, of natural - gas combined - cycle
power plants; (3) using less carbon - intensive generating
power, such as renewable energy or
nuclear power; and (4) increasing demand - side energy - efficiency measures.
And don't forget to make the point that the 10 coal fired
power stations are being
built to replace the
nuclear power plants Germany is being forced to close down
by the irrational, extremist, loony greenies:)
I love the circular logic... CO2 causes the planet to warm causing sea level to rise and more storms on coasts... therefore do not
build nuclear power plants... which would save the planet from the CO2 generated
by non-
nuclear power plants.
By the time any new nuclear power plant can actually be built and brought online in the USA, it will simply not be able to sell its extremely expensive electricity at profit in a market transformed by wind and solar and efficiency technologie
By the time any new
nuclear power plant can actually be
built and brought online in the USA, it will simply not be able to sell its extremely expensive electricity at profit in a market transformed
by wind and solar and efficiency technologie
by wind and solar and efficiency technologies.
Since then, risk assessment has been used to estimate the probability of a catastrophic meltdown at a
nuclear power plant, or the probability of a population of grizzly bears becoming locally extinct because too many roads were cut into their forest home, or the probability of children having their IQ lowered
by exposure to toxic lead and PCBs in the soil near schools
built on a toxic waste dump.
According to Financial Times Fortum aims to invest 15 per cent in a controversial Finnish
nuclear power plant to be
built by Rosatom, the Russian state - owned energy company.
Aside from the dangers and harms presented
by expanding the use of coal and
nuclear, the poor countries of the world simply don't have the resources to
build the
power plants or the distribution grids.
In the afternoon, we were joined
by several local activists from the nearby town of Plogoff, who successfully campaigned against a new
nuclear power plant being
built on the coastline in the 1970s.