Sentences with phrase «by chapter critiques»

Not exact matches

«For anyone driven crazy by the faux warm and fuzzy PR of the so - called sharing economy Steven Hill's Raw Deal: How the «Uber Economy» and Runaway Capitalism Are Screwing American Workers should be required reading... Hill is an extremely well - informed skeptic who presents a satisfyingly blistering critique of high tech's disingenuous equating of sharing with profiteering... Hill includes two chapters listing potential solutions for the crises facing U.S. workers... Hill stresses the need for movement organizing to create a safety net strong enough to save the millions of workers currently being shafted in venture capital's brave new world.»

In Chapter 5, we observed that the novelty of Jesus» consciousness of God comes to light in an especially shocking way in his critique of the alternative proposals for holiness set forth by several religious movements prevalent at the time he lived and proclaimed the Good News.

In the following chapter I shall provide a Whiteheadian critique of the view of matter presupposed by scientific materialism.

As the chapter continues, Wright tackles postmodern scholarship, which he believes has offered some helpful critiques of Enlightenment assumptions while providing useful analyses of how certain texts might be received by particular groups, but which tends to veer into the complete dismissal of large portions of the biblical text.

Another instance of the illusory precision in Lomborgs energy chapter that I mentioned in my Scientific American critique and which Lomborg seems to think is covered by his «evenly distributed errors» defense is his statement that «the costs of carbon dioxide» are «probably0.64 cents per kWh [kilowatt - hour]».

One thing critique groups can't do well is help with story arc, because we look at things chapter by chapter.

As Anne mentioned last week, some critique groups tend to focus more on line - by - line issues than big picture things, especially because critique groups / partners often see just a chapter or so at a time.

I guess the only difference between betas and critique partners are betas read the entire manuscript at once, and crit partners go through chapter by chapter with you.

What's the situation then if a writer later publishes a book that had prevously been submitted, chapter by chapter, to his critique group?

When you're ready to adjust the minor things, a conventional chapter - by - chapter critique group can be very helpful, if time - consuming.

Unlike the developmental edit, the Novel Critique does not include a chapter - by - chapter breakdown.

Try reading the chapter on model validation in AR5 — you'll never see a more comprehensive critique (if by «comprehensive» one means «specific, serious and constructive»).