Sentences with phrase «by child custody laws»
As governed by child custody laws, Missouri family courts have jurisdiction over custody issues.
http://www.divorcesource.com/
As governed by child custody laws, the courts shall not make custody arrangements based on the child's gender.
As mandated by child custody laws in Massachusetts, the courts are prohibited to make a presumption of favoring one form of custody over another.
This agreement, called a parenting plan, is explicitly allowed by child custody laws in Hawaii and must be submitted to a judge for approval before it can be finalized.
As governed by child custody laws, the family courts have jurisdiction over custody cases.
As mandated by child custody laws in Vermont, the state's family courts determine all custody issues based on the best interests of the child.
As mandated by child custody laws, the court awards child custody based on the best interests of the child.
Iowa courts have jurisdiction over custody issues, and as mandated by child custody laws in Iowa, there are several parameters to determine the parent who can better take care of the child and provide for his or her needs.
Not exact matches
Under District of Columbia law, custody of any child (ren) of the marriage may be granted jointly or to either parent by court decision (order).
Under Maryland law, custody of any child (ren) of the marriage may be granted jointly or to either parent by court decision (order).
Child custody evaluations usually are performed by mental health experts, psychologists or psychiatrists who have specialized training in divorce, family law, and custody arrangements.
Most legal matters involving the family are governed by state law, and child custody is no exception.
As used in this paragraph, a «Covered Borrower» means any person who, at the time such person becomes obligated on a loan transaction or establishes an account for consumer credit, satisfies the requirements under any one or more of the following classifications, or is otherwise under applicable laws deemed to be a «Covered Borrower» under the Military Lending Act, 10 U.S. Code Section 987: (a) An active duty member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force or Coast Guard, or a person serving on active Guard and Reserve duty (a person described in this clause (a) of the definition of «Covered Borrower» is hereinafter referred to as a «Service Member»); or (b) Any of the following persons, relative to a Service Member: (1) The spouse; (2) A child under the age of 21; or (3) If dependent on the Service Member for more than one half of such person's support, any one or more of the following persons: (i) A child under the age of 23 enrolled in a full time course of study at an institution of higher learning; (ii) A child of any age incapable of self support due to a mental or physical incapacity that occurred before attaining age 23 while such person was dependent on the Service Member; (iii) Any unmarried person placed in legal custody of the Service Member who resides with such Service Member unless separated by military service or to receive institutional care or under other circumstances covered by Regulation; or (iv) A parent or parent - in - law residing in the Service Member's household.
The law now allows a judge to grant the petitioner of a protective order exclusive care, custody, or control of any animal owned, possessed, leased, kept, or held by the victim, the abuser, or a minor child in the household; the law also allows a judge to order the abuser to stay away from the pet in both temporary and final domestic violence protective orders.
Written by Waterstone's family law practice group, the blogs focuses on all aspects of family law, and aims to help people better understand the law and process related to issues including adoption, child and spousal support, divorce, custody, agreements, and tax issues.
Members of Ontario's family law bench upped the volume of their objections after Bonkalo's March 2017 report recommended paralegals be allowed to provide legal services, without supervision by lawyers, in the areas of custody, access, simple child support cases, restraining orders, enforcement and simple divorces without property.
Posted Thursday, June 21st, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Legislation, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific 7 Comments»
Posted Monday, October 4th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Guardians Ad Litem, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys
Posted Sunday, September 20th, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, South Carolina Specific
Posted Tuesday, June 15th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation
Posted Wednesday, June 20th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Sunday, April 24th, 2016 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public
Posted Wednesday, February 10th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Continuing Legal Education, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific No Comments»
Notwithstanding the custody arrangement and in addition to all rights and duties given to parents pursuant to Section 63-5-30, each parent has equal access and the same right to obtain all educational records and medical records of his or her minor children and the right to participate in the children's school activities and extracurricular activities that are held in public locations unless prohibited by an order of the court or State law.
Posted Thursday, January 30th, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific 4 Comments»
Posted Sunday, January 2nd, 2011 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisdiction, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys 10 Comments»
The Family Law Act is changing the way that we address issues surrounding children by redefining the issues guardianship, custody and access, as parental responsibilities, parenting time and contact.
As child custody and support is awarded by the judge, you need an assertive law firm, who knows Alabama custody laws intimately and will forcefully and persuasively present your position in order to only accept what is right for your child or children and you.
The Children's Law Act is changing the way that we address issues surrounding children by redefining the issues guardianship, custody and access, as parental responsibilities, parenting time and Children's Law Act is changing the way that we address issues surrounding children by redefining the issues guardianship, custody and access, as parental responsibilities, parenting time and children by redefining the issues guardianship, custody and access, as parental responsibilities, parenting time and contact.
In Ontario, the rights and responsibilities of parties in relation to custody and access are governed by the Divorce Act and the Children's Law Reform Act.
Devised by the Washington state Legislature as a way of providing less expensive legal services to underserved populations, LLLTs are licensed to advise and assist people going through divorce, child custody, and other family law matters in Washington.
Posted Sunday, November 23rd, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisdiction, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys
Posted Sunday, November 23rd, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisdiction, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys 3 Comments»
Posted Friday, July 27th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Adoption / Termination of Parental Rights, Child Custody, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, South Carolina Appellate Decisions
One issue that was frequently identified by family law practitioners was child custody and visitation involving international travel.
In Arizona, child custody rights for fathers are now, by law, equal to those of the children's mothers.
Posted Tuesday, May 5th, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific
Posted Saturday, July 4th, 2015 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific
Posted Tuesday, August 12th, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Jurisprudence, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys 8 Comments»
Posted Thursday, January 30th, 2014 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific
Devoted to the practice of family law, including divorce, child custody and property division, Nichols is regarded as one of the foremost trial specialists by his peers.
NJ Rev Stat § 9:6 - 1 may be the source of the rumor (since it was in the news), but that law prohibits «the habitual use by the parent or by a person having the custody and control of a child, in the hearing of such child, of profane, indecent or obscene language».
When you face divorce or separation, child support or custody, this is the time to have the Law Offices of Adrian H. Altshuler & Associates by your side to vigorously represent your rights.
Since child custody procedures vary by state and this is such an important issue, the best course of action is to speak to a family law attorney licensed in Delaware.
Posted Wednesday, August 23rd, 2017 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys
Posted Wednesday, May 30th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Appellate Decisions, South Carolina Specific 6 Comments»
The most prominent issues that arise with regard to family law in Qatar are divorce and child custody, both governed by the «Family Law of Qatar», Law No. 22 of 20law in Qatar are divorce and child custody, both governed by the «Family Law of Qatar», Law No. 22 of 20Law of Qatar», Law No. 22 of 20Law No. 22 of 2006.
A child's «home state» is defined by statute by a coordinated definitions set forth in parallel laws at the state (the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction And Enforcement Act in 49 states) and federal (the Parental Kidnapping Prevent Act) lchild's «home state» is defined by statute by a coordinated definitions set forth in parallel laws at the state (the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction And Enforcement Act in 49 states) and federal (the Parental Kidnapping Prevent Act) lChild Custody Jurisdiction And Enforcement Act in 49 states) and federal (the Parental Kidnapping Prevent Act) level.
The perspectives of children whose parents were involved in a family law dispute are normally brought before the court in one of five ways: the custody assessment or views of the child report of an expert; an affidavit or letter written by the child; or, a judicial interview.
Posted Tuesday, March 13th, 2012 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Family Court Procedure, Guardians Ad Litem, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys 10 Comments»