We must work together to move towards Democracy 2.0 — a democracy that is informed
by citizen participation, knowledge, information and evidence.
The November deal was improved in a number of ways
by citizen participation both before and after.
Not exact matches
The Constitution could not take for granted that its
citizens would all be motivated
by civic virtue and so its concern was as much to protect individuals and groups from abuse at the hands of the government and their fellow
citizens as it was to involve all its
citizens in genuine
participation.
Because our culture has for so long insidiously taught
citizens that the good life is measured
by their economic success and
participation in the consumer society, it is small wonder so many believe that politics is a burden that conflicts with their pursuit of what really matters.
«When both the logic of the market and the logic of the State come to an agreement that each will continue to exercise a monopoly over its respective area of influence, in the long term much is lost: solidarity in relations between
citizens,
participation and adherence, actions of gratuitousness, all of which stand in contrast with giving in order to acquire (the logic of exchange) and giving through duty (the logic of public obligation, imposed
by State law).
Yet nothing can have a more deadening effect on real
participation by the
citizens than if government, instead of merely providing the essential framework of spontaneous growth, becomes monolithic and takes charge of the provision for all needs, which can be provided for only
by the common effort of many.
But a republic will have republican customs — public
participation in the exercise of power, the political equality of the
citizens, a wide distribution of small and medium property with few very rich or very poor — customs that will lead to a public spiritedness, a willingness of the
citizen to sacrifice his own interests for the common good, that is, to a
citizen motivated
by republican virtue.
In fact the fundamental rights of the
citizen require that all traditional communities change, breaking traditional hierarchies and patriarchies, to bring about social justice
by giving the dalits, the tribals and the women who were excluded from the traditional power - structures of society, fuller
participation in the power - structures; and the State is called upon to assist it
by suitable legislation and other means.
In a discussion about the recent French presidential election at the Personal Democracy Forum unConference this past Saturday, Pascal - Emmanuel Gobry presented an interesting thesis: not only did Ségolène Royal's «net - centric strategy fail to win a majority at the polls, but her campaign's emphasis on
citizen participation may have actually backfired entirely
by undermining her perception as a leader and
by leaving her dependent on a fatally unrepresentative group of voters.
The greatest strength of the Five Stars movement is its network of genuinely motivated
citizens who mobilize consensus
by championing popular causes like anti-nuclear campaigns, direct political
participation, renewable energy reform and the end of conflicts of interest between the public and the private sectors.
Many
citizens would sell their labour - power to make a living, but the context would be reshaped somewhat
by rights of
participation in firm decision - making and, not least,
by a basic income.
The belief that transparent, open government exists, allowing for full
participation and debate
by all
citizens affected
by helicopter noise abuse, is a fantasy.
Move Forward New York is a
citizen action group committed to promoting social justice, preserving civil rights, and ensuring environmental conservation
by encouraging
participation in the political process on all levels through education, collaboration, and activism.
The early voting measure is the first part of a three - point plan Ryan is pushing for, which will address low turnout and boost election
participation by citizens across New York State.
Inclusivity requires wider
participation of the mass of our
citizens by broadening our democratic base.
Citizens Union, a good - government group, has argued that nonpartisan elections will boost voter
participation by opening the process to the 1.4 million people who aren't registered with parties.
These public forums provide an opportunity to increase
citizen awareness and
participation in the Consortium's federal Community Development program
by allowing the general public, as well as agency advocates for low and moderate income individuals, the elderly and handicapped to offer suggestions and information on the needs of these populations to County and municipal officials.
And both agreed there needs to be more
participation in government
by citizens, especially those who live upstate.
For some reason I've become obsessed with NYS Attorney General Eric Schneiderman's recent order ending «English - only» elections in ten upstate counties
by applying a federal law enacted to ensure voter
participation by American
citizens of Puerto Rican heritage that are illiterate in English.
The Broadening
Participation in Computing (BPC) program, funded
by the National Science Foundation (NSF), aims to significantly increase the number of students who are U.S.
citizens and permanent residents receiving post secondary degrees in the computing disciplines.
He suggests that online volunteering and
citizen science projects could incentivise
participation by offering clearly defined opportunities for learning, while representing an effective way of increasing scientific literacy and knowledge within society.
San Diego State University Increasing
citizen participation in e-rulemaking
by harnessing social media
Hence, one of the biggest challenges for the construction of Latin American subject of a new type is conditioned
by these new forms of
citizen participation, appropriation or reappropriation of them whose potential, both for playing domination as mechanisms for mobilizing systemic anti-social, especially digital democracy, is incalculable.
The standard of political and moral performance required to consider should be the following: 1) increase of solidarity among the inhabitants of the country; 2) increase in the practice of social justice
by organs of government and civil society; 3) increase in the distribution of income and wealth among the population; 4) increase of measures to preserve and care for nature; 5) increase in policies for integral development of education in accordance with the highest human values; 6) advances in the realization of the collective will of the
citizens; 7) improvement of political institutions; 8) success in combating corruption measured
by its reduction; 9) increase in the exercise of citizenship with the effective
participation of
citizens in government decisions and fight for expansion of their rights; and 10) increase of contribution of public and private organizations to the political, economic, social and environmental development of the country.
General
citizen apathy toward school spending and policy can be partially explained
by the costs and effort required for active political
participation.
Charging that America is «moving backward» in its efforts to ensure full
participation by minority
citizens in the nation's life and prosperity, a panel of leaders from education, business, and government last week urged all segments of the society to work toward boosting opportunities for minorities.
It presents 12 key findings which focus on four main
citizen requests: immediate and faster climate action
by national leaders; greater finance for climate action; building more progress in line with the different capacities of countries; strengthening the role of
citizen participation in the UN climate negotiations.
It is true that the power and energy of
participation, enabled
by mobile and portable computing devices in the hands of every
citizen with the ability to surpass containment and censorship can successfully build social change collectives across geographies, enemy lines, languages and cultures where it was impossible.»
The analysis
by the National Committee for
Citizens in Education, a nonprofit group, shows that other problems uncovered
by the federal evaluators include poor control of private schools»
participation in the program and inadequate oversight of parental and public involvement.
This report proposes sweeping changes to the way American education is governed, recommends stronger and more centralized government at the state level, and suggests the weakening of lay -
citizen participation in governance in favor of control
by politicians.
As part of
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION, an exhibition organized
by ABC No Rio (in exile), Occupy Museums organized a discussion between ABC No Rio, the Guerrilla Girls, Decolonize This Place and W.A.G.E. to discuss models of sustainable art activist practice and building a sustainable web of mutual support.
Influenced
by the utopian ideals of the progressive education movement, it placed the arts at the center of liberal arts education and believed that in doing so it could better educate
citizens for
participation in a democratic society.
By empowering communities to collect data from their local environment and contribute to an interactive, worldwide environmental database, the folks behind the Smart
Citizen Kit are enabling a whole new level of
participation from
citizen scientists.
«Their
participation is crucial and there needs to be more respect for the process
by the
citizens.
WHEN are law firm partners going to understand that you don't gain loyalty, commitment, and a sense of
participation by treating people like second - class
citizens.
penalizes the defendant for engaging in public
participation «plaintiff» means a person who initiates or maintains a proceeding against a defendant; «proceeding» means any action, suit, matter, cause, counterclaim, appeal, or originating application that is brought in the Supreme Court or the Provincial Court, but does not include a prosecution for an offence or a crime; «public interest» means the whole of the subject matter invites public attention, or a matter in which the public has some substantial concern because it affects the welfare of citizens, or one to which considerable public notoriety or controversy has attached; «public participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public opinion, or promoting further lawful action by the public or any government body, in relation to an issue of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an impr
participation «plaintiff» means a person who initiates or maintains a proceeding against a defendant; «proceeding» means any action, suit, matter, cause, counterclaim, appeal, or originating application that is brought in the Supreme Court or the Provincial Court, but does not include a prosecution for an offence or a crime; «public interest» means the whole of the subject matter invites public attention, or a matter in which the public has some substantial concern because it affects the welfare of
citizens, or one to which considerable public notoriety or controversy has attached; «public
participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public opinion, or promoting further lawful action by the public or any government body, in relation to an issue of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an impr
participation» means communication or conduct aimed at influencing public opinion, or promoting further lawful action
by the public or any government body, in relation to an issue of public interest; «Strategic Lawsuit Against Public
Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an impr
Participation (SLAPP)» means a claim that arises from a form of expression or public
participation, by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an impr
participation,
by the person against whom the claim is asserted that was made in connection with an official proceeding or about a matter of public interest; Purposes of this Act: 2 The purposes of this Act are to a) Establish a statutory right to public
participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an impr
participation for every individual; b) Encourage individuals to express themselves on matters of public interest; c) Promote broad
participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an impr
participation in debates on matters of public interest; d) Discourage the use of litigation as a means of unduly limiting expression on matters of public interest; and, e) Preserve the right of access to the courts for all proceedings and claims that are not brought or maintained for an improper purpose.
This week, we look at a novel use of
citizen participation laws to force the prosecutor's hand in the case of Tamir Rice, the 12 - year - old Cleveland boy shot dead
by police for playing with a toy gun.
The Court argues at paragraph 29 that such an administrative failure can undermine the purpose of the mechanism of the European
Citizens Initiative «of encouraging participation by citizens in democratic life and of making the European Union more accessible
Citizens Initiative «of encouraging
participation by citizens in democratic life and of making the European Union more accessible
citizens in democratic life and of making the European Union more accessible.»
It is not sufficient to answer, as the State does here, that whatever repressive effect compulsory disclosure of names of petitioner's members may have upon
participation by Alabama
citizens in petitioner's activities follows not from state action, but from private community pressures.
• It should provide a speedy and cheap method to stop lawsuits if those suits were brought for an improper purpose, namely to harass or intimidate the defendants; • It should put the onus on plaintiffs to prove that their lawsuits were not improper; • It should help rebalance an inequality of financial resources between the parties, possibly
by an order that the plaintiff should pay the defendants» costs at the outset of the litigation; • It should provide stronger legal protection for
citizens engaged in public
participation, such as through special defences; • It should deter people from bringing such suits in the first place,
by exposing plaintiffs, and possibly their directors and officers, and lawyers, to awards of damages or even punitive damages.
There have been suggestions in recent years that the whole notion of meaningful
citizen participation in lawmaking has fallen out of fashion — that no matter how hard you try, or how sincere your efforts, the legislative outcome is predetermined
by forces beyond your control.