Sentences with phrase «by claims history»

That may be future risk, or it may be based on past risk shown by claims history and the like.

Despite his side's impressive start to the season, coach Guardiola has sought to temper expectations of a strong run in the Champions League by claiming history is against his new club.

Not exact matches

The claim by many that Kim can not be deterred by military means is not merely hollow, but also ignores the history of more than 60 years of Kim family rule.

But the MLM model also has a reputation sullied by a history of pyramid schemes, get - rich promises, and fraudulent claims about products and compensation.

A new set of crash tests by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety questions Tesla «s claim that the Model S is the safest car in history.

the history of this epic Facebook privacy fail is even longer than the under - disclosed events of 2015 suggest — i.e. when Facebook claims it found out about the breach as a result of investigations by journalists.

Idaho had been vetting plans that would impose annual limits on claims and set prices based on medical history - two things barred by the Affordable Care Act.

Remember that the policyholder tarnishes their claim history with each one they file, including claims filed by anyone else listed on the policy.

It is wishful thinking to imagine that the most extreme economic, debt and investment bubble in history was corrected by a mild economic downturn, a market decline that leaves stocks at 21 times peak earnings (higher than at the 1929 and 1987 peaks), and just a few large - scale defaults from a corporate debt position which continues to claim a record share of operating earnings to finance.

Forbes, in turn, notes that Trump has a long history of trying to inflate his Forbes valuation and decades ago editors even joked about having a «Trump rule» when assessing Trump's net worth - consider the amount Trump claims and then divide it by three to get the real worth.

If their robot executes trades with the kind of profit the site claims, then why would the people behind it want to hide that fact by providing no trade history at all?

Always remember: «By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record.»

And then the evidence of history pointed toward Jesus having lived, having made these extraordinary claims and then backing that up by returning from the dead.

It's concession by rewriting history, claiming no conflict with science by denying that the exposed belief was never literal / relevant / real.

But we maintain, on the contrary, that we know the Jesus of history very well, even if we do not have a precise and photographic account of his day - by - day activities; and the unique claim of Christianity is that in and by those events in the actual realm of historical happenedness, God is revealed — revealed, of course, in and under the conditions of history and human life, but revealed nonetheless.

It, to me, is similar to claiming the name of Christ — no matter what it means to you as an individual, by claiming that name, you are connecting yourself to a massive, rich history of people who all have the name of Christ in common.

Sociology: Auguste Comte, the founder of sociology, claimed that the religious phase of history had ended, replaced by the higher truths of science.

The New Testament claims that this Jesus of history, whose father and mother were well known to his contemporaries (John 6:42) is at the same time the pre-existent Son of God, and side by side with the historical event of the crucifixion it sets the definitely non-historical event of the resurrection.

Again, theologians who are persuaded of their usefulness in conveying theological meaning to the contemporary mind may have gone so far as to claim emergent evolution to be a theological symbol by which biblical events of history as well as subsequent doctrinal formulations may be explicated.

As neil degrasse tyson pointed out, each of our great mathematicians and scientists throughout the centuries reached their limit and declared God did it... only to have the next guy push though that barrier, reach their own limit... and claim the same... This lady has the benefit of history and science at her finger tips, and judging by her credentials is no stranger to the scientific process, and still fell into the same trap...

Structuralism claimed that the binary oppositions that structure human thought are essentially universal and unaffected by culture or history.

By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.

You can neither prove nor deny the truth claims of Christianity but I will not sit idly by as you attempt to rewrite history.

The Mad Among Us By Gerald N. Grob Harvard University Press, 386 pages, $ 16.95 paper An admirably comprehensive account of the history of the care of the mentally ill in the United States, more admirable for the modesty of its claims.

Sure, David goes on to say that he was uneasy with such a claim and wasn't even sure that it was true, but still... how do you write a book which is supposed to be about taking back your faith from the American Dream and start the book by stating that you are the youngest megachurch pastor in American history?

While claiming that the whole of creation has as its very structure the Sabbath principle, Barth qualifies this statement by suggesting that creation (through its culmination in the Sabbath rest) paints also to redemptive history (to covenant) and to the final consummation of the same.

Regrettably, this book might end up by persuading a reader who is not familiar with the history or literature that the enemies of anti-Semitism are infected by the same spirit of fanaticism and conspiracy - mongering that they claim to be combating.

His machine is just as much an abstraction as he claims the materialists» matter is: an arbitrary, idealized device with absolutely identical interchangeable parts, with no history and no determinate future, completely subject to adjustment and transformation by its human inventors and users.

Likewise, Sandeep Banerjee of the Times Of India suggested that «the Spanish Inquisition could lay claim to being one of the bloodiest chapters of human history, scripted by the Vatican's Holy Office of the Inquisition, now called the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, an office the current Pope once headed before his elevation.»

The CCP stirs the nationalistic emotions of the people by contesting Japan over issues such as: the disputed territorial claims with China: its writing of history that omits Japanese atrocities in its invasion of China, and in recent visits by its leaders to Japan's Yasukuni shrine which honors national heroes including convicted war criminals.2

... you can claim free will and by so cover all of the human actions done to the world but how can say that god is real and controls nature when nature has killed more purely innocent lives then anything in history ever... if god was just and comp@ssinate why send the wave that killed 300 thousand, why create the plague that killed nearly 75 million in the middle ages when nearly everyone was a VERY devout believer....

However, when discussing the uniqueness of Jesus Christ, Wheeler maintains that whether «Jesus Christ's divine - human unity is the sole member of its class, as evangelical Christians would typically claim,» or is «a paradigmatic member of a class with multiple members» as Whiteheadians contend, this crucial unity can be construed more fundamentally by those in both groups as an example of a systemic change of the God - world relationship happening once in the history of humanity globally (105).

My humble advise to you is to go and study the history that how, when and who wrote these chapters and what type of time it went through and then say that if there is any statement in this book is the real time statements of Jesus PBUH... please be honest with yourself... and don't do anything to please others but only you... and make sure you are convince with this study... whats the difference btwn what is in this book and what was written in a book last year when a Hindu claim himself as God and millions believed in him and still they believe even after his death by being ill... no one asks if I take a human as my God then how could he be ill or eventually be dead?

It moves glacierlike through human history, carrying with it the debris of outworn values and stubbornly trying to break through everything in its path by the sheer weight of its dogmatic claim.

Yes, a majority of Americans claim to be Christians, and American history was influenced by people of faith.

so: the total number of people «killed by religion» is around 23million you are claiming that more people have been «killed by religion» than have been killed IN ALL WARS combined throughout history.

Last line» ■ By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record.

From Answers in Genesis:» ■ By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record.

Oh and by the way, time doesn't exist either, history is nothing but (in) action by those who claim to have the rights to inherit whatever comes in handy while donating all else.

What concerns Berlin is the very old problem of the One and the Many Only very recently in our cultural history» since «the second third of the eighteenth century,» by Berlin's reckoning» have we developed a true appreciation of the claims of the «Many,» of diversity and pluralism in the realm of values.

Last but not least: «By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the Scriptural record.

Reinhold claims that a tragic view of history is necessary to help the Christian negotiate the gap between the ethical ideal and the possibilities attainable by human collective action.

It is not unfair to claim that all of continental European Jewish history is viewed by David Vital as an unfolding tragedy moving inevitably, like some Greek drama, toward genocide, with only Zionism, among the many political movements to find support among the Jews, having the prescience to foresee, however dimly, the catastrophe ahead.

Professor Matteo Luigi Napolitano, one of Italy's top authorities on contemporary Church history, followed with a comprehensive point - by - point rebuttal of Corriere della Sera's story, noting, in particular, what Yad Vashem's file on Palatucci found, in contrast to what the newspaper claimed.

Fortunately, most Christians today recognize that much of that traditional way Christians of centuries ago understood claims made in the scriptures must be rejected by the findings of history and the natural and human sciences.

When we turn to Daniel Day Williams» analysis of those «archetypal forms which love takes in history [and] which can be distinguished and analysed» (SFL 4), we find a thinker who is sensitive to the questions raised by Christian claims of superiority to Judaism.

Joe and Claryce Holcombe have alleged in their claim that the Air Force's actions «directly caused this horrific tragedy,» as they failed to follow their own policies by not reporting the shooter's criminal history to the FBI.

But the supposed history of intermediate positions the genetic approach claims to uncover rests on a view of the development and expression of Whitehead's thought that is clearly contradicted by Whitehead's own word and practice.

Even today's preachers and theologians who claim to be recipients of the truth so conveniently delivered once and for all, so long ago, are not as uninfluenced by history and culture as many of them seem to suppose.

If love has a history then here is the point at which that history is shaped by a new understanding which claims to have its source in the history of Jesus.