Sentences with phrase «by classical physics»

If I may use an analogy from your expertise, it's as if, in an engineering issue governed by classical physics — say the construction of a bridge between Vancouver and Victoria — you claimed, during a lecture on eng» g principles, that it could be readily and cheaply done because of some principle that you've recently discovered, through your own investigations, which happens to be contrary to one of Newton's law's.

Had they not made that mistake, they would have had to explain the rapid climate fall after 1940, which could not be explained by classical physics, but was consistent with quantum thermodynamics.

Physicists have since struggled to establish a clear boundary between our everyday world — which is governed by classical physics — and this strangeness of the quantum world.

All these materials fall under the heading of «quantum materials,» ceramics, layered composites and other materials whose electromagnetic behavior can not be explained by classical physics.

One world, fully explainable by classical physics.

Present states or movements in the inorganic arena appear to us to be determined totally by the history of past commotion in the macroscopic order as described by classical physics.

In the September edition of Physics World, an article appeared claiming the first «loophole - free» measurement of the violation of «Bell's inequality, a mathematical statement of the maximum correlation allowed by classical physics».

Not exact matches

There will usually be enough overlap between the assumptions of the two parties that a common core of observations - statements can be accepted by both — even, I would argue, in a change as far - reaching as that from classical physics to relativity.

It is arguable that, had Einstein known a metaphysics more favorable to quantum physics than the Spinozism and other similar doctrines influencing him, he might not have spent the latter decades of his life vainly attempting to recover the absolute «incarnate reason» of classical causality which had been made irrelevant by twentieth - century discoveries, including his own.

This abstraction has ultimately to be expressed precisely in some mathematical form that will give us a new description of implicate order, which is as systematic and coherent as that given in classical physics by the Cartesian co-ordinates.

If we try to Imagine that there must be something solid beneath the process, then this is because we are still being tricked by the assumptions of common sense and classical physics upon which materialism rests.

So the biological terms to do with growth and differentiation, for example, would eventually be replaced by terms from classical physics.

The reigning philosophies of nature, influenced as they still are by the scientific materialism of the classical era in physics, are incapable of sustaining any hope that things of value somehow escape being utterly forgotten.

It is of great interest to see how classical theism is affected by modern physics.

By integrating methods of statistical physics, computational science, and geographic information systems with classical network theory, the researchers have been able to find patterns that could help address problems as diverse as urban traffic congestion and the spread of epidemics.

I was always fascinated by physics, especially modern physics as it moved away from the mechanistic world of classical physics into the quantum world, and I found mathematics, especially pure mathematics, a very demanding and challenging subject that requires considerable powers of abstract thought and reasoning.

My copy of Electronics for Dummies now shares a shelf with Mathematics of Classical and Quantum Physics by Frederick Byron Jr. and Robert Fuller.

This has numerous precedents in classical physics, such as the flow of a fluid inside a domain, which is uniquely determined by the boundary conditions.

In 1900, he proposed the idea that energy comes in discrete chunks, or quanta, simply because the smooth delineations of classical physics could not explain the spectrum of energy re-radiated by an absorbing body.

Many computer scientists and physicists suggested that the device was actually being driven by plain old classical physics.

The work of Karplus, Levitt and Warshel is ground - breaking in that they managed to make Newton's classical physics work side - by - side with the fundamentally different quantum physics.

While the strong sigma or covalent bonds were explained by the new theories of quantum mechanics, hydrogen bonds were seen as nothing more than an electrostatic attraction between charged particles and were explained according the principles of classical physics.

Unlike protocols for ROT that use only classical physics, the security of the quantum protocol can not be broken by computational power.

If, after multiple measurements with this experimental setup, scientists found that the measurements of the particles were correlated more than predicted by the laws of classical physics, Kaiser says, then the universe as we see it must be based instead on quantum mechanics.

«The influence of laser light on the state of the atoms can be compared to the magnetization of solid crystals by an external magnetic field in classical physics,» Dr. Christian Groß, leader of the project, explains.

Fortunately, common sense doesn't guide the rules of quantum physics, as evidenced by a brief 1993 paper with a mouthful of a title: «Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State Via Dual Classical and Einstein - Podolsky - Rosen Channels.»

«Physicists blur the line between classical and quantum physics by connecting chaos and entanglement.»

Niels Bohr who took the opposite side of that argument said, «No, no, the quantum theory is fine; your problem is that you're trying to make sense of the world in some sort of classical terms, and you can't do that by looking through the lens of quantum physics.»

Entanglement is not possible in classical physics, so the nature of the system must be governed by quantum randomness.

Magnetism at the atomic level is driven by quantum mechanics — a fact that has shaken up classical physics calculations and called for increasingly complex, first - principle calculations, or calculations working forward from fundamental physics equations rather than relying on assumptions that reduce computational workload.

The paper by Goldston, a top scientist at the U.S. Department of Energy's Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) and former director of the Laboratory, showed that the width of the scrape - off layer depends on how rapidly plasma moves across the magnetic field — due to well - understood classical «drifts» — as it flows into the divertor chamber.

It explains the key principles of classical (Newtonian) mechanics in a clear, structured and detailed manner, taking the hand of the reader step - by - step through the basic concepts and math of physics, and then connecting advanced subjects to introductory ones to aid comprehension.

The three - dimensional nature of the Euclidean volume (from classical physics) has been replaced by the volume of sound and voice.

Let's not forget this very robust refutation of the very idea of climate modelling: > More than Bernoulli is at issue because Gosselin draws on the classical physics of d'Alembert, do you think the MSM will pay attention to him now that the bombshell paper by Marcie Rathke of the University of Southern North Dakota has been accepted for publication in Advances in Pure Mathematics?

A static climate is unmoved unless acted on by an external forcing — in a formulation reminiscent of classical physics.

You can not use the classical methodology of physics, developed by Galileo and Netwon, to solve problems with respect to the chaotic global atmosphere.

More than Bernoulli is at issue because Gosselin draws on the classical physics of d'Alembert, do you think the MSM will pay attention to him now that the bombshell paper by Marcie Rathke of the University of Southern North Dakota has been accepted for publication in Advances in Pure Mathematics.?

Since Gosselin draws on the classical physics of d'Alembert, do you think the MSM will pay attention to him now that the bombshell paper by Marcie Rathke of the University of Southern North Dakota has been accepted for publication in Advances in Pure Mathematics.?

The founder of sociologie and positivism, Auguste Comte believed in the early 1800s that there could be a «social physics», to explain (and perhaps engineer) the social world — that it functioned according to principles that are as physically - determined as the world observed by classical physicists.