Indiana law requires licensees to disclose known adverse material facts to their clients, and the trial had ruled that A.M. had failed to disclose known adverse material facts to the Owners but A.M. was protected
by a clause in the Agreement.
Disputes like this wage payment disagreement were covered
by a clause in the contract that called for binding arbitration, the employer argued successfully to the trial judge.
The reversion of rights is triggered
by a clause in a publishing contract.
During the legislative process, most bills are sent to a Committee stage when a group of at least 11 MPs consider the proposed Act clause
by clause in detail.
According to Abdulaziz Suleiman, who spke on behalf of the coalition, said: «Mindful of the concerns generated
by the clause in the Kaduna declaration that advised the Biafran Igbo to relocate from northern Nigeria and for northerners in the South East to do likewise, and our commitment to the unity of our dear country, we immediately opened channels for dialogue and interaction with government agencies, national and international groups, institutions and figures.
However, if Barcelona do have an eye on Griezmann moving forward, they will be severely disadvantaged
by the clause in question it seems.
Similarly, one is bound
by the clauses in a contract.)
Not exact matches
A mandatory arbitration
clause in her 11 - year - old employment contract prevented her from taking the matter to court, but her legal team circumvented the matter
by suing Ailes personally.
Although the plan is marketed as mandatory, a
clause in the budget provides an escape
by stating «those already participating
in a comparable workplace pension plan would not be required to enrol
in the ORPP.»
Expatriate Americans and green card holders who own more than 10 % of a «controlled foreign corporation» will reportedly be hit
by the repatriation
clause in the U.S. tax reform.
The suits
by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Human Rights Campaign, filed
in federal courts
in Baltimore and Seattle, claim Trump's plan violates the Equal Protection
clause of the Constitution.
The following guide will outline what you must include
by law,
clauses that legal experts say every employee handbook should include, and then other optional provisions you may want to include
in an employee handbook to make it work for you and your employees.
A
clause in the proposed tax plan announced
by Republicans Thursday would end a loophole regarding private art collections.
Exclusivity
clause This protects you
by asking the landlord to agree to not place a competing business
in his center, or, if it's a large mall, within so many feet of your business.
Le and Do sold licenses for the software and stuck
in a
clause that would allot them a modest - sounding five cents for every message handled
by the system.
The Portuguese striker made an official statement just days after reportedly informing lawyers to help lower the # 879 million exit
clause in his contract, which could attract interest from other clubs, as reported
by The Sun.
One of the few escape
clauses is a recession, which the statute defines as «a period of at least two consecutive quarters of negative growth
in real gross domestic product as reported
by Statistics Canada under the Statistics Act.»
Opinion polls showed that voters had opposed privatization at the outset (as did the press and many Conservative back benchers), but the Conservatives pointed out that Tony Blair rode to victory
in part
by abandoning «
Clause Four» of the Labour Party's 1904 constitution, advocating state control over the means of production, distribution and exchange.
To retain ownership rights over IP generated
by their employees, Canadian employers must indicate with an explicit
clause in the employment contract that IP developed while working at the company is the company's property.
Although the Chief Justice acknowledged that this argument had some merit, the more determinative factor — and the key difference between the statutory immunity provisions relied upon
by the ERCB and Alberta Environment — was that the immunity
clause with respect to the former explicitly contemplated the regulator as an entity («the Board or a member of the Board...») whereas the immunity provisions under the Water Act and the EPEA did not (referring only to «persons»
in various capacities; see paras 62 — 71).
the disposition of shares of common stock to us, or the withholding of shares of common stock
by us,
in a transaction exempt from Section 16 (b) of the Exchange Act solely
in connection with the payment of taxes due with respect to the vesting or settlement of RSUs granted under our equity incentive plans or pursuant to a contractual employment arrangement described elsewhere
in this prospectus, insofar as such RSU is outstanding as of the date of this prospectus; provided, that, if required, any public report or filing under Section 16 of the Exchange Act will clearly indicate
in the footnotes thereto that such disposition to us or withholding
by us of shares or securities was solely to us pursuant to the circumstances described
in this
clause;
the sale of shares of common stock
in an underwritten public offering that occurs during the restricted period, including any concurrent exercise (including a net exercise or cashless exercise) or settlement of outstanding equity awards granted under our equity incentive plans or pursuant to a contractual employment arrangement described elsewhere
in this prospectus
in order to sell the shares of common stock delivered upon such exercise or settlement
in such underwritten public offering; provided that, if required, any public report or filing under Section 16 of the Exchange Act will clearly indicate
in the footnotes thereto that such disposition to us or withholding
by us of shares or securities was solely to us pursuant to the circumstances described
in this
clause; or
Under a
clause in the union's contract, if Madison's Oscar Mayer plant closes, its employees have the right to take over a job that's held
by a worker with the least seniority at the Davenport factory.
Since this debate over pipelines began
in earnest last Fall, Jason Kenney and others have been calling on the federal government to invoke
clause 92 (10)(c) of the Constitution, which allows the federal government to exert authority over infrastructure such as pipelines which, «although wholly situate within the Province, are before or after their Execution declared
by the Parliament of Canada to be for the general Advantage of Canada or for the Advantage of Two or more of the Provinces.»
Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, known as the «notwithstanding
clause,» has just about acquired the status of a zombie law
in recent decades, left largely untouched
by legislatures (at least
in the Rest of Canada).
They do this
by using a
clause in the contract between lender and borrower, despite being asked to remove the
clause.
These
clauses exist
in thousands of international trade and investment deals and are used
by multinational companies from rich countries to sue governments when policy decisions interfere with their investments.
Rio Tinto is set to invoke a
clause that will allow the miner to walk away from contracts with a giant metal refinery
in Ireland controlled
by Russian billionaire Oleg Deripaska.
On a more fundamental level, the negotiations remain at an impasse over a collection of U.S. proposals dubbed «poison pills»
by U.S. Chamber President and CEO Thomas J. Donohue, including the proposed sunset
clause, an extreme approach to rule of origins for the auto and textile / apparel sectors, and measures that would undermine investment protection, government procurement, and trade
in seasonal produce.
Although this is typically the amount of the financing which the investors are entitled to purchase
by reason of their contractual rights of first refusal, this approach may not work properly because the sum of the ownership percentages of the various investors will be less than 100 %, and the primary purpose of the pay to play
clause is to assist the company
in raising the total amount of financing which it requires.
However, given that trade agreements come into effect only through legislation enacted
by Congress pursuant to the Commerce
Clause, it follows that the only manner
in which the United States can withdraw from a trade agreement is for Congress to repeal the implementing legislation.
The Terms, the arbitration
clause contained
in them, and all non-contractual obligations arising
in any way whatsoever out of or
in connection with these Terms are governed
by, construed, and take effect
in accordance with US federal law and Nevada state law.
and finally resolved
by arbitration
in the United States under Nevada State Law which will be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into this
clause, save for any waiver of any rights the parties would otherwise have to any form of appeal or recourse to a court of law or other judicial authority, which rights are expressly reserved.
it cracks me up that people would be respectful to any god that would offer up their own son
in blood scarifice, not a kind and benevolent, all knowing god, an evil and hateful god, we would be better off overing respects to santa
clause, to my knowledge all he does is disappoint from time to time ive never known him to kill and destroy mankind
by divers and sundry forms of cruel punishment.
I'm reading NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare decision)
in preparation for teaching the case to my constitutional law students and came across the following most interesting passage
in in Justice Ginsburg's opinion: «A mandate to purchase a particular product would be unconstitutional if, for example, the edict impermissibly abridged the freedom of speech, interfered with the free exercise of religion, or infringed on a liberty interest protected
by the Due Process
Clause.»
The religious among us keep trying to chip away at the separation of church and state
by making people recite the pledge of allegiance with the God
clause, installing religious symbols and displays on public property, holding prayer breakfasts for politicians, berating the removal of prayer
in public schools, trying to pass laws limiting women's access to birth control, and trying to get an amendment passed outlawing abortion (since
in their view God creates a soul the moment a sperm enters an egg).
In a manner familiar
by now, they construe the teaching on conscience as a «conscience
clause» exempting them from moral responsibility.
Also,
in response to the way you twisted your question, the so - called holy wars that you and Thor are referring to were also run
by governments so also fall under the whole «nations supressing other religions»
clause of your statement and are invalid.
Then you continue to justify that easy out conclusion
by putting God
in the same category as Santa
Clause, the Easter Bunny, or the Flying Spagetti Monster since you can't prove that they don't exist and it's ridiculous to believe
in those ergo that automatically means that is just as ridiculous to believe
in a God, like a one conclusion fits all scenario even though that scenario still doesn't change the fact that you are concluding something that can not be proven.
Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion to another...
in the words of Jefferson, the [First Amendment]
clause against establishment of religion
by law was intended to erect «a wall of separation between church and State»... That wall must be kept high and impregnable.
However,
in clause two he doesn't continue
by saying that those leaders failed
in their task.
Our first instinct
in the legal battles spawned
by the progressive excesses of the last few years is to reach for the free exercise
clause, which after all exists to protect religious people's ability to live out their faiths
in practice.
Jay responded
by ruminating on this
clause in the Constitution and confessing sadly that «the word slaves was avoided, probably on account of the existing toleration of slavery, and of its discordancy with the principles of the Revolution; and from a consciousness of its being repugnant to... the Declaration of Independence» (111:298) The number of such revealing glimpses into the thinking of the founders is almost without number.
The significance of the master's commendation is expressed
by the
clause, «for the sons of this world are more shrewd
in dealing with their own generation than the sons of light.»
On 23 February, the United States Attorney General, Eric Holder, Jr., sent a letter to members of Congress
in which he informed them that President Obama had determined that DOMA is
in violation of the equal protection
clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and, as such, will no longer be defended
by his administration.
Under the free - exercise
clause every person is entitled to respect for her or his religious commitments, and their free exercise should not be burdened
by governmental interference except to secure «compelling state interests» (such as protection of public health and safety, not just public welfare or order) that can be served
in no less burdensome way.
Separation between church and state is a phrase often used to summarize, perhaps to sloganize, the relationship between religion and government envisioned
by the founders and decreed
by them
in the religion
clause of the First Amendment.
The concrescing subject lured
by (loves John x) is also lured
by other
clauses, i.e.,
by any of those
in the left hand column above.
Should the concrescing subject be lured instead
by (loves John Jane), the
clauses show that because Jane can not be prehended as intelligent
in this subject's actual world, (loves John Jane) can not be felt as true.
Some concrescing entity establishes the head and tail
clauses by prehensions
in its actual world which allow confirmation of the
clauses as true judgments.