Leo Hickman: Politicians who flatly reject climate science are now being replaced
by climate policy sceptics
A strategy used
by climate policy proponents to counter the strategies of the merchants of doubt (Oreskes and Conway, 2010; Schneider and Flannery, 2009) has been the establishment of a broad international scientific consensus with high confidence levels, strong appeals to the authority of the consensus relative to opposing viewpoints, and exposure of the motives of skeptics.
But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth
by climate policy.
Another U.N. official has admitted that the U.N. seeks to «redistribute de facto the world's wealth
by climate policy.»
German economist and IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer gave an eye - opening interview to Neue Zürcher Zeitung (translated here), in which he said that «one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth
by climate policy....
This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole,» «We redistribute de facto the world's wealth
by climate policy,» Ottmar Edenhofer, IPCC working group on Mitigation of Climate Change 2008 to 2015.
Such a transition would save $ 1.8 trillion over the next two decades, says a study
by the Climate Policy Initiative, which also found that governments and taxpayers will bear the greatest financial risk if fossil fuel reserves are stranded underground.
Watch Now: Climate Depot's Morano on Fox News to discuss UN's goal of «redistributing world's wealth
by climate policy»
See: Watch Now: Climate Depot's Morano on Fox News to discuss UN's goal of «redistributing world's wealth
by climate policy»: Morano: «Climategate and real world data, has revealed that [the AGW scare] has been a con game.
Moreover, it is a far cry from the «downside» case implied
by climate policy.
However, the projected development beyond 2020 is only compatible with the IEA alternative policy scenario in which coal production is constrained
by climate policy measures while the IEA reference scenario assumes further increasing coal consumption (and production) until at least 2030.
Newsbusters.org feasted on the notion of a major industry being bankrupted
by climate policy (and on the lack of «mainstream media» coverage of a 10 - month - old remark made made in an interview with a major paper and openly available in recordings posted on the paper's Web site).
Global spending to combat climate change fell last year and remains far below the level needed to prevent its most dangerous effects, a report
by the Climate Policy Initiative said on Tuesday.
It is clear from the documents that Heartland advocates against responsible climate mitigation and then uses that advocacy to raise money from oil companies and «other corporations whose interests are threatened
by climate policies.»
«The GWPF [Global Warming Policy Foundation] often draws attention to the many studies ignored by greens that suggest climate change is not so dangerous, and to the economic and environmental harm done
by climate policies.
Other contributions will be pursued for this work, especially from corporations whose interests are threatened
by climate policies.»
Not exact matches
This federal
policy reversal will be discouraging to many, particularly since conventional wisdom suggests that American action on
climate change is a necessary predicate to strong action
by China and India.
«
By getting active in communities, we can raise our voices to defend
policies and regulations that will protect wild places and wildlife, reduce carbon emissions, build a modern energy economy based on investment in renewables, and, most crucially, ensure the United States remains fully committed to the vital goals set forth in the Paris Agreement on
climate change.»
In addition to stimulating this sector — key to many small - town economies — the province's Wood First Act aimed to assist
climate policy by substituting carbon - emitting materials for carbon - sequestering ones.
If you're worried about
climate change, your first concern should be effective
policy (
by how much will this reduce emissions?)
The challenge in prompting change — broadening the classic definition of «infrastructure,» and investing in initiatives aimed at adapting to a turbulent planet — is heightened
by partisan divisions over
climate policy and development.
Or think of the price the Canadian economy is expected to pay for the damage wreaked
by climate change after years of oil industry lobbyists opposing serious carbon reduction
policies.
However, the Pan Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and
Climate Change lays out a number of
policies that will compel more clean tech innovation in Canada, he said, including a price on pollution with a carbon price, to be in place across Canada
by the start of next year, as well as a promised national clean fuels strategy, better energy efficiency standards and limits on greenhouse gases like methane.
Once the project is finished, researchers are hoping to help
climate migrants successfully integrate into Canadian society
by providing solutions to
policy makers and increasing local awareness on
climate migration.
Monetary
policy can make for a more predictable investment
climate by keeping inflation low and stable.
Last year, the federal government announced it would develop a
policy that aims to cut more carbon pollution than any other in the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and
Climate Change,
by promoting the production and use of cleaner fuels in vehicles, buildings and industry.
These results come from a survey of 1,848 Canadians conducted December 12 to 14, 2016,
by Abacus Data at the request of Clean Energy Canada, measuring Canadians» views of
climate and clean energy policy issues, including the new Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate
climate and clean energy
policy issues, including the new Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and
Climate Climate Change.
Posted
by Nick Falvo under Alberta, budgets, carbon pricing, child benefits,
climate change, corporate income tax, debt, demographics, energy, environment, federal budget, health care, homeless, housing, HST, income support, income tax, inflation, population aging, poverty, public services, seniors, social
policy, taxation.
Even though the intellectual
climate within the Reserve Bank and other economic
policy agencies was already moving in favour of deregulation in the early 1970s, wider community acceptance of the case for change did not come until after the Government set up a broad - ranging inquiry, conducted
by a group of independent experts.
Importantly, none of these groups could point to federal government dysfunction on
climate policy to defend their own inaction, he said, because the wild rhetoric of government dissidents like Craig Kelly does not reflect mainstream government
policy for the nation to meet its Paris commitments for a 26 - 28 per cent reduction in carbon emissions
by 2030.
But he said moving to meet
climate targets is becoming more affordable because while
policy is still important the energy market is transforming so fast that «market forces have taken over», market forces around wind and solar power and batteries «are just accelerating regardless of what anyone else does» and decisions
by companies like AGL Energy to close their Liddell coal power station «are being made on economic grounds».
Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer says that
climate models used
by government agencies to create
policies «have failed miserably.»
By positing a fixed amount of investment in Canada regardless of
climate policy, the study ignores the threat that carbon - intensive industries will relocate to other countries that choose not to regulate emissions.
One recommendation
by the alliance takes aim at Ontario government energy
policy that could also double as
climate policy, as the province has curtailed greenhouse gas emissions coming from the electricity sector
by closing coal - fired power plants, invested in costly solar and wind energy projects, and instituted a cap - and - trade system that requires businesses to buy permits to cover their carbon emissions.
Some will argue that state governments in the US will fill the
climate policy void left
by the incoming Trump Administration.
The report claims the emissions cap included in Alberta government's
climate change plan will cost Canada's oil sands industry $ 250 billion and is the latest in a concerted effort
by conservative opponents of the NDP to undermine its flagship
policy.
The North American
climate policy partnership forged
by Prime Minister Trudeau and President Obama is ending.
After years of inaction
by the old Progressive Conservative government, it is refreshing to have a government that believes in
climate change and has actually presented a
policy to address it.
In environmental
policy, the Party has introduced Alberta's New
Climate Change Pan, which will reduce greenhouse gas emissions
by 200 megatons
by 2050.
Posted
by Angella MacEwen under budgets,
climate change, deficits, Employment Insurance, federal budget, fiscal
policy, labour market.
The Shared Mobility Principles for Livable Cities were developed in 2017
by Robin Chase, Zipcar co-Founder, and a consortium of leading city and transport organizations including: the C40 Cities
Climate Leadership Group, ICLEI — Local Governments for Sustainability, Institute for Transportation and Development
Policy, Natural Resources Defense Council, Partnership on Sustainable Low Carbon Transport (SLoCaT), Transportation for America (T4America), Rocky Mountain Institute, Shared - Use Mobility Center, and WRI Ross Center for Sustainable Cities.
Emphasizing her government's record on refugees and
climate - change
policy, and stressing Canada's shared values with Europe, she was interrupted multiple times
by applause.
A small but growing number of countries now have legal requirements for institutional investors to report on how their investment
policies and performance are affected
by environmental factors, including South Africa and, prospectively, the EU.36 Concern about the risks of a «carbon bubble» — that highly valued fossil fuel assets and investments could be devalued or «stranded» under future, more stringent
climate policies — prompted G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in April 2015 to ask the Financial Stability Board in Basel to convene an inquiry into how the financial sector can take account of
climate - related issues.37
The European Union, once the proud leader in
climate policies (
by its own estimation) is in internal disarray.
In April 2016, CSIRO was engaged
by the Australian Government to develop the Low Emissions Technology Roadmap to inform the 2017
Climate Policy review.
As individuals,
by working in our communities, and
by supporting
climate policy, we can effect dramatic positive change at the community level.
It has been an honour to negotiate and then serve in the first coalition government of modern times which has substantial achievements both in reducing the economic dangers faced
by our country, and in making progress with
policies to tackle
climate change and provide energy security.
As I point out in chapter three, Dieter Helm, Professor of Energy
Policy at Oxford, and one of the most authoritative writers on the subject, has shown that the world's response to the threat posed
by climate change has so far been hopelessly inadequate, and that a world - wide programme of «de-carbonization» is urgently needed.
The coalition government is unwaveringly refusing to reverse a combination of the housing and
climate change
policies formulated
by Ed Miliband as secretary of state for energy and
climate change in Gordon Brown's last Labour government.
Instead, Cameron and Osborne were fighting against a Financial Transaction Tax (FTT), a
policy backed
by Germany, France, Bill Gates and the Pope among others, which, even on modest estimates, could raise billions for domestic and international efforts against poverty and
climate change.