Sentences with phrase «by computer models simply»
-LSB-...] Prominent scientist Professor Nils - Axel Morner, declared «the rapid rise in sea levels predicted by computer models simply can not happen.»
http://www.climatedepot.com/ Not exact matches
«Their two most convincing arguments - that the warming is natural in origin, and that the computer models are wrong - are either directly contradicted by this analysis, or simply do not apply to it.»
Another point is the fact that general circulation models have our understanding of relevant processes encoded into lines of computer code, whereas empirical - statistical models capture all relevant processes simply by the fact that these are emedded in the data itself.
What climate models assume is a wide - ranging compendium of physical processes that are either well known but too complicated to incorporate into the climate model (for example the direct radiational effect of Carbon Dioxide on greenhouse warming is considerably * simplified * compared to the most sophisticated «line - by - line» radiation models that are available, simply because there isn't enough computer power to make the line - by - line calculation at every location on Earth at every time step within in a GCM), or are not sufficiently well - known to treat them with complete certainty.
The facts, simply stated: There is no science, no computer model, nor any available mechanism (s) that would allow today's humans to tweak CO2 emissions a certain way in order to produce a future climate of specific attributes by, say, 2050.
Chu's assertions «quite simply being proven wrong by the latest climate data» — Computer model predictions are not «evidence»]
You can get an idea of how an amplfier might respond to a change in its inputs by computer modelling every individual component in its design, but it is far easier and more reliable to simply measure the response on the real system.
«Their two most convincing arguments — that the warming is natural in origin, and that the computer models are wrong — are either directly contradicted by this analysis, or simply do not apply to it.»