Furthermore, the three - dimensional structure of ODD was confirmed
by confirmatory factor analysis and the CPRS - R emotional lability scale significantly predicted the ODD irritable dimension.
This was followed
by confirmatory factor analysis using a new set of data collected subsequently for validation.
Under the a priori hypothesis that each scale measures a distinct latent trait, construct validity was assessed
by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for each scale respectively, using structured equation models.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA): the one - factor model was conducted
by confirmatory factor analysis giving unacceptable global fit indices.
The three - factor structure of the JIDI was confirmed
by confirmatory factor analysis.
Not exact matches
Measuring disability experienced
by adults living with HIV: assessing construct validity of the HIV Disability Questionnaire using
confirmatory factor analysis
Operationalization was tested using
confirmatory factor analyses and causal hypotheses were evaluated
by means of structural equation modeling.
Results highlighted a) through exploratory and
confirmatory factor analyses, a meaningful six -
factor model (emotion expression, task utility self - persuasion, help - seeking, negative self - talk, brief attentional relaxation, and dysfunctional avoidance); b) satisfactory internal reliabilities; c) test - retest reliability scores indicative of a satisfactory stability of the measures over time; d) preliminary evidence of convergent and discriminant validity with CERS - M being very weakly linked to verbal skill and moderately to emotion regulation strategies measured through the Flemish version of the COPE - questionnaire; e) preliminary evidence of criterion validity, with CERS - M scores predicting math anxiety, and to a lesser extent, students» performance; f) preliminary evidence of incremental validity, with the CERS - M predicting math anxiety and performance over and above emotion regulation measured
by the COPE - questionnaire.
Moreover,
confirmatory factor analyses using parcels revealed that the two -
factor model met all cutoff criteria (CFI >.95, TLI >.95, RMSEA <.06) proposed
by Hu & Bentler (1999).
Several studies have replicated the PSC - 17's 3 -
factor structure
by using
confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in moderate - sized samples, 26,27 and a number of studies28 — 37 have reported on the prevalence of risk
by using the overall and subscale scores.
The data were analysed
by means of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21, except for
confirmatory factor analysis.
The following aspects of the BIQ - SF were subjected to a psychometric evaluation: (a) the hypothesized six - correlated
factors structure of the scale was tested
by means of a
confirmatory factor analysis, (b) various types of reliability were investigated including the internal consistency, test — retest reliability, and cross-informant agreement, and (c) several aspects of the validity were explored such as the relations with anxiety and internalizing (i.e., convergent validity) and externalizing (i.e., divergent validity) symptoms as well as the relations between BIQ - SF scores of parents and teachers and laboratory observations of an inhibited temperament (i.e., predictive validity).
Exploratory and
confirmatory factor analysis done
by Finley and Schwartz (2004) indicated that a three -
factor structure provided the best fit for the data.
However, when the same items are used with teachers,
confirmatory factor analysis showed that urban and suburban samples shared the same
factor structure, and that the
factor structure showed only small differences
by gender, age, school grade, or severity of ADHD symptom counts (Wolraich et al., 2002).
Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the measurement model of macro ratings of limit setting and positive behavior support was not supported
by the data, and thus, were excluded from further
analyses.
First, the preschool and school - age SDQ's
factor structure was examined
by using
confirmatory factor analysis.
Thabet et al [33] conducted a
confirmatory factor analysis of the Arabic version of the SDQ scored
by parents of children within the Gazza Strip.
In Study 2, the three -
factor structure proposed
by authors was tested in a sample of 417 adolescents (270 girls and 147 boys) using
confirmatory analysis, and indexes showed a suboptimal fit.
Results highlighted a) through exploratory and
confirmatory factor analyses, a meaningful six -
factor model (emotion expression, task utility self - persuasion, help - seeking, negative self - talk, brief attentional relaxation, and dysfunctional avoidance); b) satisfactory internal reliabilities; c) test - retest reliability scores indicative of a satisfactory stability of the measures over time; d) preliminary evidence of convergent and discriminant validity with CERS - M being very weakly linked to verbal skill and moderately to emotion regulation strategies measured through the Flemish version of the COPE - questionnaire; e) preliminary evidence of criterion validity, with CERS - M scores predicting math anxiety, and to a lesser extent, students» performance; f) preliminary evidence of incremental validity, with the CERS - M predicting math anxiety and performance over and above emotion regulation measured
by the COPE - questionnaire.
The SDQ's internal
factor structure was assessed
by using
confirmatory factor analysis, with a series of competing models and extensions used to determine construct, convergent, and discriminant validity and measurement invariance over time.
Most recently Palmieri and Smith [29] used
confirmatory factor analysis to investigate three models of the SDQs
factor structure using data from a US sample of custodial grandmothers and found that the best representation of the latent structure was provided
by a model which included the original five
factors and an additional
factor comprising a «positive construal»
factor made up from the positively worded questions.
At a preliminary stage, before testing hypotheses with Hierarchical Regression
Analyses,
Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFAs) as implemented
by AMOS [50].
The present study reports on exploratory and
confirmatory factor analyses of disruptive girl behavior over four successive data waves as rated
by parents and teachers in a large, representative community sample of girls (N = 2,451).
Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) showed that the variance of the YPI subscales could be explained
by the three latent constructs, the grandiose / manipulative dimension (interpersonal), the callous / unemotional dimension (affective), and the impulsive / irresponsible dimension (behavioral), replicating the findings of Andershed et al. (2002).
We performed, as a preliminary
analysis, a
confirmatory factor analysis on the SCL items
by using structural equation modeling (SEM) to reduce the information entailed in the nine items of the scale into a reduced number of
factors.