Sentences with phrase «by convincing scientific evidence»

Not exact matches

Such instances, for which no convincing scientific explanations have been given, are cited by some Christian biologists as evidence of God's intervention in the process.

And that reality has been demonstrated over and over again, most recently in the work of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature project, led by Dr. Richard Muller, who began his comprehensive assessment as an avowed climate skeptic and ended it convinced by the clear evidence that global warming is happening and is caused by human activity.This conclusion is emphatically shared by the best and brightest of the global scientific community, including our own National Academy of Sciences.

It is funny that the same people who repeatedly argue that there is an absence of scientific evidence to support climate science — are willing to base that argument on the fact that they have not been convinced to their «proper» satisfaction by fellow blog - commenters.

In no cases, has any convincing evidence of fraud arisen, and his scientific work has been broadly supported by later studies.

They are always able to come up with an explanation for any scientific data pointing to the world existing for longer than 6000 years; and they will never be convinced by any evidence because they «know» that come what may the Bible is always true.

The problems any of these individual surveys can and do present are minuscule compared to the laughable counterpoints Bast and Spencer throw at them: a 2012 survey, for example, which found a strong showing of climate denial among members of the American Meteorological Society, and a petition, signed by 31,000 scientists asserting that «there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of... carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate.»

I have become convinced that there is no more noble pursuit we can engage in than to seek to insure that policy is informed by an objective assessment of scientific evidence.

«The paper on «seepage» by Lewandowsky et al provides sobering and convincing evidence for how climate change denial affects the scientific community — this should make every climate scientist pause and think.

The overwhelming message of the world scientists, the US National Academy of Sciences, all the national academies of all the industrial nations, all the scientific societies in the US that have weighed in on the matter, all on record as being convinced by the many lines of evidence that human - caused climate change is real, and it's a threat.

I guess I would suggest two articles for this letter to the editor, «There is no proof» and «No past, no present» Peopel who flat out deny there is any evidence wo n`t be convinced but they should be pointed to the IPCC report, the most extensively reviewed scientific document in history, endorsed by just about every major relevant scientific body and major governmental science academy, including the US.

What is meant by the term here is the combination of argument from authority and argument ad populam, in which the arguer does not give the argument and evidence that has convinced the scientific community, but instead uses an an argument the claim simply that all scientists say so.

Show me, in a convincing way, by using scientific measurements and empirical evidence, that this is so.

And yet, we can be rationally convinced that climate - change is real, serious, and accelerating... by Feynman's traditional standard of scientific evidence!

It divides publishing climate scientists into those that are convinced or unconvinced by scientific evidence on anthropogenic climate change (and assesses the apparent relative scientific expertise of these according to their publishing history).

Gov. Scott, who won a second term in November, has repeatedly said he is not convinced that climate change is caused by human activity, despite scientific evidence to the contrary.